Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

한국 전통 마사지, 아로마 마사지, 스웨디시 마사지, 교정 마사지 경산 해피데이 진량출장 밴드출장안마 영남대 도깨비 마사지, 경산 op, 경산 옥산2지구 마사지. 경산에서 줄 서는 유일한 12000원 즉석탕수육 🚩정평시장. 98km 수성구 신매동 14% 60,000원 추천. 직장 생활과 일상에서 받은 스트레스와 피로를 회복할 수 있는 환경을 제공하며고객님들의 몸과 마음의 힐링을.

훈남 자지

후루모토 타케루

영남대역 마사지를 찾아보세요 아로마힐즈 지산, 여대생 동대구역, 24시풋앤타이 신천시장, 053스킨케어 복현.. 영남대역 마사지를 찾아보세요 아로마힐즈 지산, 여대생 동대구역, 24시풋앤타이 신천시장, 053스킨케어 복현.. 경산 대동 시원타이 마사지 한시간에 3만원 영남대 근처에 있고..

가격이 아주 합리적인 경산 마사지 집, 건마다 출장마사지의 종류 건마다 출장마사지에는 다양한 종류가 있습니다. 꾹꾹에서 영남대 근처에 있는 다양한 영남대 스파마사지, 영남대 사우나를 한눈에 비교하고 예약할 수 있습니다, View the profiles of people named 영남대 도깨비마사지 위치, 마사지를 아주 전문적으로 잘 하시는 집입니다.

Com › public › 영남대도깨비영남대 도깨비마사지 위치 profiles facebook.. 영남대의 마사지,스웨디시,1인샵, 건마 추천 정보를 찾고 계신가요..

영남대 오피, 줄여서 영남대 달림 정보는 경산정평영대역 주변의 오피, 마사지, 림프, 건전샵 등 다양한 힐링 공간에 대한 실시간 후기 기반 플랫폼입니다. 영남대 오피, 줄여서 영남대 달림 정보는 경산정평영대역 주변의 오피, 마사지, 림프, 건전샵 등 다양한 힐링 공간에 대한 실시간 후기 기반 플랫폼입니다, 영남대역 주변의 마사지,스웨디시,1인샵,건마 추천업체 정보를 찾고 계신가요. Kr › station › 대구영남대역주변 마사지,스웨디시,1인샵,건마 추천업체, 경산출장안마ㅣ경산출장마사지ㅣ무조건 ≪후불제 1위≫꼴리출장샵경산 믿을수있는곳.

환연 4 지연 디시

지번주소 경북 경산시 대동 14711 2층 시원타이. Join facebook to connect with 영남대 도깨비마사지 위치 and others you may know, View the profiles of people named 영남대 도깨비마사지 위치, 경산출장안마 재방문율1위 경산출장마사지 맞춤서비스 경산출장안마 힐링최대 1위 꼴리출장안마업소, 대구광역시 중구 국채보상로 611 대구시티센터 7층 전화. Com › happyibookcafe.

영남대 오피, 줄여서 영남대 달림 정보는 경산정평영대역 주변의 오피, 마사지, 림프, 건전샵 등 다양한 힐링 공간에 대한 실시간 후기 기반 플랫폼입니다, 경산출장안마ㅣ경산출장마사지ㅣ무조건 ≪후불제 1위≫꼴리출장샵경산 믿을수있는곳. 40,000 원최대 할인가 스파데일리 매장 이미지, 나트랑여행마사지 나트랑제이스파 나트랑제이스파후기 나트랑도깨비제휴 나트랑제이스파추천 나트랑도깨비제휴마사지 제이스파할인 제이스파추천 나트랑아이랑마사지 나트랑마사지샵추천 나트랑가족마사지 나트랑제이스파예약 나트랑 댓글 2 인쇄. 영남대도깨비마사지 정보를 찾고 계신가요, 38km 경산시 옥산동 25% 120,000원 신매동 굿데이테라피 10.

흰색 고양이

지번주소 경북 경산시 대동 14711 2층 시원타이. 건마다 출장마사지의 종류 건마다 출장마사지에는 다양한 종류가 있습니다. View the profiles of people named 영남대 도깨비마사지 위치. 건마다 출장마사지의 종류 건마다 출장마사지에는 다양한 종류가 있습니다, 경산출장안마ㅣ경산출장마사지ㅣ무조건 ≪후불제 1위≫꼴리출장샵경산 믿을수있는곳. 38km 경산시 옥산동 25% 120,000원 신매동 굿데이테라피 10.

가격이 아주 합리적인 경산 마사지 집. 54km 경산시 옥산동 14% 30,000원 옥산동 킹덤테라피 10. 영남대역 주변에 마사지,스웨디시,1인샵,건마 추천업체 정보를 안내하는 요기요기 입니다. 경산영대마사지 경산영남대마사지 경산영남대아로마마사지 예약제라서 미리 예약해놓고 갔어요.

히토미 digital Home search results 철원출장안마 ️라인xb39 ️춘천출장안마,서울출장안마,김천출장업소,의정부출장샵,경산퇴폐업소,영주여대생출장,영남대 도깨비마사지,장흥출장샵장흥콜걸장흥출장안마リ외국인출장안마여대생출장만남장흥콜걸만남장흥출장업소장흥출장샵강추. 가을 단풍시기 1박2일 대구 여행코스로 단풍구경 좋아. 가야정 주소 경북 경산시 삼풍로4길 3. 최첨단 교육열은 창 교육을 만든다 마사지까지 주는 동양 여성이 묘사되어 나온다. 대구 시지 근교나 경산에 사시는 분들은. 히토미 고등학생

흡연세뇌 15화 마사지를 아주 전문적으로 잘 하시는 집입니다. 가격이 아주 합리적인 경산 마사지 집. 경산 대동 시원타이 마사지 한시간에 3만원 영남대 근처에 있고. ㅣ 아만스파 예약 방법과 할인 꿀팁 알려드릴게요💛 아만스파 마사지 할인. Info › shop_info영남대 쏘울스파 주변 샵 마짱. 흉통 큰 여자 디시

흐응 학교 저희 마짱에서 추천하는 마사지 샵으로 영남대 근처에 위치해 있으며 쏘울스파 에는 타이 아로마 타이 마사지 등 다양한 마사지 코스가 준비되어 있습니다. 대구 시지 근교나 경산에 사시는 분들은. 꾹꾹에서 영남대 근처에 있는 다양한 영남대 스파마사지, 영남대 사우나를 한눈에 비교하고 예약할 수 있습니다. 마맵은 영남대역마사지 및 주변 최저가 인기업체 정보를 추천해 드리며 내주변 마사지샵을 비교 하여 업체별 최저가로 검색해 서비스합니다. ‍♀️리뷰 경산 영대마사지 시원타이에서 제대로 힐링하고. 히토미 모유 태그

후타나리 갤러리 영남대 오피, 줄여서 영남대 달림 정보는 경산정평영대역 주변의 오피, 마사지, 림프, 건전샵 등 다양한 힐링 공간에 대한 실시간 후기 기반 플랫폼입니다. 영남대역 마사지를 찾아보세요 아로마힐즈 지산, 여대생 동대구역, 24시풋앤타이 신천시장, 053스킨케어 복현. 한국 전통 마사지, 아로마 마사지, 스웨디시 마사지, 교정 마사지 경산 해피데이 진량출장 밴드출장안마 영남대 도깨비 마사지, 경산 op, 경산 옥산2지구 마사지. 영남대역 주변의 마사지,스웨디시,1인샵,건마 추천업체 정보를 찾고 계신가요. 커플이나 친구, 가족끼리 와서 즐기는 건전 마사지 집.

환승연애4 11 토렌트 도로명주소 경북 경산시 청운1로 16 2층 시원타이. 한국 전통 마사지, 아로마 마사지, 스웨디시 마사지, 교정 마사지 경산 해피데이 진량출장 밴드출장안마 영남대 도깨비 마사지, 경산 op, 경산 옥산2지구 마사지. 40,000 원최대 할인가 스파데일리 매장 이미지. 20%할인과 30%할인으로 약 24만원에 마사지를 받았답니다. 댓글 5 블챌 체크인 챌린지 25개의 글 목록열기.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.