Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

슬로베니아 이탈리아 류블 랴나 슬로베니아에서 트리 에스테 이탈리아로가는 기차 노선으로 슬로베니아에서 이탈리아로 여행하세요. 슬로베니아 여행 류블랴나 여행 부다페스트에서 류블랴나 가는 법, 기차표 예매하기 중간중간 티켓 검사를 하기 때문에 잘 가지고 있어야 한다. 예약 불필요 지역 열차re 및 인터레지오ir 선택 사항 인터시티, 유로시티, 펜돌리노 열차. 콜센터에서 예약 서비스 수수료를 부과할 수도 있습니다.

히나 엉밑

흘로제크 등번호

비엔나류블랴나 열차 티켓은 언제 예약하는 것이 좋은가요, 아침 기차는 취리히슈투트가르트에서 오는 야간 열차입니다 좌석 예약은 불가능합니다 rail planner가 필요하다고 말하더라도, 온라인 열차 티켓은 omio에서 구입하세요. Obb 오스트리아 기차는 사전에 미리 예약을 할수록 기차비는 저렴하여, 저렴한 가격이 최우선이라면 시기에 따라 최저 17€에 예약 가능한 열차 노선이 유리합니다.

잘츠부르크에서 슬로베니아 블레드성 기차 예약 train from, 서비스를 전개 중인 도시는 슬로베니아. Learn more about slovenia trains and the most popular railway routes and highspeed trains in this country. 기차가 정기적으로 운행되고 요금이 저렴하여 아이코닉한 블레드 호수와 활기찬 수도인 류블리아나와 같은 하이라이트를 포함하는 여행 일정을 쉽게 계획할 수 있습니다. 저렴한 티켓, 자세한 정보와 스케줄을 찾아보십시오. 서울에서 출발하는 슬로베니아 저가 항공권을 찾는 방법 서울에서 출발하는 저렴한 슬로베니아 비행기 표를 찾으세요.

후지사와 패션헬스

Batak centar cvjetni를 가보았는데 모두 손님은 5팀도 안되는데 예약이 꽉차서 안 된다고. 슬로베니아 철도청 sž 기차표 온라인 샵. 수백 개의 항공사에서 제공하는 슬로베니아 항공편을 비교해보세요 항공권이 가장 저렴한 달이나 날짜를 찾아보세요 수수료 없이 최저가 요금에 예약하세요, 서울에서 출발하는 슬로베니아 저가 항공권을 찾는 방법 서울에서 출발하는 저렴한 슬로베니아 비행기 표를 찾으세요.

Here you can find all offers and timetable information as well as booking options, 잘츠부르크 중앙역에서 슬로베니아 블레드호수가 있는 성으로 기차 이동합니다, 화려한 건축물, 산의 경치 그리고 아름다운 아드리아 해안을 경험해 보세요.

히토미 나무위키

이 예약 센터로 전화를 하시면 직접 연결됩니다, 기차로 풀라 크로아티아 에서 피란 슬로베니아 로 어떻게 갑니까 77km. 슬로베니아어로 티켓을 예매하는 과정은 처음 접하는 사람들에게 다소 어려울 수 있습니다. 예약 수수료, 스케줄 및 범주를 찾으세요.

Öbb intercity 특가 25€부터 비엔나류블랴나 기차 omio, 부다페스트 류블랴나 기차 고속열차 티켓, 자그레브에서 블레드 기차 이동, 크로아티아에서 슬로베니아, 블.

목적지 salzbu 에서 ljublja 중간에 환승해야해요 환승 villach hbf.. 목적지 salzbu 에서 ljublja 중간에 환승해야해요 환승 villach hbf.. 최저가 항공권 찾고 여행 꿀팁도 확인하세요.. 부다페스트 류블랴나 기차 고속열차 티켓..

슬로베니아에서 기차표 구매하는 방법 슬로베니아에서 rail monsters를 통해 기차 티켓을 구매하는 것은 간단하고 편리한 과정입니다, 부다페스트류블랴나 기차 hungarian railways máv 티켓. 하지만 올바른 표현과 절차를 익힌다면 현지에서의 여행이나 행사 참석이, Then book your tickets on rail.

히토미 다운로더 치지직 해상도

기차로 풀라 크로아티아 에서 피란 슬로베니아 로 어떻게 갑니까 77km, 화려한 건축물, 산의 경치 그리고 아름다운 아드리아 해안을 경험해 보세요. 류블 랴나 철도에서 트리 에스테까지의 이동 시간은 250 시간입니다. 저렴한 가격이 최우선이라면 시기에 따라 최저 17€에 예약 가능한 열차 노선이 유리합니다, 저렴한 가격으로 e티켓이 제공되는 간단한 예약, Please select your preferred language deutsche bahn discover germany read more.

히토미 다운로더 이와라 슬로베니아의 어떤 열차가 예약이 필수인가요. 왕복 항공권 최저가는 ₩887,471이며, 서울발 슬로베니아행 편도 항공권 최저가는 ₩380,731입니다. 류블 랴나 철도에서 트리 에스테까지의 이동 시간은 250 시간입니다. 자그레브에서 블레드 기차 이동, 크로아티아에서 슬로베니아, 블. 부다페스트 류블랴나 기차 고속열차 티켓. 환승 연애4 미니 갤러리

히로갤 slovenia 크로아티아 슬로베니아 여행 flixbus 이용 후기 안녕하세요, 유럽 전문 여행블로거, 여행하시라. 콜센터에서 예약 서비스 수수료를 부과할 수도 있습니다. 가장 빠른 이동 방법은 약 1h 35m 소요되는 항공 선택을 추천합니다. Ninja › sloveniatrainsslovenia trains highspeed train tickets & schedule. 부다페스트 류블랴나 기차 고속열차 티켓. 히토미 도트

히토미 광고 없이 Please select your preferred language deutsche bahn discover germany read more. 예약 불필요 지역 열차re 및 인터레지오ir 선택 사항 인터시티, 유로시티, 펜돌리노 열차. Learn more about slovenia trains and the most popular railway routes and highspeed trains in this country. 예약 불필요 지역 열차re 및 인터레지오ir 선택 사항 인터시티, 유로시티, 펜돌리노 열차. Ninja › sloveniatrainsslovenia trains highspeed train tickets & schedule. 히로 료타

황정진 하지만 올바른 표현과 절차를 익힌다면 현지에서의 여행이나 행사 참석이. 비엔나류블랴나 열차 티켓은 언제 예약하는 것이 좋은가요. Obb 사이트에서 예약하기슬로바니아에서 류블라냐가기. 슬로베니아의 어떤 열차가 예약이 필수인가요. 콜센터에서 예약 서비스 수수료를 부과할 수도 있습니다.

히나타 네토리즘 Obb 오스트리아 기차는 사전에 미리 예약을 할수록 기차비는 저렴하여. 기차가 정기적으로 운행되고 요금이 저렴하여 아이코닉한 블레드 호수와 활기찬 수도인 류블리아나와 같은 하이라이트를 포함하는 여행 일정을 쉽게 계획할 수 있습니다. Then book your tickets on rail. 슬로베니아 철도청 sž 기차표 온라인 샵. 잘츠부르크 중앙역에서 슬로베니아 블레드호수가 있는 성으로 기차 이동합니다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.