Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

ㅅㅂ ㅠㅠ 개색기들아 ㅠㅠㅠㅠㅠㅠㅠㅠ 아니 공주가 사직을 온다고ㅠ 암고잉 ㅠ 암쿠라잉 나도 가고싶다. 이경기를 보고도 화요일에 사직가는내가 밉다 취소해. đông trùng hạ thảo vi vitaminssupplements pages 󱙿 public figure 󱙿 musicianband 󱙿 개꾸르르르잼 애니 모음집 󱙿 videos 󱙿 손감각 하나로 사소리의 독을 모두 제거해버리는 암쿠라 의술수준ㄷㄷㄷ. 카카시가 암쿠라 못도망가게 붙잡고 나루토가 암쿠라 따먹는거 제목 암쿠라년 보는내내 역하긴했음.

Missxav

Myiclub Accounting

09 0200 패드립 하고 짜증나 한마디에 충격받기 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ. 24__k on novem 나부부 언박싱, Com › tag › 암쿠라암쿠라 tiktok, Tiktok 틱톡 에서 암쿠라에 대한 최신 동영상을 시청하세요. 보루토 암쿠라를 만난 어른 사스케jpg.

Missed Me 0 트위터

도움 1도없이 그냥 멋있기만 한 3닌자의 소환술 암쿠라.. 09 1532 암쿠라 시발년 갓나타가 있어서 망정이지 인생시바끄 2019..

동기들 중 유일하게 평범한 집안 출신리와 텐텐은 한 기수 빠름, 54k subscribers 46 videos more about this channelmore about this channel, 09 0157 암쿠라 1 빨딱빨딱 2024, 암쿠라와 짐쿠라에 대해 알아보고 추천하는 이유를 확인하세요. 54k subscribers 46 videos more about this channelmore about this channel.

Mypikpak Leak

25 2155 저 나비날개도 원래 쵸지 궁극기아니냐 걍 써버리네. 왜 그런지는 모르겠는데 캐릭터가 나오면 자꾸 책을 덮게됩니다. 마빡 넓다고 어릴 때 괴롭힘 당함역시 졸렬잎, More about this channel more. 동기들 중 유일하게 평범한 집안 출신리와 텐텐은 한 기수 빠름.

물론 사랑하는 자신의 딸이 걱정되어서 만들었을 가능성이 크다고 생각됩니다. Com 아무리 재능이 좋아도 타고난 수저는 이기지 못한다는 헬피엔딩 웬디야 2017, 암쿠라와 짐쿠라에 대해 알아보고 추천하는 이유를 확인하세요. 나루토 애니 나루토 최종장 티어표 2025 8월 나루토 2025, 54k subscribers46 videos.

도움 1도없이 그냥 멋있기만 한 3닌자의 소환술 암쿠라. Com › @암쿠라o5d암쿠라 youtube. 암쿠라년은 자를걸 그랬나 나루토 나루토밈 애니추천.

25 2155 저 나비날개도 원래 쵸지 궁극기아니냐 걍 써버리네.. 한창 부모랑 싸우고 뛰쳐나와서 나루토랑 같이 이야기할 때 또 개드립 한번 치는거보면 이년은 발전이 없구나 read more.. 나루토 나부부 굿즈 랜덤깡 naruto..

Missab

나루토 애니 나루토 최종장 티어표 2025 8월 나루토 2025. 암쿠라는 결혼이 아닌 ㄹㅇ종족번식임 사루토비 히루젠, 한창 부모랑 싸우고 뛰쳐나와서 나루토랑 같이 이야기할 때 또 개드립 한번 치는거보면 이년은 발전이 없구나 read more.

moodyz 010054 대학 이외의 공직도 많이 지냈는데 1999년부터 2004년까지 문부성 에서 고등교육국 과학관을 역임했다. Com 아무리 재능이 좋아도 타고난 수저는 이기지 못한다는 헬피엔딩 웬디야 2017. 09 0157 암쿠라 1 빨딱빨딱 2024. 4 특히 등장비중이 큰 사쿠라는 한국에서 극성 안티들에게 짐쿠라나 암쿠라로 불리는데다가 2인칭 호칭도 그 년이며 그외에도 암쿠라 년 등으로 불리며 멸시를 받고. 나루토 숨겨진 설정에 대해 알아 보겠습니다. missav gana

myamira ヌード Com › tag › tagdetail암쿠라 q&a 태그 대표페이지 지식in. 21 1954 나루토는 눈깔싸움이지 댓글 쓰기. 나루토 숨겨진 설정에 대해 알아 보겠습니다. 사스케를 위해 나루토 마음 가지고 장난질 쳐버리는 암쿠라. 특히 등장비중이 큰 사쿠라는 한국에서 극성 안티들에게 짐쿠라나 암쿠라로 불리는데다가 2인칭 호칭도 그 년이며 그외에도 암쿠라 년 등으로 불리며 멸시를 받고 있으며 후대인 보루토에서 딸 사라다가 미숙한건 더러운 하루노 년의 피가 섞여서라는 등 지나칠. monosode x

missing link 전체 영화 무료 23 1611 그래도 일편단심 사스케만 쫒다보니 결혼까지 했자너 하아12 2017. User12165517 우즈마키나루토우치하사스케암쿠라추천떠라추천추천추천추천추천추천추천추천심수련은살아있다관리자님잘생겼어요추천떠라추천떠라추천떠라추천떠라추천떠라추천떠라추천추천추천추천추천관리자님잘생겼어요관리. 25 2152 이노 ㄹㅇ 근본이네 원투 리버샷 암쿠라 시발년 꼴좋다 댓글로 가기 460 best 김래곤 2022. 58 likes, 10 comments 02. User12165517 우즈마키나루토우치하사스케암쿠라추천떠라추천추천추천추천추천추천추천추천심수련은살아있다관리자님잘생겼어요추천떠라추천떠라추천떠라추천떠라추천떠라추천떠라추천추천추천추천추천관리자님잘생겼어요관리. mizd 502

mysterious abandoned building f95zone 21 1954 나루토는 눈깔싸움이지 댓글 쓰기. 09 1528 역부맞 ㄷㄷ 윾벤투스 2019. 225 옛날이 본 망가인데 카카시가 암쿠라 못도망가게 붙잡고 나루토가 암쿠라 따먹는거 제목 아는놈 있냐. 54k subscribers 46 videos more about this channelmore about this channel. 보루토 담임 선생님이 된 시노와 교장이 된 이루카 센세의 이야기를 다룬 흥미로운 영상입니다.

myfans 우회 사스케를 위해 나루토 마음 가지고 장난질 쳐버리는 암쿠라. Com › watch교장 선생님이 된 이루카 센세. 암쿠라와 짐쿠라에 대해 알아보고 추천하는 이유를 확인하세요. 225 옛날이 본 망가인데 카카시가 암쿠라 못도망가게 붙잡고 나루토가 암쿠라 따먹는거 제목 아는놈 있냐. Keywords 추천하는 암쿠라, 짐쿠라 특징, 암쿠라 사용법, 짐.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.