Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

오늘도 1+1으로 아이코스 60정 재구매를 갑니다. 🚗💕 제주렌트카 찾으시는 분들께, 뉴대한렌트카는 제주공항에서 8분 거리라 픽업도 빠르고, 카시트 옵션도 다양하게 준비되어 있어요. I 아이코스 일루마 i iqos iluma 186 views1 year ago. Com › @iqoskorea아이코스 iqos korea youtube.

나는야꼬등어

깐숙 낭루

나시쿤

일상을 다르게 경험한다는 것, 궁금하지 않나요.. 쿠팡이 추천하는 아이코스 특가를 만나보세요..

아이코스 최저가 상품 가격비교와 함께 핫딜검색, 할인혜택, 특가 정보를 확인하세요, 아이코스 아이코스 일루마 아이 프라임 미드나잇 블랙 iqos iluma i prime midnight black, 스마트코어 인덕션 시스템으로 처음부터 끝까지 균일한 즐거움을 선사하는 아이코스 뉴스와 이벤트를 확인하세요, 쿠팡이 추천하는 전자담배 아이코스 관련 혜택과 특가, Days ago 이제 다시 아이코스를 복용하면서 내 삶의 변화를 beginnings로 거슬러 올라가기 시작한 시대를 맞이했습니다, Com › madeinvao › 223627641168아이코스 종류 총정리 및 사용후기.

김채원 개꼴

천천히 올라가면서 보이는 풍경이 정말 인상적이다, 아이코스 아이코스 iqos 라고 함 아이코스는 담배 및 담배가 없는 니코틴을 포함한 제품과 함께 사용하도록 설계된 가열식 담배 기기 라인이다. 아이코스 아이코스 일루마 아이 프라임 미드나잇 블랙 iqos iluma i prime midnight black. 0 아이코스 비교 후기 사용하기 가장 좋았던 제품 추천 존재하지 않는 이미지입니다. 아이코스 아이코스 iqos 라고 함 아이코스는 담배 및 담배가 없는 니코틴을 포함한 제품과 함께 사용하도록 설계된 가열식 담배 기기 라인이다. 아이오유 레스토랑은 단순한 데이트 맛집으로서의 역할을 넘어서 공간 대관 서비스도 운영하고 있어요.

김태향 부르마

이러한 요소들이 아이코스의 소비자 참여 전략에서 어떤 역할을 하며, 어떻게 브랜드의 글로벌 커뮤니티와 더 깊은 연결을 촉진하나요. 아이코스 일루마 액세서리는 아이코스 일루마 i 해당 기기와 호환되며 그 반대의 경우도 마찬가지입니다, 요즘 판매중인 아이코스 종류는 어떤게 있는지 알아봤더니 3가지가 있더라고요.

나마모노 아이코스 일루마 i 원 알루미늄 바디 비중이 더 높아 고급스러운 느낌이 강합니다. 아이코스 일루마에 대한 유용한 정보, 최신 뉴스와 이벤트를 확인하세요. 새 댓글 foodie 11개의 글 목록열기. 아이코스iqos라고 함 아이코스는 담배 및 담배가 없는 니코틴을 포함한 제품과 함께 사용하도록 설계된 가열식 담배 기기 라인이다. 아이코스 위키백과, 우리 모두의 백과사전. 김해 빙그레 생산직 디시

나카다시 뜻 자주 찾는 질문 아이코스 일루마 액세서리와 일루마 i 액세서리는 호환되나요. 스트레스와 긴장감, 그리고 체력 문제를 극복해 주었던 아이코스에 감사합니다. 그런데 전용 스틱인 히츠가 단종되기도 했고, 1년 넘게 사용하니 슬슬 바꿔야겠더라고요. 한국 아이코스 공식 유튜브 채널에 오신 것을 환영. 리뷰 아이코스 일루마 i 원 가성비 좋고 예쁘기까지, 이제는. 나리땽 결혼 디시

나가하마 패션헬스 아이코스 아이코스 iqos 라고 함 아이코스는 담배 및 담배가 없는 니코틴을 포함한 제품과 함께 사용하도록 설계된 가열식 담배 기기 라인이다. 아이코스에 대한 검색 결과는 총 14 개입니다. 0 아이코스 비교 후기 사용하기 가장 좋았던 제품 추. 아이코스상품명 아이코스 일루마 i 원 전자담배 기기 아이코스 일루마 i 원 전자담배 기기. 캐빈 정원 수는 6명으로 탑승 시간은 15분 소요된다. 김채연 쌩얼

깐숙 본명 자주 찾는 질문 아이코스 일루마 액세서리와 일루마 i 액세서리는 호환되나요. Com › choi › contents한강뷰 레스토랑 끝판왕 마포 아이오유 레스토랑 데이트 맛집 완벽한. 60k followers, 7 following, 105 posts iqos korea @iqosofficial_kr on instagram 본 계정은 한국에 거주하는 만 19세 이상 성인 흡연자만을 위한 계정입니다. 전자담배기기유형 궐련형색상 제이드그린, 골든카키, 브론즈토프, 옵시디언블랙. 이 정도면 현지인들은 저체온증으로 죽는 경우도 있답니다 호핑오실 때 바람막이나 겉옷을 챙겨오시는 게 아주 좋습니다.

김성은 야동 아이코스 일루마 원 전체적으로 무난한 디자인이며, 플라스틱 비중이 조금 더 느껴지는 편입니다. 아이코스iqos라고 함 아이코스는 담배 및 담배가 없는 니코틴을 포함한 제품과 함께 사용하도록 설계된 가열식 담배 기기 라인이다. 스트레스와 긴장감, 그리고 체력 문제를 극복해 주었던 아이코스에 감사합니다. 쿠팡이 추천하는 아이코스 특가를 만나보세요. 쿠팡이 추천하는 아이코스 관련 혜택과 특가.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.