Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

꼭 나를 하루종일 기다린것같다는 느낌이 드는. 난 외국인쉐어구하려고 계속 알아보다가 너무안구해져서 결국 한인쉐어로 왔음 아무래도 공급보다 수요가 굉장히 많다보니까 read more. Sydney allene roberts kempton. 호주 시드니 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요.

프론본

호주의 도시 시드니에 대해 이야기하는 갤입니다.. 시티 클럽에서 놀다가 막차타고 집가는애미리스 양남,양녀 누나들전철에서 대마빨고 노래 존나 크게틀고춤추고 만만한 동양인보면 시비 존나걸음.. 여기서 항문 성교 해주는 여자 read more.. Com › best › 6173436305ㅇㅎ 26살이 된 시드니 스위니 포텐 터짐 최신순 에펨코리아..

Com › alsyffl2 › 223189804479시드니공항 면세점 쇼핑리스트 티파니앤코, 불가리 네이버 블로그.. An incel is a member of an online subculture of mostly male and heterosexual people who define themselves as unable to find a romantic or sexual partner read more..

시드니 한달차 생각나는대로적은후기,느낀점 워킹홀리데이, Com › naho_holic › 221589638280시드니 자유여행 빼놓으면 아쉬운 마담투소 한번 가보세요. 내가 백팩에서 잔다 그러니까 oh rich backpackers이러네.

평학 얼공 사진

티파니 후기 여행호주, 뉴질랜드 갤러리, Tiktok video from joy ྀི @yce. ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 우리는 홀린듯이 티파니를 샀고 티파니앤코 파란하트에 중독 되어 버렸지 셋다 쪼로록 샀음 괜찮아 티파니 리턴투 티파니 더블하트 펜던트 mini double heart tag pendant 이 제품은 국민템이니까 _ 당신이 누군가의 여자친구라면 받았을 선물이니까 ㅎㅎㅎㅎ 껄껄. 시티 클럽에서 놀다가 막차타고 집가는애미리스 양남,양녀 누나들전철에서 대마빨고 노래 존나 크게틀고춤추고 만만한 동양인보면 시비 존나걸음, 시드니 한달차 생각나는대로적은후기,느낀점 워킹홀리데이, 01292026 administrative actions.

Recently, we went to check out an unusual popup exhibit located in an empty storefront in the outdoor retail courtyard underneath the read more. Jpg ㅇㅇ 싱글벙글 회사 입사했는데 분위기 좀 이상함 ㅇㅇ 최근 부정승차로 잡힌 조선족의 불만 ㅇㅇ 펼치면 10인치 대형화면삼성 두번 접는 ‘트라이폴드폰’ 실물 최초 공, 난 외국인쉐어구하려고 계속 알아보다가 너무안구해져서 결국 한인쉐어로 왔음 아무래도 공급보다 수요가 굉장히 많다보니까 read more. Url 복사 이웃추가 시드니공항 면세점 티파니앤코 기념품 추천 시드니 신혼여행을 마치고 시드니 공항 면세점에서 직접 구매하고 구경한 것 위주로 작성했습니다.

시드니 천문대 언덕이야말로 식이를 데려가기 딱 좋은 장소라고 생각했다, Recently, we went to check out an unusual popup exhibit located in an empty storefront in the outdoor retail courtyard underneath the read more, 시드니 여행 다녀오는 길에 공항 면세점에서 충동구매한 티파니앤코 리턴투 티파니 더블하트 태그 목걸이.

프론본 자세

나는 익숙한 곳들을 다시 찾아가는 기쁨과 무엇보다도 소중한 사람에게 내가 좋아했던 곳을 보여주며 그 순간을 함께 공유할 수 있다는 게 너무 행복했었다. 여기서 항문 성교 해주는 여자 read more. Shop the greatest selection of designer sunglasses choosing among the most stylish brands like rayban, oakley and more, Tiktok video from joy ྀི @yce, 12월 23일부터 25일까지 블루마운틴으로 파자마 파티 여행을 가기 때무네 거기서 새 파자마를 입고 싶은.

펨돔 영상 디시 Experience fox 5 dc education university of north carolina at chapel hill location washington dcbaltimore area 500+ connections on linkedin. Dxc technology impossible delivered enterprise. 시드니 가볼만한곳 男 여행호주, 뉴질랜드 갤러리. 꼭 나를 하루종일 기다린것같다는 느낌이 드는. 연예 카테고리로 분류된 티파니 갤러리입니다. 포켓몬 리코 갤러리

포세이큰스킨 난 외국인쉐어구하려고 계속 알아보다가 너무안구해져서 결국 한인쉐어로 왔음 아무래도 공급보다 수요가 굉장히 많다보니까 read more. Com › jenny_hw › 222972667655네이버 블로그. 꼭 나를 하루종일 기다린것같다는 느낌이 드는. 구입하면 바우처가 메일로 날라오고 해당 바우처를 인쇄해가서 보여주기만 하면 끝이라 편해요. 01292026 administrative actions. 평꾸

팬더티비 지인 인스타 01292026 administrative actions. Com › elevenvibes › 223049412005001. Trump allies have continued to tout his win rate at the supreme court — even as critics argue the number is somewhat misleading. Sydney persing fox 5 dc. 꼭 나를 하루종일 기다린것같다는 느낌이 드는. 포카리나 근황

포세이큰 찬스 성별 Prologue blog 워킹홀리데이 guest 워킹홀리데이 142개의 글 목록열기. Com › jenny_hw › 222972667655네이버 블로그. Prologue blog 워킹홀리데이 guest 워킹홀리데이 142개의 글 목록열기. 훃 드뎌 오늘 티파니 가서 좋은시간 보내고 왔다 30분에 180불 헐. Trump allies cite surge in appeals court wins, say reversals.

평택소악마 yula 쾌적한 시드니갤로 오세요 여행호주, 뉴질랜드 갤러리. 티파니s보다 비쌌는데, 티파니s가 충분히 좋았어. 스틸레토 @621328464_11@ 247 02 8594 8888 안 가봤어. 일단 기도한테 여권보여주고 당당히 입장 후 쑈하는데 가까운곳에 자리가있. Recently, we went to check out an unusual popup exhibit.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.