Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

이것도 후반에 먼치킨되긴하지만 그건 무협이면 마지막에 천하제일인되는건 뭐ㅇㅇ. 혹시라도 초반에 조금 지루해도 참으세요. 기녀 에게서 아비가 누구인지 모른체 태어났지만 본것들은 모두 기억하는 천재인 적화린은 어머니가 색마에 의해서 음기를 뺏기고 죽게되자 이제 8살인 그는 계략과 속임수를 사용해서 그색마를 죽여 버리고 색공을 훔쳐 익혀가게 됩니다. Tvis 유승범, 20억 빚진 이후브라질 청년, 아들로 품어 특종세상 디시트렌드 6관왕 김혜윤, 살목지 기대감이세영김태리도 눈길 이해인, 노출 피아노로 141만 유튜버 등극.

Boko877 Sotwe

오래전에 읽었을 땐 색다른 느낌이 들어서 보게 된 소설입니다. Com › books › 425000738악마전기 판타지 e북 리디, 갓태어난 아기들과 힘없이 몸파는여인들 강호에 악마가 태어났다. Com › mgallery › board진지충이 추천하는 소설 악마전기 장르소설 마이너 갤러리.

Bj 사과 가슴

안녕하세요 제닐입니다 ㅎ 워낙 오랜만이군요 ㅅ 시험기간이라 늦장좀 부려봣습니다 ㅋ 백천유작가님 솔직히 네임벨류가 높은작가님은 아니지만 요번악마전기는 매우 수준높은 수작이라고 생각합니당 시험전에 잡앗는데 솔직히 엔딩에 약간 휴우증이 생기더군요 뭐 제목에서 보다싶이. 태어나자마자 이지 理智가 있었으며, 자신만의 철저한 각본대로 움직였습니다. 화 완결, novel, 무협, 마교, 먼치킨, 줄거리 더 이상 강호에서 협의를 논하지 마라.

엊그제 트젠 커밍아웃 화보찍음ㅋㅋ 왜 존못흑인 같이 생겼냐고 하는데 로버트 드니로가 존나 못생긴 흑인 여자만 만나는 이상성욕자여서 그렇다함 아빠 리즈때랑 비교하면 read more, 사람에게서 난 자식이지만 사람의 자식이 아니라 악마 惡魔였던 자의 이야기. 진지충이 추천하는 소설 악마전기 장르소설 마이너 갤러리.

Bj Ssuzi

라니스의 아내 광부 관리자 중 한명인 라니스의 아내, 혹시라도 초반에 조금 지루해도 참으세요. Com › mgallery › board악마전기 리뷰 장르소설 마이너 갤러리. 신고를 보이지 않는 학교로 초청해 악마 소환 방법을 알려주며 솔로몬의 피리를 줬다, 자신의 이름을 감추며 살면서 강함을 동경하며 강해지기 위해선 모든지 하는 잔인함. 연관 갤러리 00 갤주소 복사 이용안내.

더 이상 강호에서 협의를 논하지 마라.. 진짜 악마 무협소설악마전기 7완결 무협소설.. 목걸이 투사체 스킬 붙으면 전기불꽃 투사체 많아지는건가요.. 악마전기 진짜 재밌었는데 ㅋㅋ 무협 갤러리..

Com › books › 425000738악마전기 판타지 e북 리디. 연관 갤러리 00 갤주소 복사 이용안내. 예를 들면 단칼에 보스가 죽는다는 지 평점 610 이미지 준비중 악마전기 1 저자 백천유 출판 문피아 발매 미등록, 더 이상 강호에서 협의를 논하지 마라. Com › board › view악마전기 후속작에 적화린 나옴.

연관 갤러리 00 갤주소 복사 이용안내, Com › titif2001 › 222693123754무협 악마전기 소설 리뷰⬅ 네이버 블로그. 무갤러는 갤러리에서 권장하는 비회원 전용 갤. 그런데 5권 이후로는 상대를 때려잡는데 아쉬운 장면이 좀 read more. Com › board › view악마전기 읽은사람.

bamel 디시 악마 악마 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요. 악마전기 다시 보고싶은데 흠 00110. 작가가 대놓고 양판소다 하는 것처럼 확실히 양판소. 흔히들 악인무협하면 전륜마도나 악마전기 패륜겁을 추천하던데 패륜겁은 전륜마도나 악마전기와 비할바가 아니네요. Com › novel › detail악마전기 단행본 네이버 시리즈. bj채채 폭로

baddslayer Com › mgallery › board진지충이 추천하는 소설 악마전기 장르소설 마이너 갤러리. 그대가 만약 협俠과 의義를 자신의 분신인 양 받드는 자라면. 라니스의 아내 광부 관리자 중 한명인 라니스의 아내. 악마전기 작품소개 지금부터 무시무시하고 사악邪惡한 이야기가 시작될 것이다. 리뷰 진지충이 추천하는 소설 악마전기 ㅇ. bj쏘리 근황

bj소이 안녕하세요 오늘은 백천유 작가님의 악마전기 라는 작품을 가져왔습니다. 주인공처럼 존나나쁜놈인데 주위사람들은 다착한줄알고 관심가져주다가 통수치고 짱먹는 소설같은거없음. 내가 본 최고의 무협소설은 악마전기임. 흔히들 악인무협하면 전륜마도나 악마전기 패륜겁을 추천하던데 패륜겁은 전륜마도나 악마전기와 비할바가 아니네요. 기녀 에게서 아비가 누구인지 모른체 태어났지만 본것들은 모두 기억하는 천재인 적화린은 어머니가 색마에 의해서 음기를 뺏기고 죽게되자 이제 8살인 그는 계략과 속임수를 사용해서 그색마를 죽여 버리고 색공을 훔쳐 익혀가게 됩니다. buena243

baerasoni asmr 갓태어난 아기들과 힘없이 몸파는여인들 강호에 악마가 태어났다. Com › books › 425000738악마전기 판타지 e북 리디. Mf없음 주의기존의 전기불꽃 세팅을 어느 정도 아신다는 전제하에 설명할게요. 악마전기 진짜 재밌었는데 ㅋㅋ ㅇㅇ115. 개인적으로 외전도 추가적으로 나왔으면 하는 거랑, 액션씬에 있어서 너무 설명이 적다는 게 마이너스 포인트이다.

bj시하 그대가 만약 협俠과 의義를 자신의 분신인 양 받드는 자라면. 일단 기본적으로 공략에 들어가기에 앞서서 인퍼널악마빌드에 대해서 전혀 모르는 상태라면 반드시. 악마전기 천재적인 주인공에다가 사악한 주인공에다가 성장물. 그가 태어난 순간 밤하늘의 별들이 숨을 죽였다. 악마전기는, 주인공의 개성이 좋은데, 적화린의 악행에만 집중해서 나머지 요소들이 다 죽은 느낌이었어요.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.