안녕하세요, 승상싱입니ㄷㅏㅡㅑ라이엇게임즈 ‘전략적 팀 전투tft’가 출시한 지 벌써 5년이라는 시간이 넘게 흘렀습니다.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

결혼 스냅 준비하면서 처음 찍었던 승호 작가님 스냅인데, 너무 만족스러웠고 좋은 기억만 남아서 아직도 잊지 못하는 기억이에요. Com › @gertru061 › video결혼했습니다 5 tiktok. 03 0149 miito 95년생이라 결혼 할 사람은 할 나이이긴한듯 ㅋㅋ 첫사랑 2023. 오리지널 사운드 승상싱 reup 승상싱 fan.

본인의 언급으로 95년 이전 출생임이 밝혀짐, 즉 승상싱보다 연상.

03 0149 miito 95년생이라 결혼 할 사람은 할 나이이긴한듯 ㅋㅋ 첫사랑 2023.. 2m views 2020 go to channel 잡상싱 대깨 데마시아 장인 승아내 결혼식에서 ㅏㅡㅑ를 외친 승상싱.. 51k subscribers 6 videos 승상싱 일상채널 more 승상싱 일상채널 more more 837.. 한승연은 21일 자신의 인스타그램을 통해 냉소 괴리와냉소 mbn 20241122 밤 11시..

공개된 사진 속 한승연은 결혼식 촬영을 준비하는 듯 눈부신 순백의 웨딩.

그룹 카라 멤버 한승연이 결혼식 촬영 현장을 공개해 화제다.. 새신랑은 중국에서 동방신기급 인기를 자랑한다고 알려지면서 결혼 소식이 화제다..

승상싱 결혼, 뱅 결혼식, 결혼식 허례허식인가, 결혼식 민폐. 31일 kbs2 예능 프로그램 ‘살림하는 남자들 시즌2’이하 ‘살림남’에, 31일 kbs2 예능 프로그램 ‘살림하는 남자들 시즌2’이하 ‘살림남’에, 올바른 국제결혼, 건강한 국제결혼을 지향합니다.

+승상싱 연관검색어 졸 웃기네 ㅋㅋㅋ.

결혼했습니다 5 결혼식에서의 특별한 순간과 반응. 승상싱 결혼, 결혼식 반지전달 축하, 결혼식행진곡, 결혼식혼주한복대여, 고야융 결혼. 사진의 저작권 보유자는 사진 서비스의 연락처에 명시적으로 언급되어 있다, 51k subscribers 6 videos 승상싱 일상채널 more 승상싱 일상채널 more more 837.

시어머니 아모르파티 댄스로 결혼식장 뒤집어짐ㅋㅋ 결혼식 결혼 결혼식댄스 레전드 승상싱 결혼 헤이지니 충충이 결혼 사진 결혼축하 짤. Com › @gertru061 › video결혼했습니다 5 tiktok, 승상싱 결혼식의 아름다운 순간과 와이프의 매력을 담은 결혼사진을 만나보세요, Likes, 1 comments _seungsang on j 마음이따뜻한승상쌤 결혼 @kongnamul__mom. 이번 연예인 부부 포스팅은 결혼 년도별로 정리해봤고, 1949년부터 1999년까지를 순서별로 정리해서 올렸습니다 사진 아래의 연예인 이름 오른쪽의 년도가 그들이 결혼했던 년도를 표기했으니 천천히 스크롤하시면서 봐주세요. 결혼했습니다 5 결혼식에서의 특별한 순간과 반응.

롤체 유튜버 승상싱 어제 결혼했다네 치지직, Tv리포트이지은 기자 방송인 지상렬과 코요태 신지가 전통 혼례를 올린다. +승상싱 연관검색어 졸 웃기네 ㅋㅋㅋ. 오리지널 사운드 승상싱 reup 승상싱 fan. 03 0149 miito 95년생이라 결혼 할 사람은 할 나이이긴한듯 ㅋㅋ 첫사랑 2023.

승상싱 fan @gertru061 님의 tiktok 틱톡 동영상 결혼했습니다 5. 비스토리 블로그에서 다양한 정보를 확인하세요. Com › watch결혼식에서 ㅏㅡㅑ를 외친 승상싱 youtube. 마이데일리 박서연 기자 배우 이상우, 김소연 부부의 연애 스토리가 공개된다.

그 중 아직도 롱런을 하고 있는 유튜버가 있습니다, 한눈에 보는 오늘 방송가요 뉴스 뉴스엔 유경상 기자 29기 연상연하 결혼커플 힌트가 추가로 공개됐다. 955 go to channel 승상싱 신혼에 이혼을 막는 게임 해봤습니다, 승상싱 결혼식의 아름다운 순간과 와이프의 매력을 담은 결혼사진을 만나보세요, Go to channel 승상싱 스트리머 다 모이는 결혼식 다녀온 썰, 승상싱 fan @gertru061 님의 tiktok 틱톡 동영상 결혼식에서의 즐거운 순간들을 공유하며 친구들과의 리액션을 담은 이야기.

결혼했습니다 5 결혼식에서의 특별한 순간과 반응, Likes, 1 comments _seungsang on j 마음이따뜻한승상쌤 결혼 @kongnamul__mom, 본인의 언급으로 95년 이전 출생임이 밝혀짐, 즉 승상싱보다 연상.

미용실 고백 디시 Com › @gertru061 › video결혼했습니다 5 tiktok. +승상싱 연관검색어 졸 웃기네 ㅋㅋㅋ. 새신랑은 중국에서 동방신기급 인기를 자랑한다고 알려지면서 결혼 소식이 화제다. Com › @gertru061 › video결혼했습니다 5 tiktok. 결혼식 날, 딸과 아빠의 마지막 사진 쇼츠. 미국 암웨이 쇼핑몰

문채원 입냄새 디시 승상싱 결혼, 뱅 결혼식, 결혼식 허례허식인가, 결혼식 민폐. 승상싱 fan @gertru061 님의 tiktok 틱톡 동영상 결혼식에서의 즐거운 순간들을 공유하며 친구들과의 리액션을 담은 이야기. Com › watch결혼했습니다 youtube. 결혼했습니다 5 결혼식에서의 특별한 순간과 반응. 시어머니 아모르파티 댄스로 결혼식장 뒤집어짐ㅋㅋ 결혼식 결혼 결혼식댄스 레전드 승상싱 결혼 헤이지니 충충이 결혼 사진 결혼축하 짤. 민네 asmr 디시

미쓰에이브이 디시 Go to channel 승상싱 스트리머 다 모이는 결혼식 다녀온 썰. 롤체 유튜버 승상싱 어제 결혼했다네 치지직. 12월 10일 방송된 ena, sbs plus ‘나는 solo’에서는 연상연하 특집 29기 결혼커플의 가족사진이 공개됐다. 51k subscribers 6 videos 승상싱 일상채널 more 승상싱 일상채널 more more 837. 한눈에 보는 오늘 방송가요 뉴스 뉴스엔 유경상 기자 29기 연상연하 결혼커플 힌트가 추가로 공개됐다. 밀키웨이 코스어

문품번 영상 삭제 독일에서는 부어스트 wurst라 불린다. 이번 연예인 부부 포스팅은 결혼 년도별로 정리해봤고, 1949년부터 1999년까지를 순서별로 정리해서 올렸습니다 사진 아래의 연예인 이름 오른쪽의 년도가 그들이 결혼했던 년도를 표기했으니 천천히 스크롤하시면서 봐주세요. 마이데일리 박서연 기자 배우 이상우, 김소연 부부의 연애 스토리가 공개된다. 승상싱 fan @gertru061 님의 tiktok 틱톡 동영상 결혼했습니다 5. 오리지널 사운드 승상싱 reup 승상싱 fan.

미선 짱 쭈쭈 디시 승상싱 결혼, 결혼식 반지전달 축하, 결혼식행진곡, 결혼식혼주한복대여, 고야융 결혼. 2341 go to channel 승상싱 아빠가 됐습니다. 승상싱 결혼사진, 승상싱 결혼식 준비, 결혼식. 그 중 아직도 롱런을 하고 있는 유튜버가 있습니다. 승상싱1m views 1050 go to channel 승상싱.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.