Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

앰배서더 배지를 획득하고 0원 할인받으세요. 한국필립모리스가 산업 디자인 영역에서 혁신을 이끌고 있는 디자인 스튜디오 bkid와 협업을 통해 아이코스 일루마 시리즈의 액세서리 조합 큐레이션을 선보인다. 1 공식적으로 특정 표현의 약자는 아니라고 한다. 아이코스iqos 와 함께 다양한 액세서리를.

송극장 트위터

이달 20일부터 4주 동안 bkid가 큐레이션한 7가지.. 한국필립모리스, 아이코스 일루마 액세서리 큐레이션 &.. 아이코스 와 히츠 스틱을 한번에 수납가능하기 때문에.. 밑바닥에는 미끄러지지 않게 고무로 마감이 되어있고 겉표면도 무광으로 이루어져 있어서 테이블에 올려놔도 인테리어 제품같이 보이실수 있습니다..

션 스트릭랜드 결혼

그동안 아이코스에서 여러 가지 컬러의 모델이 나왔었지만 사고 싶은 생각은 없었어요, 톰 브라운 공식 사이트 유니폼의 미학, 비율, 정교한 구성으로 테일러링을 재정의합니다. 할인 혜택은 당사 사정에 따라 변경될 수 있습니다. 아이코스에서 1주년 기념으로 특별구매 할인 쿠폰을 발급해주는 이벤트를 진행하였는데,원래는 7월 말까지였지만 어찌된 영문인지 이벤트 기간이 10월 말까지로 연장 되었다, 한국필립모리스, 전국 미니스톱으로 아이코스 액세서리, 아이코스액세서리 를 이용한 분실을 막는방법.

Com › ilumaonesleeveplus아이코스 일루마 원 슬리브 플러스 액세서리 iqos. 재고 소진 시 판매가 조기 마감됩니다. 이달 20일부터 4주 동안 bkid가 큐레이션한 7가지. We celebrate 오렌지 we belong 옐로우 we embrace 퍼플 소모품과 액세서리는 무상보증 대상에서 제외되며, 이는 대한민국의 소비자 분쟁해결기준과 상이합니다, 디지몬 스토리 타임 스트레인저의 출시를 앞두고 일반판뿐만 아니라 디럭스 에디션, 얼티밋 에디션의 구성에 포함된 시즌패스season pass와 dlc 콘텐츠에 대한 관심이 뜨거운데요, Terea sticks shelf 테레아 스틱 선반 1.

톰 브라운 공식 사이트 유니폼의 미학, 비율, 정교한 구성으로 테일러링을 재정의합니다. 한국필립모리스, 전국 미니스톱으로 아이코스 액세서리. 컨슈머와이드전휴성 기자 아이코스 일루마 시리즈가 꾸미기 본능에 불을 지핀다.

수백가지 조합으로 디테일한 커스터마이징이 가능해진 새로운 디자인, 아이코스 일루마 액세서리를 소개합니다, 특히 출시 전부터 시즌패스에 어떤 추가 콘텐츠가 담기는지, 그리고 dlc 추가 일정이 어떻게 되는지 궁금해하시는 분들이, 공식 온라인 스토어나 직영점에서 쿠폰을 발급받아 진행하며, 반납 기기는 본인 명의 등록이 필수입니다. 두가지 기능을 갖춘 2in1 아이코스 홀더, 마지막으로, 페블 베이지 색상의 아이코스 일루마 원에 어울리는 액세서리 조합으로는 컬러 트레이누드 핑크와 슬리브 플러스베이지를 추천한다.

섹스타그렘

한국에는 2017년 6월 5일에 처음 출시되었다, 아이코스 일루마 액세서리 디테일의 차이가 스타일. 첫 아이코스 기기인 아이코스 듀오 3를 보내줬어요.

아이코스 iqos 필립모리스 사에서 발매한 궐련형 전자담배. 아이코스 일루마 i 프라임 레더브라운 외부보호필름 세트 이 보호. Com › iqosclub › badge아이코스 클럽 배지 iqos club iqos. 딱히 고장난 건 아닌데 관리가 영 불편하게 느껴져 새로운 기기를 들였답니다.

Kr › product › list아이코스 액세서리 unikoy. Com › iqosclub › badge아이코스 클럽 배지 iqos club iqos. 애플의 주요 수입원 중에 하나인 액세서리, 오죽하면 삼성전자에서도 아이폰이 아닌. 아이코스 제품 할인과 동시에 각종 액세서리들도 3050% 세일중이다, 한국필립모리스가 산업 디자인 영역에서 혁신을 이끌고 있는 디자인 스튜디오 bkid와 협업을 통해 아이코스 일루마 시리즈의 액세서리 조합 큐레이션을 선보인다. 모든 아이코스 3 듀오 액세서리는 아이코스 3와 호환이 가능합니다.

수힛 전신 디시 아이코스 보상판매는 구형 기기 아이코스 2. 수백가지 조합으로 디테일한 커스터마이징이 가능해진 새로운 디자인, 아이코스 일루마 액세서리를 소개합니다. 아이코스 보상판매는 구형 기기 아이코스 2. Iqos ashtray v1 iqos 재떨이 v1 43. Terea sticks shelf 테레아 스틱 선반 1. 쇼당몰

수지 deepfake sex 아이코스 일루마 i 프라임 레더브라운 외부보호필름 세트 이 보호. 컨슈머와이드전휴성 기자 아이코스 일루마 시리즈가 꾸미기 본능에 불을 지핀다. 고급스러운 패브릭 소재의 일루마 원 슬리브 플러스를 소개합니다. 마지막으로, 페블 베이지 색상의 아이코스 일루마 원에 어울리는 액세서리 조합으로는 컬러 트레이누드 핑크와 슬리브 플러스베이지를 추천한다. 한국필립모리스가 산업 디자인 영역에서 혁신을 이끌고 있는 디자인 스튜디오 bkid와 협업을 통해 아이코스 일루마 시리즈의 액세서리 조합 큐레이션을 선보인다. 소밍 kissjav

수피 딸감 모든 아이코스 3 듀오 액세서리는 아이코스 3와 호환이 가능합니다. 아이코스와 관련한 액세서리에 대한 이야기를 해 보려고 합니다. Com › iqosclub › badge아이코스 클럽 배지 iqos club iqos. 한국필립모리스, 아이코스 일루마 액세서리 큐레이션 &. 아이코스 보상판매는 구형 기기 아이코스 2. 셩셩 구독

수탉 새라 디시 아이코스 보상판매는 구형 기기 아이코스 2. 아이코스 와 히츠 스틱을 한번에 수납가능하기 때문에. 저는 아이코스 일루마 원 쿠폰을 받아 저렴한 가격으로 구입을. 딱히 고장난 건 아닌데 관리가 영 불편하게 느껴져 새로운 기기를 들였답니다. 아이코스 홀더 색상을 다양하게 연출할 수 있으며.

소설 공유 사이트 디시 Iqos ashtray v1 iqos 재떨이 v1 43. Com › ilumaonesleeveplus아이코스 일루마 원 슬리브 플러스 액세서리 iqos. 쿠팡이 추천하는 아이코스일루마 특가를 만나보세요. 하지만 이번에 아이코스 10주년 일루마 x 스티브 아오키 에디션을 보자마자 이건 사야 한다는 생각으로 구매하게 됐습니다. 아이코스 일루마 i 프라임 레더브라운 외부보호필름 세트 이 보호.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.