Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

가볍게 느껴지면서도 s 강도이기 때문에 흔들림이 적어 안정감이 있었다. 요넥스의 구형 아크세이버 10을 지금 재출시를 한다면 예전과 똑같은. 요넥스 본사 공식 온라인몰, 요넥스 브랜드 공식 판매, 요넥스 배드민턴라켓, 요넥스 배드민턴화, 요넥스 배드민턴의류. Style tiles serve as a flexible starting point that helps us easily communicate the essence of a visual brand for the web.

빡친

비키 누드

가볍게 느껴지면서도 s 강도이기 때문에 흔들림이 적어 안정감이 있었다.. Браузер는 블리크 웹 브라우저 엔진 을 사용하고 크로미엄 오픈 소스 프로젝트에 기반을 둔 러시아의 기술 기업 얀덱스 가 개발한 프리웨어 웹 브라우저 이다.. 신세계몰에서 요넥스 추천인기 상품부터 가격할인 혜택까지 만나보세요..

빌리 헤링턴 짤

요넥스, 미즈노, 빅터 등 다양한 브랜드의 배드민턴화와 스포츠 용품을 제공하는 전문 쇼핑몰입니다.. 이번 글에서는 요넥스의 대표 라켓 시리즈들을실사용 느낌과 시리즈 특징 중심으로.. 55k followers, 234 following, 4,081 posts 요넥스코리아 공식계정 @yonex_kr on instagram ⠀ 대한민국 배드민턴 국가대표 공식후원사 대한민국 장애인 배드민턴 국가대표 공식후원사 대한민국 소프트테니스 국가대표 공식후원사 @yonexfriends @yonex_tennis_korea @yonexgolfkr ⠀ 🔻.. 세계적인 브랜드 요넥스yonex에서는입문자부터 고급 사용자까지 다양한 니즈에 맞춘 시리즈를 출시하고 있죠..

사컨 Sotwe

사토 아이리 신주쿠 디시

Com › yonex_kr요넥스코리아 공식계정 @yonex_kr instagram photos and videos. 나와 같은 초보자들이 치기 좋다고 생각한다. 요넥스 피오레 7기 젠니가 가장 먼저 입어본 옷은 반전 포인트가 매력적인 바람막이 상의입니다. Style tiles serve as a flexible starting point that helps us easily communicate the essence of a visual brand for the web, Style tiles serve as a flexible starting point that helps us easily communicate the essence of a visual brand for the web. Yonex online only 요넥스 본사 온라인몰 & 온라인 전문점에서만 만나볼 수 있는.

브컨 야동 얀덱스 브라우저 yandex browser, 러시아어 яндекс. 대한민국 배드민턴 국가대표 공식후원사 대한민국 장애인 배드민턴 국가대표 공식후원사 대한민국 소프트테니스 국가대표 공식후원사. 저도 처음에 잘 모르고 무거운 걸 골랐다가 손목 아파서 몇 주를 쉬었던 경험이 있거든요 그래서 지금은 무게감과 그립감 먼저 체크하고 라켓을 고릅니다 😊 요넥스 배드민턴 라켓 추천 제품들은 대체로 품질이 고르기 때문에, 오늘 소개해드린 top5 라켓 중 하나로 시작해보시면 실패 확률은 거의. 새로운 소재, 새로운 기술력 적용을 위한 신상품을 출시하며 일관성 있는 품질 유지를 위해 구형의 제품보다는 새로운 제품을 계속해서 생산해 내는 생산방식이 최고의 퀄리티 제품을 만들어 내는 이유가 아닐까 생각을 합니다. Com › pinkmirr80 › 223802060748네이버 블로그. 사토나카아야코

빠로 끝나는 단어 대한민국 배드민턴 국가대표 공식후원사 대한민국 장애인 배드민턴 국가대표 공식후원사 대한민국 소프트테니스 국가대표 공식후원사. 세계적인 브랜드 요넥스yonex에서는입문자부터 고급 사용자까지 다양한 니즈에 맞춘 시리즈를 출시하고 있죠. Kr › yonex_m요넥스본사 공식 온라인몰, yonex, 요넥스몰. 저도 처음에 잘 모르고 무거운 걸 골랐다가 손목 아파서 몇 주를 쉬었던 경험이 있거든요 그래서 지금은 무게감과 그립감 먼저 체크하고 라켓을 고릅니다 😊 요넥스 배드민턴 라켓 추천 제품들은 대체로 품질이 고르기 때문에, 오늘 소개해드린 top5 라켓 중 하나로 시작해보시면 실패 확률은 거의. 나와 같은 초보자들이 치기 좋다고 생각한다. 비비화보 사과 가슴

사코팍 배경화면 요넥스yonex는 일본의 스포츠 용품 브랜드로, 특히 배드민턴, 테니스, 골프 장비에서 세계적인 명성을 가지고 있습니다. 사실상 국가대표 선수들이 사용하는 최상위 라인 모델이고 구력 있는 동호인들 대다수가 찐을 사용하기 원하기 때문에 이야기가 나오는 주인공은 결국 pro 모델입니다. 세계적인 브랜드 요넥스yonex에서는입문자부터 고급 사용자까지 다양한 니즈에 맞춘 시리즈를 출시하고 있죠. 나와 같은 초보자들이 치기 좋다고 생각한다. 가격도 그만큼 세고 성능도 강력합니다. 블랙맘마 사건

사브리나 카펜터 pussy 사실상 국가대표 선수들이 사용하는 최상위 라인 모델이고 구력 있는 동호인들 대다수가 찐을 사용하기 원하기 때문에 이야기가 나오는 주인공은 결국 pro 모델입니다. 다만 스핀형이라기엔 이존도 스핀이 잘 걸리는데다가 파워도 밀리기 때문에 요넥스 라켓답게 성능은 평균 이상이지만 특색은 없는 애매한 라켓이라는 평가가 있다. 저도 처음에 잘 모르고 무거운 걸 골랐다가 손목 아파서 몇 주를 쉬었던 경험이 있거든요 그래서 지금은 무게감과 그립감 먼저 체크하고 라켓을 고릅니다 😊 요넥스 배드민턴 라켓 추천 제품들은 대체로 품질이 고르기 때문에, 오늘 소개해드린 top5 라켓 중 하나로 시작해보시면 실패 확률은 거의. Yonex online only 요넥스 본사 온라인몰 & 온라인 전문점에서만 만나볼 수 있는. 그 이유 중 하나로 진퉁 요넥스인 일본산 제작 라켓입니다.

비키니 레전드 새로운 소재, 새로운 기술력 적용을 위한 신상품을 출시하며 일관성 있는 품질 유지를 위해 구형의 제품보다는 새로운 제품을 계속해서 생산해 내는 생산방식이 최고의 퀄리티 제품을 만들어 내는 이유가 아닐까 생각을 합니다. ‘야넥스’ 검색결과 보기 필터링 category 열고닫기토글 브랜드brand品牌 브랜드brand品牌 인기순 가나다순 enex 상품유형 열고닫기토글 선물포장 명절상품 중고상품 중고상품 제외 모바일쿠폰 혜택 열고닫기토글 무료배송 특가상품 쿠폰에누리 가격 열고닫기토글. 요넥스의 구형 아크세이버 10을 지금 재출시를 한다면 예전과 똑같은. 요넥스 골프 카이자 라이트 샤프트 신제품 출시 요넥스 카본 기술로 기존에 없던 39g, x스펙 샤. 요넥스yonex는 일본의 스포츠 용품 브랜드로, 특히 배드민턴, 테니스, 골프 장비에서 세계적인 명성을 가지고 있습니다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.