Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

엔딩쪽 내용만 간략하게 적혀 있으니 캐릭터에 대한 상세한 점은 본인 항목을 참고하기 바란다. 서안 @seoahn28 님의 tiktok 틱톡 동영상 생활관에서 생긴일 ️2 교육 훈련병 여간부 군대 tiktok. Cant make it in person. Porn videos xxx comments on 여간부 서안.

트위터 젖통

《악의 여간부》悪の女幹部, evil woman executive는 일본의 루네소프트에서 발매한 windows용 에로게다.. 妤兒 建立的 原聲 小魚 歌曲。 在 tiktok 上觀看關於 原聲 小魚 的最新影片。.. 봉천군벌은 1928년까지만 하더라도 국민당 북벌군을 이끄는 장제스 와 첨예하게 대립했지만, 봉천군벌의 수장이자 중화민국 북양정부 육해공 대원수인 장쭤린이 관동군의.. 아 동정 지키려고 했는데 군인일때 지키기 힘들지 ㅎㅎ..

트위터 쿠주

생활관에서 생긴일️ 서안 군대 여간부 훈련병 교육.. Com’s videos with original sound real.. They post 8 videos in month and earn up to 546$ per post, yearly earnings could reach 52416$.. 妤兒 建立的 原聲 小魚 歌曲。 在 tiktok 上觀看關於 原聲 小魚 的最新影片。..

트위터 코스어

제3지대 여성대원은 본부구호대활동 및 전방위 공작활동과 공작대 연락원 등으로 활동하고 서안 총사령부 복무와 초모 및 선전활동을 했다. 94 likes, tiktok video from keshafoxx1216 @foxxykesha. 엔딩쪽 내용만 간략하게 적혀 있으니 캐릭터에 대한 상세한 점은 본인 항목을 참고하기 바란다. 장쉐량 은 봉천군벌 의 수장인 장쭤린 의 아들로서, 거의 독립왕국이었던 만주와 20만 병력의 동북군을 물려받은 대군벌이었다.

트위터 해

1940년 11월 시안에 한국광복군총사령부 서안판사처西安辦事處가 설치되고, 이듬해 1월 시안을 중심으로 활동하던 한국청년전지공작대가 광복군 제5지대로 편입되면서, 여군복을 입고 광복군 창립식에 참가하였다. 연료 보급 때문에 중국 산동성 유현에. 이스라엘군은 하마스가 있는 곳 이스라엘군 간부, 갑자기 다가오더니 연합뉴스 yonhapnews.

다룸회라는 이름은 ‘물건을 다루다’에서 가져온 명칭이라고 한다. 👑🤩 não fique de fora dessa, 지난 28일 채널a 등 일부 매체는 육군이 숨진 훈련병에게 얼차려를 지시한 여성 중대장.

트위터 툴 야동 Com › @foxxykesha › videokeshafoxx1216 @foxxykesha’s videos with contains staying. 850 likes, 72 comments. 《악의 여간부》悪の女幹部, evil woman executive는 일본의 루네소프트에서 발매한 windows용 에로게다. Med school day in my life. 여 끌어내오는 것이 그러한 방법이었다. 트윗랭

트위터 영상 누르면 광고 서안 is a tiktok micro influencer with 13 videos and a normal engagement rate 3. They post 8 videos in month and earn up to 546$ per post, yearly earnings could reach 52416$. 1940년 11월 시안에 한국광복군총사령부 서안판사처西安辦事處가 설치되고, 이듬해 1월 시안을 중심으로 활동하던 한국청년전지공작대가 광복군 제5지대로 편입되면서. May may may suara asli template for you trending template. 독립운동인명사전 한국독립운동정보시스템. 트위터 자위 리트윗

트위터리트윗늘리기 발매 초기에는 포스터의 날카로운 눈매나 거유 때문에 부담스러워 거부감을 보이는 사람도 많았으나, 플레이 했던 유저들의 여러 호평이 이어짐에 따라 재발굴되면서 에로게의 스테디 셀러로 자리잡았다. Contains staying alive dj khalid rachel. Com’s videos with original sound real. Cant make it in person. 妤兒 建立的 原聲 小魚 歌曲。 在 tiktok 上觀看關於 原聲 小魚 的最新影片。. 티니 위미 디시

트위터 빈유 지난 28일 채널a 등 일부 매체는 육군이 숨진 훈련병에게 얼차려를 지시한 여성 중대장. 온라인에서는 가해자 보호라는 또 다른 논란이 일고 있다. 어린이집 체육대회 계주영상 주인공입니다 ㅎㅎ 군생활 할 때부터 묵묵히 성실하게 생활했던 대한민국 보물 1호️ 경찰에서도 안전하게 임무수행하세요. 게다가 인기에 힘입어 미연시로서는 드물게 확장판인 풀문 나이트까지 나왔으니 해보고 싶은 마음이 더욱 간절해지네요. 바이든 가자서안 팔레스타인이 통치해야학교 또 공습.

틔터 동영상순위 마리골드 산하의 브랜드 중 하나인 루네 에서 2010년 3월 26일 발매한 에로게. 고 서안총사령부 간부들이 제2지대의 구성원들이었다. 어린이집 체육대회 계주영상 주인공입니다 ㅎㅎ 군생활 할 때부터 묵묵히 성실하게 생활했던 대한민국 보물 1호️ 경찰에서도 안전하게 임무수행하세요. Com’s videos with original sound real. 여간부 서안 동영상 porn videos.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.