오는 26일월부터 대한항공, 아시아나항공, 진에어, 에어부산, 에어서울의 국내선 및 국제선 항공편 기내에서 보조배터리의 사용이 금지됩니다.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

1 고객문의 성명, 회원번호, 이메일, 휴대폰 번호. 프로모션 코드 grouptochina 를 입력하고2인 이상 왕복 항공권을 예약하시면최대 10% 항공권 할인 혜택을 드립니다. 기타 홈페이지 이용 시 에어부산 홈페이지 이용과정에서 아래와 같은 정보들이 추가로 수집될 수 있으며, 개인정보보호법 15조에 따라 추가 수집이용됩니다. 슬로건은 fly smart이며, 한국어 슬로건은 여행의 지혜이다.

에어부산 승무원 양지수의 인스타와 기내식, 비행 정보.

얼마 전 워크돌에서 강력한 인상을 남긴 한 승무원바로 서비스 교관 양지수 승무원인데요예능이 아닌 본업의 모습.. 여행을 즐기는 최고의 방법을 만나보세요.. 에어부산 망한다 진에어 합병된다 하드만 지금 새 비행기도 잘 가져오고 운항승무원도 뽑는거 보면은 망할거 같지는 않은데 나만 그렇게 느끼는 건가..

마이너 설정 New 연관 글쓰기 차단 설정 머리말∙꼬리말 설정 Ai 이미지 간편 등록new 일반 에어부산 특가 취소 수수료 왜 생각보다 적지 일붕이 39.

다낭가는데 비엣젯이 더싸고 가격차이는 5만원.. 일반 에어부산 여기 기장님들 ‘진짜’인거 체험한 적 있음 ㅇㅇ220.. Com › board › nokanto해외 사이트를 통한 항공권 구매 시 유의사항에어부산, 진에어 공지.. 입대 전에 일본 가려는데 돈도 없고 어차피 비행기에서 그리 오래있는 건 아니니까 에어부산 끊었는데 많이 ㅄ같음..

Com › Mgallery › Board요 근래 항공뉴스 최고의 웃음벨은 에어부산 분리매각 요구인듯 항.

오리지널 사운드 에어부산 airbusan 에어부산 오지혜 대한항공 승무원 제주항공 승무원 에어부산 황지선 인스타 에어부산 양지수 스웨디시. 고성투어 프랑스 보르도 와인로드 10일에어프랑스. 23k followers, 1,924 following, 1,610 posts see instagram photos and videos from 양지수 @jisooyang_.

에어부산 On Instagram 31일부터 달라지는 보조배터리 기내.

Shift+enter 키를 동시에 누르면 줄바꿈이 됩니다, 에어부산지상직, 에어부산에서 후지산, 에어부산 채유지, 에어부산. 여행을 즐기는 최고의 방법을 만나보세요. 미국 교통보안청 tsa은 사전 보안검색을 위해 미국노선을 이용하는 모든 탑승객의 이름, 성별, 생년월일 정보 수집을 의무로 하고 있습니다. 에어부산은 1년에 2번 개씹혜자 이벤트를 진행함, 2007년 부산국제항공 으로 설립했으며, 본사는 부산광역시 강서구 유통단지1로57번가길 6에 있다.

에어부산승무원, 에어부산 지상직 승무원.

Com › airbusan에어부산 @airbusan instagram photos and videos. 1 고객문의 성명, 회원번호, 이메일, 휴대폰 번호, 인터넷 시스템 정기 작업으로 매일 23시 50분00시 10분까지 항공권 예매 및 여정변경환불 서비스가 제한되며, 매월 마지막 주 화요일 23시 00분00시 10분까지 시스템 정기점검 시간으로 홈페이지 이용이 불가하오니 이용에 참고하시기 바랍니다.

사브리나카펜터 노출 같은 시각 에어부산 bx8027 여객기는 활주로에서 이륙 과정에 있었다. 미국 교통보안청 tsa은 사전 보안검색을 위해 미국노선을 이용하는 모든 탑승객의 이름, 성별, 생년월일 정보 수집을 의무로 하고 있습니다. Com › airbusan에어부산 @airbusan instagram photos and videos. 원래는 8월 20일에 일본 노선 행사하고 8월 21일에 나머지 노선 행사함. Com › discover › 에어부산양지수tiktok. 비비커플 얼굴

블아 오프파코 Com › watch승무원을 교육하는 승무원 nmixx 해원에게 jmt를 시전한 교관 you. Com › mgallery › board에어부산 면접 후기 항공정비사 마이너 갤러리. 23k followers, 1,924 following, 1,610 posts see instagram photos and videos from 양지수 @jisooyang_. 미국 교통보안청 tsa은 사전 보안검색을 위해 미국노선을 이용하는 모든 탑승객의 이름, 성별, 생년월일 정보 수집을 의무로 하고 있습니다. 좌석 수는 한정되어 있으며, 선착순 마감됩니다. 빛베리 놀쟈

사브리나 움짤 도쿄에서 인천올떄는 에어부산탔는데 지연도 안하고 무엇보다 맘에들었던게 자리배정도 남성두분 몸아프신곳 없냐물어보면서 비상구좌석 배치해주고 좌석3개중에 2명만앉고 한자리는 사람없이가서 개편하게갔는데. 에어부산은 1년에 2번 개씹혜자 이벤트를 진행함. 같은 시각 에어부산 bx8027 여객기는 활주로에서 이륙 과정에 있었다. 원래 에어부산은 아시아나 계열사가 아니었음. Com › watch승무원을 교육하는 승무원 nmixx 해원에게 jmt를 시전한 교관 you. 사모예드 디시

비제이 유두 Shift+enter 키를 동시에 누르면 줄바꿈이 됩니다. 부산지역 상공인들이 올망졸망 모여서 만든 부산국제항공이라는 회사가 모태였고, 그래서 아직 에어부산에 부산지역 기업들 지분이 조금씩 들어가 있음. 에어부산 여객의 이륙이 조금만 늦었다면 두 항공기가 충돌하는 대형 사고로 이어질 수 있었다. 일반 에어부산 여기 기장님들 ‘진짜’인거 체험한 적 있음 ㅇㅇ220. Com › watch승무원을 교육하는 승무원 nmixx 해원에게 jmt를 시전한 교관 you.

브뤼셀 기차표 23k followers, 1,924 following, 1,610 posts see instagram photos and videos from 양지수 @jisooyang_. Com › mgallery › board해외 사이트를 통한 항공권 구매 시 유의사항 에어부산, 진에어 공지. 댓글닫기 새로고침 일붕이는 갤러리에서 권장하는 비회원 전용 갤닉네임입니다. 좌석 수는 한정되어 있으며, 선착순 마감됩니다. 따라서, 예매하실 때에는 또한, 해당 정보는 미국.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.