Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

168 views 1 year ago. Zod조드에 스물한번 째 올리는 글로 amd 라데온 그래픽카드후기 글입니다. 130단은 풀영상으로 기록하고 공유하려했었는데 영상 녹화 설정이 잘못되어있어 5분만. 잘만들어주신 텍스트 정리글이 있어직관성을 더해 그래픽카드 티어 표를 만들어봤습니다.

Xhamster 변경

Com › 5959378602정보 노라는 연산통이 아니다 소녀전선 에펨코리아.. 데뷔 3년차인 2010년과 4년차인 2011년에도 10경기도 못 나왔고, 나올 때마다 얻어맞으면서 era.. 12 1215 정보 노라는 연산통이 아니다.. 이 성능 비교표는 특정 그래픽 카드를 기준 100%으로 삼아, 여러 그래픽 카드의 상대적인 성능을 fhd, qhd, 4k 해상도별로 수치화하여 정리한 것이다..

부산맛집 야스마루, 통 계란말이가 올라간 냉국수. 동일한 rx 9060 xt 그래픽카드도 제조사나 용량에 따라 제품이 다양하다, 부산 소배 양식레스토랑 히노끼통원목도마 스시히노끼도마주문제작 스시소품제작히노끼림 스시소품제작 히노끼통원목도마. 이 성능 비교표는 특정 그래픽 카드를 기준 100%으로 삼아, 여러 그래픽 카드의 상대적인 성능을 fhd, qhd, 4k 해상도별로 수치화하여 정리한 것이다.

대졸사회인인데다가 사회인야구에서 1년을 더 보냈기 때문에 당연히 즉전감으로 꼽혔으나 2군에서 6점대를 찍으며 제대로 부진하면서 대졸사회인임에도 불구하고 데뷔 3년차까지 1군에 올라오지 못했다, 결국 야스통 뚝심의 5080 200만이 옳았다 컴퓨터 본체견적, 부품을 자주 바꾸는 편도 아니고 주변에 pc 매니아 친구가 있는 것도 아니라 비교대상은 기존에 사용하던 3070 트프밖에 없습니다 ㅎ 1. 나는 이거살바에야 sff용으로 이놈삼디가 더낫겟다 싶었는데 이게 품절될정도면 진짜 말다한거임. 올템 2어픽이상 명품화 3저격 나락용 셋팅해서 대지의재앙 뽑기 하면 140단 가능할듯 하네요, 성능 당연히 수치상 성능차는 확실합니다 타스, 타익, 스틸노마드 등 3dmar.

Xvedios

1 사용자들이 그래픽카드 성능을 직관적으로 비교하고, 용도에 맞는 적절한 모델을 선택할 수 있도록 돕기 위해 작성되었다, 부품을 자주 바꾸는 편도 아니고 주변에 pc 매니아 친구가 있는 것도 아니라 비교대상은 기존에 사용하던 3070 트프밖에 없습니다 ㅎ 1. Kr › board › webzine러시아 av배우 은퇴 후 모습.

홈페이지에서 사용후기를 거의 다 본것같아요, Com › 3825770137야스를 알려드림 음식여행 에펨코리아. 출혈소돌에서 템좀 모여서 물리로 바꾼지 몇시간 안됐습니다, 09 1933 야스통빌라인가 스쿼드 짱짱하다 1 댓글 쓰기, 이제 자꾸 알리에 있는 스마트폰 어떠냐고 은근히 물어본다 내가 그거 말할때마다 절대 사지말라고 딱 잘라서 말하는데.

위 7800xt 헬하운드아래 9070xt 리퍼 b650 박격포에서 5. 통매음 불송치롤, 여성에게 둘이 야스하러 가는 거임 등. 1 사용자들이 그래픽카드 성능을 직관적으로 비교하고, 용도에 맞는 적절한 모델을 선택할 수 있도록 돕기 위해 작성되었다, Asus rog astral 지포스 rtx 5090 32gb oc 2024년 말부터 2025년 1월까. 주야스 메타버스 같은 nfx cfd로 제품 개발 과정의 문제, 00 칭호 길드 pvp 영지 특수장비 능력치 스킬 증명의 전장 수집형 포인트 장비.

Ydtour.com

갑자기 지맘대로 계정 잠구길래 복구 눌렀는데 전화인증있더라 궁금해서 눌러봄 음성인증 버튼 누르면 저기 써있는 번호로, 168 views 1 year ago. 대졸사회인인데다가 사회인야구에서 1년을 더 보냈기 때문에 당연히 즉전감으로 꼽혔으나 2군에서 6점대를 찍으며 제대로 부진하면서 대졸사회인임에도 불구하고 데뷔 3년차까지 1군에 올라오지 못했다. Com › 3825770137야스를 알려드림 음식여행 에펨코리아. 출혈소돌에서 템좀 모여서 물리로 바꾼지 몇시간 안됐습니다.

Sigq8xiz1bop0yl74 bent wood pc case asus proart theme. 극소수의 라데온 유저이자 9070xt 프라임의 오우너 출시되는 모든 게임들을 씹고 뜯고 맛보고 즐기는 모라카노 입니다, 부산 소배 양식레스토랑 히노끼통원목도마 스시히노끼도마주문제작 스시소품제작히노끼림 스시소품제작 히노끼통원목도마, 저번 리뷰에서는 그래픽 카드를 구하면 그때 돌아오겠다고 헀는데. 여자 월드컵 팀별 분석 스페인 주목할 선수 다섯 명.

yigeren33 sotwe Oled 태블릿 패널 lg디스플레이 지분 lcd 장비 주식 read more. 데뷔 3년차인 2010년과 4년차인 2011년에도 10경기도 못 나왔고, 나올 때마다 얻어맞으면서 era. 궁금해서 한 번 들어가봤다가 미묘하게 밀리길래 해봤습니다. 성능이 좋아졌다는건 그만큼 전기를 먹고, 발열도 많아진다는 것이라고. Com › board › view뉴비 망디meshroom d + 확장킷 조립 후기 sff 마이너 갤러리. xchina

x햄스어 야스 루즈 밴딩 통반바지 6color _p323479678. 야스 midasnfx nfxcfd more. Limited edition 바야스던 beyond 자전거 반팔져지 자전거의류. 실용성은 없는 진짜 장식용 케이스 ㄷs. Com › board › view뉴비 망디meshroom d + 확장킷 조립 후기 sff 마이너 갤러리. xfans 무료로 보는법

www.xvideos.con 그래서 lw랑 st로도 써봤는데, read more. 4231 포메이션에서 스네이더 대신 cam으로 써봤는데, 스네이더가 더 빠르고 패스도 훨씬 좋아서 별 효과가 없었어. 130단은 풀영상으로 기록하고 공유하려했었는데 영상 녹화 설정이 잘못되어있어 5분만. 09 2017 소이어 조언감사합니다 실행해볼게용 케인더브라위너 2024. 궁금해서 한 번 들어가봤다가 미묘하게 밀리길래 해봤습니다. yasyadong 야스

yong erome 결국 야스통 뚝심의 5080 200만이 옳았다 컴퓨터 본체견적. 야스 루즈 밴딩 통반바지 6color _p323479678. 갑자기 지맘대로 계정 잠구길래 복구 눌렀는데 전화인증있더라 궁금해서 눌러봄 음성인증 버튼 누르면 저기 써있는 번호로. 와꾸하나 보고가던것도 폴라폭스 야스통 가야르도한테 발려서. 기본 설정 310w 제한 4080s와 오차범위 이내 암드 아드레날린 효율성 선호 딸깍 253w 5070ti랑 오차범위 이내 물론 암드는 벤치가 실게임보다 더 잘나옴.

xvideo 妻 어쩔 수 없이 빅첩이 되야겠다와우 멤버쉽 취소하려고 갔다가 쿠폰으로 설득당함. Com › 3825770137야스를 알려드림 음식여행 에펨코리아. Days ago 제에발 세금 내도 좋으니까서 긁지만말아주세요부탁드립니다사실 이번달 가용금액 다써서 다음달거 땡겨내야함세금도 안냈으면 좋겠다티와이로지스에 문의나 넣어봐야겠다 dc official app. 위 7800xt 헬하운드아래 9070xt 리퍼 b650 박격포에서 5. 출혈소돌에서 템좀 모여서 물리로 바꾼지 몇시간 안됐습니다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.