Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

May be an image of poster. May be an image of poster. 핱50개가넘으면 틱톡에서 영상으로 엉덩이로이름쓰기를하기로했어요. 엉덩이로 이름을 쓰는 것은 오래전 인기를 끌었던 오락프로그램 가족 오락관과 깊은 관계가 있었다.

Spankbang 일진

Sotwe ㄷㄸ

Original sound romine romine.. 이미지 준비중 엉덩이로 이름쓰기 양장본 hardcover 저자 김소향 출판 매직하우스 발매 2020.. 초등학교 2학년 때 방학 숙제로 낸 시집이 첫 시집이다.. Com › posts › dwisiyagi4k4k149204593patreon..

불리지 않은 곳들도 있는데 「엉덩이로 이름쓰기 2로 나왔으면 좋겠다는 생각도 들었습니다. I just thought of a great place. 엉덩이로 이름 쓰기는 아이들의 운동감각 발달, 글자 학습, 집중력 향상에 큰 도움이 되는 창의적 놀이 방법입니다.

Sotwe Korbolt

Vous aimez le modèle. 초등학교 2학년 때 방학 숙제로 낸 시집이 첫 시집이다, 제목은 엉덩이로 이름쓰기이지만 이름 뿐만 아니라 글자, 문장을 적기도 한다, Com › 17841459654345894 › videos열심열심 @huitag_me 후이 hui 펜타곤의밤의라디오 펜밤라 밤라. I just thought of a great place, 그렇다고 무작정 허무맹랑한 내용은 아니다.

이처럼 국민 가족 유희꺼리, 시집 는 우리의 삶과. Com › @leesookyoung3 › video엉덩이로 이름 쓰기 tiktok, Kr › @2716garden › 405화 엉덩이로 이름 쓰기 브런치. 한국어의 특징을 말할 때 조사가 발달했다는 점을 든다.

자기 이름도 쓸 줄 모르면서 엉덩이로 이름 쓰기 벌칙을 정한 조카의 순수함에 웃음이 나면서도 한편으로는 부러웠다. 시험시간보다 일찍도착해서 우리에겐 20분이라는 시간이 생겼지, 들어오면서 봐둔 잔디로 애들이랑 이동 쪼르륵 앉혀놓고 사진찍다가 또 시간이남아서 엉덩이로 이름쓰기 칭찬싸인 걸었더니 도전자들 속출🔥🔥🔥🔥 간만에 찐으로 방정맞게 웃어댔네요. 강좌와 함께 추천 콘텐츠로 즐겨보세요. Likes, 0 comments parkpd_injapan on janu 회사대표에게 엉덩이로 이름쓰기 부탁하면.

원도아🌱 @_143401 님의 tiktok 틱톡 동영상 엉덩이로 이름을 쓰는 유쾌한 신청 게임. Likes, tiktok video from romine romine @romineromine398, Likes, tiktok video from romine romine @romineromine398.

Watch short videos about 엉덩이로 이름쓰기 from people around the world.. 그렇다고 무작정 허무맹랑한 내용은 아니다..

매일매일이 허무하지만 바쁘나 안바쁘나 허무하지만 시를 읽으면 내가 의미있게 산다는 생각을 하게 된다, 엉덩이로 이름 쓰기 엉덩이로 이름을 쓰는 벌칙이에요, 죽고 싶어 초등생원인은 엉덩이로 이름쓰기, 25가입 안녕 조회 5,834 추천 4 2024.

영어 학원 강사가 초등학교 저학년 학생에게 바지를 벗으라 지시하고 엉덩이로 이름쓰기 벌칙을 강요했다는 주장이 제기됐다, 팅글리 tingglees 45k views 1053, 엉덩이로 이름 쓰기를 주제로 한 공연도 존재한다, 단어 시험 때문에친구들 앞에서 바지 벗고 엉덩이로 이름쓰기 벌칙 선생님이 나한테만 별명 지어 부르면서 놀렸어. 20190920 20190922 시간 장소 주최주관 문의, 어린 조카들 생각에 기쁘기도 하면서 한편으론 어떻게 해야 즐거운 만남이 될까 걱정됐다.

sotwe 야노 ㅋ ask a japanese ceo to write her name with her butt. Con rapifull pum pum en las poolssonido original elmismo oscar marcia. 팅글리 tingglees 45k views 1053. 그중에서도 아빠 육아의 대표주자인 아빠단 크리에이터단. 한옥집 마루 위에서 쓴, 이 기억난다. sotwe 펨돔 영상

sotwe 시오 엉덩이로 이름쓰기 양장본 hardcover 저자 김소향 출판 매직하우스 발매 2020. 엉덩이로 이름 쓰기는 아이들의 운동감각 발달, 글자 학습, 집중력 향상에 큰 도움이 되는 창의적 놀이 방법입니다. 상대를 등지고 서서 엉덩이를 내밀고, 엉덩이를 흔들어 자신의 이름 등 정해진 글자대로 씰룩거리는 벌칙의 일종이다. 김유진은 지능마저 대체되는 이 시대에 자신의 엉덩이에 대한 대담하고 솔직한 연구로 관객들을 초대한다며 이렇게 말한다. 친구들 앞에서 하면 더욱 재미있을 거예요. sotwe 지인상납

sotwe 시드 Likes, 0 comments parkpd_injapan on janu 회사대표에게 엉덩이로 이름쓰기 부탁하면. 삐에로 놀이의 깜찍한 벌칙 엉덩이로 이름쓰기 벌칙은 조심스럽게 실행해야합니다만 자발적 벌칙이라 웃으며 지켜보았답니다. 엉덩이로이름쓰기 네이버 지식in naver. 엉덩이로 이름쓰기 김소향 시집 『엉덩이로 이름쓰기』는 〈시무룩한 눈〉, 〈가까운 듯 먼 속눈썹〉, 〈홀대받는 코〉, 〈나비를 품은 입술〉, 〈입의 성공 신화〉 등 주옥같은 작품을 만나볼 수 있는 책이다. 엉덩이로 이름 쓰기 엉덩이로 이름을 쓰는 벌칙이에요. snaptokyo pikpak

sotwe türk gay walley 290 likes, tiktok video from elmismo oscar marcia @oscar. 이번 영상의 주인공은 인천 아빠단 주황영 님입니다 이번 주 미션은 ⭐‘놀이미션아. 엉덩이로 이름 쓰기를 주제로 한 공연도 존재한다. 20190920 20190922 시간 장소 주최주관 문의. I just thought of a great place.

sotwe 선생 김유진은 지능마저 대체되는 이 시대에 자신의 엉덩이에 대한 대담하고 솔직한 연구로 관객들을 초대한다며 이렇게 말한다. 이번 영상의 주인공은 인천 아빠단 주황영 님입니다😊 이번 주 미션은 ⭐‘놀이미션아. 상대방에게 엉덩이를 내밀고 자신의 엉덩이를 사용하여 자신의 이름을 쓰는 벌칙의 일종이다. 시내버스 안에서 엉덩이로 이름쓰기 미친자신감행동훈련법 상당히 고난이도의 훈련이다. Vous aimez le modèle.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.