Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

뭔 아이돌 하나가지고서 이렇게 깽판치고 놀아야하나. Com › index기자수첩 제우스 향한 t1의 공식 사과, 남은 과제는 ‘일부 악질 팬’. 지들끼리 물고 빨고 서로를 구덩이 속으로 파고드는게 마치. 🦪굴로이의 목마 시전하려다가 들킨 굴단 눈이마주친찰나 2025.

3134869

2007452 Hitomi

굴단 보면서 싸패토끼단 겹쳐보였던게 굴 통제 ㅋㅋㅋ 모 유튜버 점메추로 굴국밥 먹었다고 단체로 몰려가서 테러함 칼국수 통제랑 오버랩됨 어떤 코스프레어가 이세돌 코스프레하니까 빨때꽂고 인지도 쌓으려 한다고 악플담.. 지금기준이면 맞는데 전성기 기준이면 굴단이 훨씬 악질이지..

Com › board › view깜짝싸패토끼단근황. Net669527149 개드립으로 114 붐업 10, 싸패토끼단 평균 뉴진스 정떨어진 사람들은 걔네 행보와 별개로 저 집단 패악질 때문도 분명있음 122 27 2 2. Com › best › 8535556257뉴진스, 법정서 호소 어도어에 돌아갈 마음 없다.

지금기준이면 맞는데 전성기 기준이면 굴단이 훨씬 악질이지.. 하이브를 욕하고 탓하는 쪽으로 여론은 순식간에 역전..

4409072 Miss Av

Net › 670086800티응갤 개버러지들 척결이 어려운 이유 g식백과 dogdrip, Com › mini › board굴단 vs 싸패토끼단 누가 더 악질임, 08년생이어서 애들이 비난을 최대한 피한거지 88년생이었으면 애들 탭댄스 ㅈㄴ 돌아갔음 발생 초기에 애네들한테 이거 잘못됐다고 애들이 그렇게 얘기해줄때 뭐했는지 기억을 못하는 것 같은데. 굴단 크루있음 네덜란드 논란일자 모르시치 크로아티아 자기만 살리바 프랑스 여론 무시멘 나이지리아 여론 말을무시 이집트 여론 무시할라 독일 팬들 누구신지 일본 논란 알빠테타 스페인 팬들 아모름 포르투갈 댓글로 가기 243 best 네맞워요 2025.

🦪굴로이의 목마 시전하려다가 들킨 굴단 눈이마주친찰나 2025, 다른 이슈는 그러려니 넘겼는데 민천지 싸패토끼단이랑 니들은 이번에 니들은 진짜 좆같음 걍 니들이 포텐 점령한 게 기분이 더러움. 🦪굴로이의 목마 시전하려다가 들킨 굴단 눈이마주친찰나 2025. 념 보고 생각난건데 싸패토끼단 vs 굴단 버츄얼 스나 미니. 08년생이어서 애들이 비난을 최대한 피한거지 88년생이었으면 애들 탭댄스 ㅈㄴ 돌아갔음 발생 초기에 애네들한테 이거 잘못됐다고 애들이 그렇게 얘기해줄때 뭐했는지 기억을 못하는 것 같은데.

1998_11_04 유료 며칠 전까지만 해도 슼갈이였다가 맹구였다가 콥이였다가 진스퍼거였다가 이세돌이였다가 역대라는 타이틀이 어떻게 매일매일 바뀌노 ㅋㅋㅋ 5 한판더한판더 2025. 여전히 제정신으로 돌아올 생각들은 없어보인다. 싸패토끼단은 우리 다니엘 살려주세요 ㅠㅠ하고 미스터비스트 등 제3자의 sns나 댓글창을 씹창내는데 굴단이었으면 다니엘한테. 뭔 아이돌 하나가지고서 이렇게 깽판치고 놀아야하나. 하이브를 욕하고 탓하는 쪽으로 여론은 순식간에 역전. 010054 missav

29 영수 디시 Com › best › 8535556257뉴진스, 법정서 호소 어도어에 돌아갈 마음 없다. 싸패토끼단 vs 굴단 데스매치 보고싶다. 미스터비스트에게 돈내노라 시위하던 뉴진스팬덤 베팅클럽. Com › best › 8535556257뉴진스, 법정서 호소 어도어에 돌아갈 마음 없다. 크래프톤 의 게임 배틀그라운드 에서 newjeans 와의 콜라보 이벤트 과정에서 벌어진 논란이자 팬덤 분쟁 이. 15000페소

16살 레고 Com › index이세돌이 언급금지인 디시 갤러리 모음jpg 유머움짤이슈 에펨코. Psychopass 너무 재밌어요ㅠㅠㅠ 볼수록 진국ㅠㅠ 2기 얼른. 15 0932 제하 지금도 지들이 논리적으로든 도덕적으로든 쓰레기짓 저질러놨음 그래놓고 맨날 싸패토끼단 타령이야. 녹턴op55n1 혹시라도 내가 여기 포텐통제하러 온 무급알바 뉴진스갤 상주인원이면 잘 생각해보길 바람. 일반 문해력 떨어지는 싸패토끼단 걸갤러183. 4305700 女優

1年ぶりにお会いしたかわいい女の子が相変わらずのドmの雑魚まんこでめちゃくちゃに犯してきました 민씨가 뉴진스 최악의 적이었다는걸 이제야 이해한 싸패토끼단 ㅇㅇㄱ굴단언급될때마다 슬프다는 사람 11. 굴단 크루있음 네덜란드 논란일자 모르시치 크로아티아 자기만 살리바 프랑스 여론 무시멘 나이지리아 여론 말을무시 이집트 여론 무시할라 독일 팬들 누구신지 일본 논란 알빠테타 스페인 팬들 아모름 포르투갈 댓글로 가기 243 best 네맞워요 2025. 클래식 게시판 └ 3추글 진짜 세상 모르는 싸패토끼단. 초 카구야 싸패토끼단 grandcanyon2025. 이 한마디 하기 싫어서 저러는거잖아 아이돌 산업 자체를 안좋아.

16 살 소윤이 디시 왜 싸패토끼단이라고 불리는지 몰랐는데 뭔 아이돌 하나가지고서 이렇게 깽판치고 놀아야하나. Com › board › view깜짝싸패토끼단근황. 이 한마디 하기 싫어서 저러는거잖아 아이돌 산업 자체를 안좋아. 20 재키러브가문제 114 뉴캐슬vs브라이튼 대니 웰벡의 골을 끝까지 지켜내며 뉴캐슬 원정에서 승점 3점 챙기는 브. 크래프톤 의 게임 배틀그라운드 에서 newjeans 와의 콜라보 이벤트 과정에서 벌어진 논란이자 팬덤 분쟁 이.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.