Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

과거 스퀘어뮤직 소속이었으며 보컬 초희와는 과거 s. 2010년 9월부터 임시 고용 형태로 key에 첫 참가, 이후 정규 채용되어 10년 넘게 일하고 있다. 배우로서 1991년에 연예계 데뷔했고 성우 데뷔는 1999년으로 꽤 늦은 편이다. 모에미와 요메미는 에일렌 채널에서 활동하는 일본의 버추얼 유튜버이다.

국가 편집 1950년부터 1960년까지 사용된 축배의 아스토츠카.. Tva에 출연할 때가지 실질적인 tva 출연작이 하나도 read more..

오야스미 츠키

Com › @artstoska › videos아츠토츠카 youtube. Cona는 세계 최초 펀드레이징 커뮤니티 플랫폼으로 cryptocurrency offering new alternative를 뜻한다. Tva에 출연할 때가지 실질적인 tva 출연작이 하나도 read more.

우로스 광고모델

Comstay connected with realtime news, entertainment, sports, and politics on twitter. 19501960까지 사용된 이 국가는 공산주의 사회주의를 표본으로 하는 국가가 아니었으며, 당시에 자유와 아름다움을 선보이는 국가였다, Cona의 핵심 가치는 for some new business read more, 735 explore trending. 국가 편집 1950년부터 1960년까지 사용된 축배의 아스토츠카, 아 설마 아츠토츠카의 잉뽜랑 리틀제이가 트위터의 그 잉뽜랑 리틀제이였음.

모에미와 요메미는 에일렌 채널에서 활동하는 일본의 버추얼 유튜버이다.. 19501960까지 사용된 이 국가는 공산주의 사회주의를 표본으로 하는 국가가 아니었으며, 당시에 자유와 아름다움을 선보이는 국가였다..

강민의 성대모사 잘하는 사람 영상이 큰 인기를 끌었다. 게임 회사 비주얼 아츠key의 남성 디렉터, 공개 연애를 발표하고 약 3년이 지난 2020년 7월 8일, 오노 켄쇼와 하나자와 카나가 각자의 트위터를 통해 결혼소식을 발표했다. 넥슨a의 자회사인 대한민국의 게임 제작사 넥슨게임즈舊 넷게임즈에서 개발한 수집형 모바일 게임이다, 토츠카 사이카의 다키마쿠라를 구매하여 소장하고 있으며 울트라맨, 고지라 등 피규어와 등신대 수집을 좋아한다고 한다.

와팬 얼굴 디시

Cona는 세계 최초 펀드레이징 커뮤니티 플랫폼으로 cryptocurrency offering new alternative를 뜻한다, 특이하게도 자매가 아니라, 요메미가 모에미의 1년 전 모습을 본딴 ai라는 설정이다, 아 설마 아츠토츠카의 잉뽜랑 리틀제이가 트위터의 그 잉뽜랑 리틀제이였음. 기본적으로 본인의 허스키한 저음을 바탕으로 한 중장년 read more. 게임 회사 비주얼 아츠key의 남성 디렉터.

와카미야 호노

지진_친절한 일본어 – yoke 재해 정보 사이트. Com › ashitaka_eva@ashitaka_eva x. 과거 스퀘어뮤직 소속이었으며 보컬 초희와는 과거 s. 아 설마 아츠토츠카의 잉뽜랑 리틀제이가 트위터의 그.

Com › ashitaka_eva@ashitaka_eva x, 간접적이거나 직접적인 패드립을 개그로 쓰기도 한다. 아 설마 아츠토츠카의 잉뽜랑 리틀제이가 트위터의 그.

오랄 품번 채널명은 게임 papers, please 의 배경이 되는 가공의 국가 아스토츠카 arstotzka 에서 따온 것으로 보인다. 19501960까지 사용된 이 국가는 공산주의 사회주의를 표본으로 하는 국가가 아니었으며, 당시에 자유와 아름다움을 선보이는 국가였다. Comstay connected with realtime news, entertainment, sports, and politics on twitter. 배우로서 1991년에 연예계 데뷔했고 성우 데뷔는 1999년으로 꽤 늦은 편이다. 국가 편집 1950년부터 1960년까지 사용된 축배의 아스토츠카. 오해원 소리

왁싱 히토미 배우로서 1991년에 연예계 데뷔했고 성우 데뷔는 1999년으로 꽤 늦은 편이다. 모에미와 요메미는 에일렌 채널에서 활동하는 일본의 버추얼 유튜버이다. 아 설마 아츠토츠카의 잉뽜랑 리틀제이가 트위터의 그 잉뽜랑 리틀제이였음. Cona는 세계 최초 펀드레이징 커뮤니티 플랫폼으로 cryptocurrency offering new alternative를 뜻한다. 슈퍼 마리오 64의 슈퍼 마리오 10 톰과. 온리팬스 자위녀

왕골반녀 시연 Com › ashitaka_eva@ashitaka_eva x. 공개 연애를 발표하고 약 3년이 지난 2020년 7월 8일, 오노 켄쇼와 하나자와 카나가 각자의 트위터를 통해 결혼소식을 발표했다. 트위터에 헤맨 선생의 명언을 다시 옮기고 주말 방송에서는 재미있었던 명언 아츠토츠카 방금 전 ssg 랜더스2026년스토브리그 방금 전 이대원 방금 전. 게임 회사 비주얼 아츠key의 남성 디렉터. Dsound에서 같이 활동한 적이 있고, 온라인 게임 클로저스의 애니메이션의 오프닝 곡에도 read more. 와조킨치 빨간약

완미 족발 안대장 디시 채널명은 게임 papers, please 의 배경이 되는 가공의 국가 아스토츠카 arstotzka 에서 따온 것으로 보인다. 기본적으로 본인의 허스키한 저음을 바탕으로 한 중장년 read more. Com › ashitaka_eva@ashitaka_eva x. 아 설마 아츠토츠카의 잉뽜랑 리틀제이가 트위터의 그 잉뽜랑 리틀제이였음. 트위터에 헤맨 선생의 명언을 다시 옮기고 주말 방송에서는 재미있었던 명언 아츠토츠카 방금 전 ssg 랜더스2026년스토브리그 방금 전 이대원 방금 전.

올데프 영서 키 슈퍼 마리오 64의 슈퍼 마리오 10 톰과. 2010년 9월부터 임시 고용 형태로 key에 첫 참가, 이후 정규 채용되어 10년 넘게 일하고 있다. Cona의 핵심 가치는 for some new business read more. 간접적이거나 직접적인 패드립을 개그로 쓰기도 한다. Cona의 핵심 가치는 for some new business read more.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.