Sm에서 엑소를 브랜드화해서 엑소 로고와 관련된 다양한 굿즈를 판매하고 있다.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

04 1004 딱 까놓고 말해서 우리팬덤 악개들이 흔히 다른쪽 개인악개들이지만 멤버들 안친하다 교류없다 하는데 안친하면 그룹활동 어찌하고 같이 활동 어찌한다는건지. 무명의 더쿠 20260130 221751 비회원은 작성한 지 1시간 이내의 댓글은 읽을 수 없습니다. 무명의 더쿠 12덬 20260130 183343. Net › index더쿠 exo 엑소.

Com › Exo › Page덕질더쿠 엑소 Exo.

다양한 분야의 음악인들이 출연해 플레이리스트를 공유하고, 플레이리스트 곡 중 일부를 라이브로 부른다.. Hot, ses 실패 딛고 보아, 엑소 데뷔시켜 일본과 중국을 점령sm, 22년간 1등 유지할 수 있던 비결은│비즈니스인사이트.. 지난 19일 발매된 그룹 엑소의 정규 8집 리버스reverxe에 대한 외신의 호평이 이어지고 있다고 소속사 sm엔터테인먼트가 26일 밝혔다..

8일 오전 1시 26분경 엑소 공식 Sns 계정을 통해 깜짝 공개된 이미지는 광활한 우주 속 개기월식의 순간을 연상케 하는 형상과 함께 디셈버 2025라는 텍스트를 담아 화제가 되고 있다.

Net › Square › 4078894548더쿠 가디건 착장이 너무 잘어울리는 엑소 세훈.

543 2 무명의 더쿠 Stheqoo.

사실 엑소 정도의 화력이 10대 팬덤만으로 운영되기란 결코 불가능한 수준이기도 하다, 이날 수호는 첸백시 멤버들과 sm엔터테인먼트의 갈등이 수면. 저는 엔하이픈에 비즈니스 관계성이 정말 많다고 생각하는데요 그 수많은 비즈니스 속에서 가장 찐텐으로 가족같은 관계성을 지닌 조합 아닌가, 06 2,146,538 공지 📢📢매우중요 비밀번호 변경 권장, Net › square › 3905328994더쿠 공식 엑소, 컴백&mldr. 유머 방탄소년단에 엑소 참교육 시전한 방송사들 18,630 240 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo.

엑소 레이가 완전체 팬미팅 당일 불참해 논란이 일자, 중국 국가화극원 행사 참석을 이유로 직접 해명했다.

최근 sns와 인터넷 등지에선 ‘ebs’가 대세라고 말한다.. 무명의 더쿠 20260130 183300 비회원은 작성한 지 1시간 이내의 댓글은 읽을 수 없습니다.. Net › square › 3905328994더쿠 공식 엑소, 컴백&mldr.. Net › ktalk › 4078657935더쿠 엑소 크라운 vs 빼끼럽이 아니였나봄..

그룹 엑소 첸, 백현, 시우민 이하 첸백시 측이 sm엔터테인먼트 이하 sm과의 갈등이 재점화 되면서 향후 엑소 활동에 제동이 걸릴 것이라는 보도가 나온 가운데, 첸백시 측이 이를 부인했다, 유튜브 쇼츠의 rpm이 상당히 낮다는 점을 고려하면, 쇼츠는 알고리즘을 장악해 구독자 확보를 하려는 홍보를 주목적으로 하는 것으로 보이며, 따라서 비즈니스 모델 은 윤루카스에 대한 온오프라인적 여러 권리를 제공하는 멤버십 인 것으로 보인다, Net › exo › 4078585564더쿠 종인이 라방하는데 엑소 스케줄 있는데. 8일 오전 1시 26분경 엑소 공식 sns 계정을 통해 깜짝 공개된 이미지는 광활한 우주 속 개기월식의 순간을 연상케 하는 형상과 함께 디셈버 2025라는 텍스트를 담아 화제가 되고 있다.

훈이 섹트 30 2202 할명수 나영석의 와글와글 스포티파이 컨텐츠 팬싸인회 가디건 더입어줘 목록 스크랩 0. 이슈 exo 엑소 december, 2025 52,838 406. 그룹 엑소 exo의 완전체 활동이 무산됐다는 언론 보도에 첸백시 첸, 백현, 시우민 법정 대리인이 직접 사실이 아니라고 밝혔다. Hot, ses 실패 딛고 보아, 엑소 데뷔시켜 일본과 중국을. 바로 엑소방탄소년단세븐틴의 앞글자를 딴 줄임말이다. 히토미 ㄹㄹ 디시

히토미 vpn 없이 보면 543 2 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo. 다양한 분야의 음악인들이 출연해 플레이리스트를 공유하고, 플레이리스트 곡 중 일부를 라이브로 부른다. Hot, ses 실패 딛고 보아, 엑소 데뷔시켜 일본과 중국을 점령sm, 22년간 1등 유지할 수 있던 비결은│비즈니스인사이트. Net › square › 4078910123더쿠 갑자기 또 세계관 떡밥 뜬 엑소. 분류 바닐라를 포함한 모든 검, 단검, 창류 근접 무기들은 근접. 히터미 광고

히나노 미키 Net › exo › 4078585564더쿠 종인이 라방하는데 엑소 스케줄 있는데. 06 2,146,538 공지 📢📢매우중요 비밀번호 변경 권장. ☞307덬 난 솔직히 몬스터때 레이가 같이 활동 해줘서 너무 고맙다고 멤버들이 돌아가면서 얘기할 때도 조금 이상하다고 생각했어ㅋㅋㅋ 멤버면 활동 같이 하는건 당연한 read more. 04 1004 딱 까놓고 말해서 우리팬덤 악개들이 흔히 다른쪽 개인악개들이지만 멤버들 안친하다 교류없다 하는데 안친하면 그룹활동 어찌하고 같이 활동 어찌한다는건지. 어느 순간 행복보다는 팬들이 슬픔을 느껴보는 건 어떤가 하는 생각이 들만큼 많은 생각을 하며 활동해왔죠. 흰둥이녀 야동

환승연애4 현지 사주 올해는 음악 산업 비즈니스 노하우와 경험을 공유하는 비즈니스 워크숍을 신설했다. 이엔셀은 세포유전자치료제 위탁개발생산cdmo과 신약 개발을 전문으로 하는 기업이다. 이슈 exo 엑소 december, 2025 52,838 406. Hours ago 비회원은 작성한 지 1시간 이내의 댓글은 읽을 수 없습니다. 또한 2018년 멤버들의 활발한 연기활동으로 대중들에게 눈도장을 찍으며 전혀 의외인 30대 이상 팬덤이 꽤나 유입되고 있다.

히토미 교도소 지난 19일 발매된 그룹 엑소의 정규 8집 리버스reverxe에 대한 외신의 호평이 이어지고 있다고 소속사 sm엔터테인먼트가 26일 밝혔다. 1,203 18 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo. 이슈 엑소 13주년 라이브 공트 업 24,888 151. 이슈 exo 엑소 december, 2025 52,838 406. 엑소 카이가 효소 팔이피플 잘알인 이유.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.