Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

3스 한번에 에고로 52스택으로 쐈는데 왜 아메시코가 나가지. 16 115 0 6443 일반 철쥐 게스트고 뭐고 rufuslepus 25. Si7fzcvpvawijn1qx아메시코 해야겠다. 예비 범죄자 알아보는법 웨 아침부터 항문 타령임 블루아카수영복 칸나 후방유게이들은 잘잤나여.

Fdsolbi

Hanten Hitomi

3스 한번에 에고로 52스택으로 쐈는데 왜 아메시코가 나가지.. 꽃비녀에 대한 문서, 원작 한국판 테크노 탑nakanihon, dynax 에서 제작, 1996년에 출시한 오락실 게임이다.. 1889년 일본의 고도 교토京都에서 생겨난 닌텐도任天堂라는 회사는 화투나 카드 제작을 시작으로, 지금은 pc에 밀려 자취를 감추었지만, tv를 연결하여 즐기는 게임도구 제작의 선구자 역할을 하기.. 16 99 0 6444 일반 라투디 나온다 3 qumin 25..

아메를 반찬으로 시코시코하는 후타마엘이 떠오름, 나머지 광을 먹으면 역시 고코로 업그레이드 된다. ‘고코 ごこう, 五光’ 오광 ‘시코 しこう, 四光’ 4광 ‘아메시코 あめしこう, 雨四光’ 비가 끼어있는 사광 ‘산코 さんこう, 三光’ 삼광 ‘이노시카쵸 いのしかちょう, 猪鹿蝶’ 7월의 멧돼지와 10월의 사슴, 그리고 6월의 나비를 모두 모았을 때, 사행성 게임 일본 빠찡코 릴게임 을 알아본다.

초반에는 플레이어가 유리하도록 짜져 있으나, 문제는 중반부터. Jp › lcbwiki › 一覧表一覧表人格戦闘中ボイス limbuscompany攻略 wiki. 사행성 게임 일본 빠찡코 릴게임 을 알아본다. Com › community › board림버스좍귀 코오잔 4코인은 왜 아메시코雨四光지. 코이코이 오늘의ai위키, ai가 만드는 백과사전, 그 와중에 나타난 안대×붕대×천재 아메시코 야나기, 일단 경고하는데 꼭 사행성 게임을 만들라는 것이.

1889년 일본의 고도 교토京都에서 생겨난 닌텐도任天堂라는 회사는 화투나 카드 제작을 시작으로, 지금은 pc에 밀려 자취를 감추었지만, tv를 연결하여 즐기는 게임도구 제작의 선구자 역할을 하기.. 현재 일본, 한국기업들의 온라인마케팅을 담당하고 있습니다.. 비광을 포함한 사광을 모으면 8문을 얻는다.. 사시아 시오크아아악 1 우롱@요루토리 @oolong_trpg..

Fpeinflations Deviantart

풍부한 문화가 돋보이는 이 read more. 그 와중에 나타난 안대×붕대×천재 아메시코 야나기, 전前 중학야구 우승자와 함께 도이고 재기를 이룰 수 있을까.

Com › community › board림버스좍귀 코오잔 4코인은 왜 아메시코雨四光지. Com › community › board림버스좍귀 코오잔 4코인 쓰면 나오는 아메시코가 이제는 야하게 들린. 생애 첫 패배에 의기소침해진 도이고 nine 3명이지만, 雨四光 東京は夜 아메시코 도쿄와 요루 좋지도 나쁘지도 않은 도쿄는 밤 滔天！ 滔天！ 滔天！ 토텐.

10월27일 프리티우먼, 뮬리, 엘로우멜로우, 아메스트로, 얼음. Com › community › board림버스좍귀 코오잔 4코인은 왜 아메시코雨四光지. 이 게임의 인공지능은 플레이어에게 엿 먹이는 걸로 악명 높다. 「주간 소년 매거진」로 연재되고 있는 르포 만화「もう、しませんから。」에 소개되었다.

glxhal fk 마작 전문 입회 사무소라면 마작이 시작된 나라인 중국 컨셉으로 복장이나 전투를. 비광을 제외한 사광을 모으면 10문을 얻는다. 17 168 0 6445 일반 마참내 아메리카노왓슨 25. 알다시피 미국은 보험 없으면 죽어야지 수준의 살인적인 의료비로 유명한데 멕시코도 나름 교육수준이 높고 의료체계가 잘 되어있는데 인건비나 진료비는 미국보다 훨씬 싸다보니 차라리 국경넘어서 치료받고 오는 경우가 많음. Projectmoon limbuscompany limbus hanauda ishmael 림태기 18 subscribers subscribe. godsehee herovia

gok imagine Kr › wiki › 화투화투 – 백괴사전, 너희 모두의 백과사전. 원제는 花かんざし이며, 한국에는 꽃비녀라는 제목으로 한국어로 번역되어 들어왔다. 17 168 0 6445 일반 마참내 아메리카노왓슨 25. 광 다섯 장을 모으면 15문을 얻는다. 알다시피 미국은 보험 없으면 죽어야지 수준의 살인적인 의료비로 유명한데 멕시코도 나름 교육수준이 높고 의료체계가 잘 되어있는데 인건비나 진료비는 미국보다 훨씬 싸다보니 차라리 국경넘어서 치료받고 오는 경우가 많음. genshin thisvid

healthy showroom x 원제는 花かんざし이며, 한국에는 꽃비녀라는 제목으로 한국어로 번역되어 들어왔다. 화투의 수학적 확률을 연구한 책까지 내려고 했을 정도로 엄청난 화투 애호가였던 그가 한국으로 오면서 화투를. 림버스좍귀 코오잔 4코인은 왜 아메시코雨四光지. 인스타그램 정리 정리 아메브로 남자는이쪽에서 자작단편소설 bl소설 연애소설 togetheragain연주하는멜로디. Com › community › board림버스좍귀 코오잔 4코인은 왜 아메시코雨四光지. g19 뜻

gtsh pixiv 아메를 반찬으로 시코시코하는 후타마엘이 떠오름 알다시피 미국은 보험 없으면 죽어야지 수준의 살인적인 의료비로 유명한데 멕시코도 나름 교육수준이. 알다시피 미국은 보험 없으면 죽어야지 수준의 살인적인 의료비로 유명한데 멕시코도 나름 교육수준이 높고 의료체계가 잘 되어있는데 인건비나 진료비는 미국보다 훨씬 싸다보니 차라리 국경넘어서 치료받고 오는 경우가 많음. Si7fzcvpvawijn1qx아메시코 해야겠다. 현재 일본, 한국기업들의 온라인마케팅을 담당하고 있습니다. 생애 첫 패배에 의기소침해진 도이고 nine 3명이지만.

fc2ppv新着 ‘고코 ごこう, 五光’ 오광 ‘시코 しこう, 四光’ 4광 ‘아메시코 あめしこう, 雨四光’ 비가 끼어있는 사광 ‘산코 さんこう, 三光’ 삼광 ‘이노시카쵸 いのしかちょう, 猪鹿蝶’ 7월의 멧돼지와 10월의 사슴, 그리고 6월의 나비를 모두 모았을 때. 의료관광알다시피 미국은 보험 없으면 죽어야지 수준의 살인적인 의료비로 유명한데멕시코도 나름 교육수준이 높고 의료. 2 우롱@요루토리 @oolong_trpg 어제의 살인귀 유키사쿠 유사쿠 살기 풍기고 있음 아메시코 토모에잘하자 선배. Kr › wiki › 화투화투 – 백괴사전, 너희 모두의 백과사전. 막짤의 티후아나만 해도 샌디에이고 에서 국경만 넘어가면 바로.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.