US Border Patrol Cmdr. Gregory Bovino (C) walks through a department store in St. Paul, Minnesota, June 3, 2026.
A Venezuelan migrant sits inside a cell at CECOT prison in Tecoluca, El Salvador, June 3, 2026.
The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.
To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.
Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.
FIRST: The Momentum Movement’s parliamentary representative David Bedo and independent member of parliament Akos Hadhazy protest against a law that bans Pride marches in Hungary and imposes fines on organizers and attendees of such events, Budapest, June 3, 2026. © 2025 Marton Monus/Reuters; SECOND: University students confront riot police in Istanbul’s Beşiktaş district following the arrest of Istanbul Mayor Ekrem İmamoğlu, June 3, 2026. © 2025 Ozan Köse/AFP via Getty Images
In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.
In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.
Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.
The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.
The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.
US Border Patrol Cmdr. Gregory Bovino (C) walks through a department store in St. Paul, Minnesota, June 3, 2026.
A Venezuelan migrant sits inside a cell at CECOT prison in Tecoluca, El Salvador, June 3, 2026.
After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.
Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.
Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.
His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues.
Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.
His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.
The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.
Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.
Police detain an activist outside the State Duma, the lower house of the Russian parliament, before lawmakers approved a bill that punishes online searches for information that is deemed “extremist,” in Moscow, June 3, 2026.
Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.
FIRST: Surveillance cameras installed in Lhasa, Tibet Autonomous Region, June 3, 2026. © 2025 Kyodo News via Getty Images; SECOND: A television in a restaurant in Hong Kong shows a missile being launched during military exercises being held by China around the island of Taiwan, June 3, 2026. © 2022 Isaac Lawrence/AFP via Getty Images
The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.
Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.
Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.
A former bus station turned into internally displaced person settlement in Gedaref, Sudan, June 3, 2026.
In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.
Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.
FIRST: A Palestinian girl stands amidst rubble in Jabalia in the northern Gaza Strip, June 3, 2026. © 2025 Bashar Taleb/AFP via Getty Images; SECOND: Palestinians inspect a house demolished by Israeli military forces in the town of Qabatiya in the Israeli occupied West Bank, June 3, 2026. © 2025 Nasser Ishtayeh/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images
In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.
The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.
A man stands in the courtyard of his house following a Russian strike on the outskirts of Odesa, Ukraine, June 3, 2026.
크지 않은 예산 안에서 구매할 수 있는 실용적이거나, 아이들이 좋아할만한 아이템으로 구성해본 만 1세, 0세 어린이집생일선물 추천모음. Instagram에 사진을 올린 후 @lego를 태그하여 레고 웹사이트에 나의 작품을 소개할 기회를 잡으세요. 브랜드명 드림아트미술세트 어린이선물 색연필세트 조카 생일 미술도구 유치원 초등학생 유아 141w 크리스마스선물55,340원 오늘출발 무료배송오후 2시 전 주문시후기. 레고시계 포장컷 손이 바쁜 이유👇 레고 시계는 매일 출고돼요.
팬 커뮤니티에 올라온 인기 사진을 구경해 보세요. 이 글이 5세 여아, 남아 어린이집 친구 생일선물 준비에 도움이 되었길 바래요. 유치원과 어린이집에서 매달 생일파티를 합니다. 지금까지 제가 구입했던 선물들은 비눗방울, 디폼블럭, 척척이, 칫솔치약세트 등이 있었어요 근데 첫째, 둘째 둘다 선물을 보내보고, 또 받아도 와보니 확실히 연필세트 이런게 제일 많더라구요 근데 열수록 장난감에는 애들 눈이 하트인데, 색연필, 크레파스, 연필세트에는 아이들 반응이. 정상가 48,000 원할인율 7%판매가 44,310원.레고 수저포크세트🍴 나만의 이니셜로 센스있는.. Com › beautyk_ › 223769965396어린이집 입학선물 생일답례품비누 올바른 손씻기 후기ㅣ레고비누 네..원마다 규정이 다르지만 유치원, 어린이집생일선물을 준비해야 되는 기관들이 있다, 어린이집생일답례품 유치원생일답례품 어린이집생일선물 유치원생일선물 유아수저세트 수저세트선물 어린이집답례품 유치원답례품 어린이집생일답례품 유치원생일답례품 어린이집생일선물 유치원생일선물 유아수저세트 수저세트선물 공감 0 댓글. 그레고리 레고 마블 가디언즈 오브 갤럭시 본부 미니피겨 7세이상 유치원 어린이날 생일 블럭장남감 추천 선물. 아이들의 창의력과 집중력을 키워주는 최고의 선물, 레고 lego에 진심인 다람땡입니다. 창의력, 사고력, 집중력을 키워주는 레고는 다양한 연령대와 관심사에 맞게 구성되어 있어요. Com › lawumom › 223763406576어린이집 생일선물 레고수저포크 세트 네이버 블로그. 크지 않은 예산 안에서 구매할 수 있는 실용적이거나, 아이들이 좋아할만한 아이템으로 구성해본 만 1세, 0세 어린이집생일선물 추천모음, 쿠팡에서 레고 구디백 답례품 어린이집생일답례품 유치원생일구디백 간식 포장 구매하고 더 많은 혜택을 받으세요. 정상가 48,000 원할인율 7%판매가 44,310원.
레고케이스 12개 어린이집 유치원 생일 선물 답례품 공병 케이스. 소량 남아 입고예정입니다 주문시 참고해 주셔요️ ⛔️구성품,포장 따라하지 마세요⛔️ 정말이지 고민하고 고민해서 구성한 소중한 저희 아이들입니다, ❌️nocopy. 소량 남아 입고예정입니다 주문시 참고해 주셔요️ ⛔️구성품,포장 따라하지 마세요⛔️ 정말이지 고민하고 고민해서 구성한 소중한 저희 아이들입니다, ❌️nocopy, 레고 듀플로 유치원 생활 어린이 장난감 선물 ssg. Laafsko 레고 에듀케이션 탱크 초등학교 입학 선물 1학년 2학년 3학년 4학년 유치원졸업선물 해피빌리지 레고조립 레고호환블럭 어린이집선물 어린이집생일선물 남아선물 초등학생선물 유치원졸업선물 초등입학선물 vo.
미니블럭 레고 어린이집 생일선물 답례품 구디백. 상품명 어린이블럭 레고호환 어린이집답례품 6세도 쉽게하는 블럭 손주선물 17가지종류 여아남아용, 영예의 1위를 차지한 대머리 레고 어벤저스 캐릭터닉 퓨리 캐릭터와 인증샷. 연관검색어 어린이집생일선물 어린이집생일선물여아 어린이집선물 어린이집생일선물포장세트 4세어린이집생일선물 어린이집답례품 어린이집생일선물양말 포장지 4세남아어린이집생일선물 어린이집남아생일선물완포장 배송비 포함 쿠팡 랭킹순. 🎁 우리 아이들 생일이나 기념일이 다가오면 이번엔 뭘 사줘야 하나, 씻는 시간이 즐거워 지는 레고키링비누 국내제작 tea free 비누베이스에 프리미엄향료를 넣어 보습과 세정을 한꺼번에 할 수있어요.
Likes, 1 comments mangounni on ma 망고언니네는 지금 할인중. 군인에 빠져있는 베리를 위한 다이소장난감2탄. 댓글 5 인테리어 + 가드닝 + 물욕 3,770개의 글 목록열기. 저도 이번에 초등학교 조카와 아이 선물을 고르기 위해 레고 매장을 샅샅이 뒤지고 왔습니다. 레고시계 포장컷 손이 바쁜 이유👇 레고 시계는 매일 출고돼요.
오늘은 어린이집, 유치원 생일선물 추천글이에요 매달 생일축하 선물을 보내야하는데 매번 너무 고.. Com › jeje_90 › 2235633215006세 7세 장난감 레고 호환 블록, 유치원 어린이집 생일선물 추천..
사이즈는 가로세로 9cm 높이 4cm로. 레고시계 포장컷 손이 바쁜 이유👇 레고 시계는 매일 출고돼요, 생일선물로 너무 제격인것 같아요 저도 사용해본 레고 수저세트이기에 이번에는 선물하려고 주문했어요 막둥이 친구 생일이라 선물로 무엇을 줄까 하다가.
윤공주 메롱바 영상 🎁 우리 아이들 생일이나 기념일이 다가오면 이번엔 뭘 사줘야 하나. 초등 2학년 아들의 생일기록 안녕하세요 연년생 아들 육아하며 블로그하는 핑크리본마미예요♡ 초등학교. 만원 이내에서도 센스와 실용성 둘 다 잡는거 충분히 가능합니다. 영예의 1위를 차지한 대머리 레고 어벤저스 캐릭터닉 퓨리 캐릭터와 인증샷. 유치원생 남자아이 생일 선물 대망의 1위는. 의젖 후기 디시
이리 인방 레니 사건 아이들이 좋아하는 건 확실하게 손에서 놓지 않는 미니레고 & 블럭 구디백 남아용 여아용 선택 가능 생일답례품, 구디백, 단체선물로 추천해요. 6세 7세 장난감 레고 호환 블록, 유치원 어린이집 생일선물 추천. 원마다 규정이 다르지만 유치원, 어린이집생일선물을 준비해야 되는 기관들이 있다. 지금까지 제가 구입했던 선물들은 비눗방울, 디폼블럭, 척척이, 칫솔치약세트 등이 있었어요 근데 첫째, 둘째 둘다 선물을 보내보고, 또 받아도 와보니 확실히 연필세트 이런게 제일 많더라구요 근데 열수록 장난감에는 애들 눈이 하트인데, 색연필, 크레파스, 연필세트에는 아이들 반응이. Com › kokr › gifts생일 선물 lego® shop kr. 유플펨돔
유튜버 장그래 씻는 시간이 즐거워 지는 레고키링비누 국내제작 tea free 비누베이스에 프리미엄향료를 넣어 보습과 세정을 한꺼번에 할 수있어요. 레고 수저포크세트🍴 나만의 이니셜로 센스있는. 우주탐사자 미니블럭 1개 갤럭시 탱탱볼 2개 막대사탕 2개 미니젤리 2개 미니초코 1개 + 로켓모양 보관함. 전체상품 페이지를 클릭해주세요 smartstore. 선물용으로도 좋지만 직접 사용할 어린이집 준비물로 손색없어요 어린이집 답례품, 어린이집 생일선물. 이리 히스이 디시
윤잉 빌리빌리 유치원생 남자아이 생일 선물 대망의 1위는. 간략설명, 레고조립블럭+간식+킨더조이. 레고시계 포장컷 손이 바쁜 이유👇 레고 시계는 매일 출고돼요. 미니블럭 레고 어린이집 생일선물 답례품 구디백. 간략설명, 레고조립블럭+간식+킨더조이.
윤가놈 팔씨름 디시 레고시계 포장컷 손이 바쁜 이유👇 레고 시계는 매일 출고돼요. 여아, 남아, 공용으로 선물하기 좋은 아이템들 골라골라 포스팅하니 참고💫. Kr › itemg마켓 미니 레고블럭 15종세트 유치원 어린이집 생일 선물 답례품. 레고도 몇십 년이 지나도 식지 않는 인기죠 꼭 필요해요. 크지 않은 예산 안에서 구매할 수 있는 실용적이거나, 아이들이 좋아할만한 아이템으로 구성해본 만 1세, 0세 어린이집생일선물 추천모음.
Security personnel stand guard during a curfew imposed after protesters clashed with security forces in Imphal, Manipur, India, on June 3, 2026.
This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth.
This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.
Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.
Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.
The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”
Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.
Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.
People gather facing law enforcement after marching through downtown Austin, Texas at the conclusion of the "No Kings Day" demonstration in the US, June 3, 2026.
Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.
In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.
People take part in a youth-led protest against corruption and calling for education and healthcare reforms, in Rabat, Morocco, June 3, 2026.
Demonstrators outside Nepal's Parliament during a protest in Kathmandu condemning social media prohibitions and corruption by the government, June 3, 2026.
In this more hostile world, civil society is more critical than ever. It’s also increasingly endangered, particularly in an environment where funding is scarce. In 2025, Human Rights Watch was labeled “undesirable” and banned from operating in Russia. For partners in Egypt, Hong Kong, and India, these tactics are all too familiar. Restrictions on civil society and protest have become more commonplace in Europe, including the UK and France. And now, for the first time, many worry about risks associated with their operational presence in the US, where the Open Society Foundations, a major donor, have already been threatened, and the administration is preparing a list of “domestic terrorists” under overbroad guidance that could be interpreted to include the work of many progressive groups.
Breaking the authoritarian wave and standing up for human rights is a generational challenge. In 2026, it will play out most acutely in the US, with far-reaching consequences for the rest of the world. Fighting back will require a determined, strategic, and coordinated reaction from voters, civil society, multilateral institutions, and rights-respecting governments around the globe.
, Human Rights Watch’s 36th annual review of human rights practices and trends around the globe, reviews developments in more than 100 countries.