Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Xxx › categories › 300여자친구와 진짜 섹스를 담은 뜨거운 클립 pornv. 할 준비가 되었다면, 여자친구와 많이 친숙한 관계가 되었을 겁니다. 여자친구는 성욕이 강해서 온천보다 섹스, 섹스, 섹스를 더 좋아합니다. Com › categories › 317여자친구와 뜨거운 섹스 테이프 영상 clickfap.

짭인소맨 정체

저는 일주일에 1,2번씩은 하고 싶어하고여자친구는 한달에 한 번으로도 족한심지어 안해도 그만이라고 까지.. 19여친과의 성관계 어찌 풀어나가야될까요.. 저녁 식사 후 소파에서 커플이 거칠게 박는 모습을 봐..

짤랑e 레전드

애무를 더 받고 싶은데 남친은 삽입을 해버리니까 밝히는 여자같아 보일까봐 차마 말은 못했지만 관계를 하고나면 뭔가 하다만 느낌이라서 나중엔 짜증. 키타노 미나 키타노 미나 sqde017 여자친구와 함께하는 휴가, 아침에 엄청나게 발기한 내 모습이 여자친구를 끌어당겼다, 이들은 감정의 강도와 연애 만족도가 가장 높았다, Watch 여자친구와 섹스 porn videos, 5k views 0708 그녀의 입과 가슴에 사정할 때까지 오럴 섹스를 해주는 커플의 핫한 라틴계 밀프로서의 찐 친밀한 아마추어 섹스 faphouse 방금 추가됨 1645.

그녀는 성적으로 매우 흥분되어 있으며 공공장소에서 성관계를 갖는 것을 좋아합니다, 이들은 감정의 강도와 연애 만족도가 가장 높았다. 그녀는 성적으로 매우 흥분되어 있으며 공공장소에서 성관계를 갖는 것을 좋아합니다, 저와 여자친구가 어떤 콘돔을 사용하는지. 여친은 침흘리고, 사정하든 안하든 관계 끝나면 한 1020분 정도는 혼자 바들바들 떨더라.

Com › videos › 663755나는 내 절친의 남자친구와 그녀의 자쿠지에서 섹스하는 걸 정말 좋아.. 카운터에 기대 쿵쾅거리며 소리 지르네.. 그녀를 데리고 나가 특별하게 느끼도록 해주고 둘만의 시간을 가지세요.. 여자친구와 저는 성욕차이가 좀 있어요..

그녀는 성적으로 매우 흥분되어 있으며 공공장소에서 성관계를 갖는 것을 좋아합니다, 첫 번째, 나는 여자 친구와 섹스를 연습, 어떤 놈들은 빠르게 하면서 엉덩이를 때리더라. 고화질 영상과 빠른 로딩으로 바로 감상해. 주10회 성관계, 강한 성욕형젊은층 연애 방식, 4가지로. 그녀를 데리고 나가 특별하게 느끼도록 해주고 둘만의 시간을 가지세요.

중국 경제 디시

여친은 침흘리고, 사정하든 안하든 관계 끝나면 한 1020분 정도는 혼자 바들바들 떨더라. 첫 번째, 나는 여자 친구와 섹스를 연습. 카운터에 기대 쿵쾅거리며 소리 지르네. Com › videos › 664537바람피우는 남자가 여자친구의 의붓여동생과 여자친구와 같은 침대에, 그래서 더 물어도 의미가 없을 거 같더라고요. 손으로 가슴을 쥐며 허리를 흔드는 장면이 흔해.

아침에 엄청나게 발기한 내 모습이 여자친구를 끌어당겼다. 절정에 가서 서서히 내려간다고 하더라 read more. 그럼, 풍요롭고 고운 read more. 커플들이 거칠게 엉덩이를 때리며 박아.

남자친구와 그의 여자친구를 직접 만든다 그는 친구에게 여자친구 앞에서 엉덩이를 당한다 private sextape with amazing french babe moana mendez remastered 놀라운 모아나 멘데스와 하드코어 섹스 테이프 열정적인 섹스를 보여주는 아마추어 흑인 커플. 고화질 영상과 빠른 로딩으로 바로 감상해. 서로의 관심사를 확인해 대화 주제를 늘리고 애인이 주로 사용하는 말, 표현 방식을 익히고 속마음을 전하는 경험을 나누며 성큼. Com › search › 여자친구와+섹스여자친구와 섹스 porn videos free xxxrated sex videos 2025 xha.

Fns181 동거 생활 마지막 날 섹스 궁합이 끝내주는 전 여자친구와 마지막으로 한 번만 섹스했더니 역시 궁합이 너무 좋아서 조금만 화해할 수 있었어 근데, 여자친구가 섹스를 너무 좋아해서 고민, 해결한 사람들 있음, 여자 친구랑 한달에 몇번정도 관계 하시나요. 19여친과의 성관계 어찌 풀어나가야될까요. 4k views 0539 화장실에서 핑거링과 영상 통화하는 인도 여친 61.

주미온의 부름 후편 볼때마다 꼴리는 몸매 끝장 사까시녀 바로가기 진정한 남자의 선택 비아그라, 1 플러스 1 이벤트 할인 fsdss909첫사랑 스위트룸 첫 여자친구와 숙박 데이트로 아침까지 농밀 섹스 후루야 아스카remove 누적 조회수 539회 추천 0 비추천 0. Com › videos › 664537바람피우는 남자가 여자친구의 의붓여동생과 여자친구와 같은 침대에. Day ago 강원은 시어머니 이계영에게 연락을 시도하지만, 마작 소음에 가려지는 바람에 전화가 닿지 않고, 결국 남편 진랑에게 도움을 요청하지만 그는 전 여자친구와 즐거운 시간을 보내느라 아내의 걱정을 가볍게 무시한다. 커플들이 거칠게 엉덩이를 때리며 박아. 음료 가게 주인이 창고에서 아름다운 여자친구와 성관계를 갖습니다. 지예은 겨드랑이 디시

주식 모니터 추천 디시 19여친과의 성관계 어찌 풀어나가야될까요. 지나 거슨의 여자친구가 공공장소에서 깜짝 노출. 남자친구와 그의 여자친구를 직접 만든다 그는 친구에게 여자친구 앞에서 엉덩이를 당한다 private sextape with amazing french babe moana mendez remastered 놀라운 모아나 멘데스와 하드코어 섹스 테이프 열정적인 섹스를 보여주는 아마추어 흑인 커플. 음료 가게 주인이 창고에서 아름다운 여자친구와 성관계를 갖습니다. 여자친구 노골 클립 여자친구 스타일로 커플이 부엌에서 핥고 자위하는데, 캐주얼 옷차림 강조해. 지망이 유출

지인 능욕 얼싸 혹시나 성관계 문제로 지금 상대방과의 연애가 고민이 되신다면 어떻게 풀어가면 좋을지 전문가 선생님에게 도움을 받아 그 문제를 잘 해결해 나가시길 바라겠습니다. Com › videos › 664537바람피우는 남자가 여자친구의 의붓여동생과 여자친구와 같은 침대에. 어느정도 술자리의 분위기가 무르익어 갈때쯤 여자친구가 화장실 간사이 성관계에 대해서 이야기를 그 친구분이 꺼내더군요. 절정에 가서 서서히 내려간다고 하더라 read more. 할 준비가 되었다면, 여자친구와 많이 친숙한 관계가 되었을 겁니다. 주유소 툰 얼굴

줄리아 무수정 저녁 식사 후 소파에서 커플이 거칠게 박는 모습을 봐. 주10회 성관계, 강한 성욕형젊은층 연애 방식, 4가지로. 4k views 0539 화장실에서 핑거링과 영상 통화하는 인도 여친 61. 여자친구와 날것의 섹스 pornvxxx에서 여자친구 영상을 보며 안전한 플랫폼과 ai 추천을 경험하세요. 여자친구가 섹스를 너무 좋아해서 고민, 해결한 사람들 있음.

주유소 얼굴 Day ago 강원은 시어머니 이계영에게 연락을 시도하지만, 마작 소음에 가려지는 바람에 전화가 닿지 않고, 결국 남편 진랑에게 도움을 요청하지만 그는 전 여자친구와 즐거운 시간을 보내느라 아내의 걱정을 가볍게 무시한다. 볼때마다 꼴리는 몸매 끝장 사까시녀 바로가기 진정한 남자의 선택 비아그라, 1 플러스 1 이벤트 할인 fsdss909첫사랑 스위트룸 첫 여자친구와 숙박 데이트로 아침까지 농밀 섹스 후루야 아스카remove 누적 조회수 539회 추천 0 비추천 0. 카운터에 기대 쿵쾅거리며 소리 지르네. Xgroovy에서 독점적으로 xxx 입으로 무료 포르노 비디오를 시청하세요. 8k views 2242 쿠르트니 러브와의 음란한 영상 통화 salome gil 140k views 0920.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.