Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

이곳에서는 오후 23시 사이 향수 코너에서 데이트 상대를 찾는 것으로 알려졌다. 러시아녀 스페인으로 혼자 여행감 유명한 성당 들어가서 구경하는데 누가 계속 쳐다보는 느낌듬 주위 둘러보니 어떤 여자가 큰 카메라 목에 걸고 나. Com › 6861032009스페인 살면서 느낀점 일간베스트 일베저장소. Com › articles › 93043643데이트 원하면 파인애플 들어요&mldr.

Furry Hitomi日本

아무래도 한국에 스페인 여자에 대한 사진이나 정보가 빈약하다보니거기에 도움이 되고자 이 글을 올립니다.. 3일현지시각 영국 일간 텔레그래프, 스카이.. 최근에 미프 통해서 여러 스페인 여자랑 연락하고 실제 만나서 느낀점 공유함.. 물론 내가 만난 여자들이 그런애들이었겠지만 얘네들의 습성이 남친이있어도 마음만 맞으면 춤 정도야 하는 마인드..

Gabee Tits

Hanbi0589

3일 현지시각 영국 텔레그래프, 더타임스 등에 따르면, ‘새로운 만남’과는 거리가 멀어보이는 스페인의 대형마트 체인점인 ‘메르카도나’는.. 작년에 겨울방학때 일본오사카 혼자 갔다왔다 나름 꾸며입고 감 새로산 노스페이스패딩입고 리바이스바지입고 세이코알바시계차고 폴로셔츠입음 내 키가 175인데 키높이 신발에 10cm깔창꼇고 일본애들 키 ㅈㄴ작아서 약간 우월하다는느낌도 좀 받았다..

Gsus Hitomi

세비야는 마드리드 바르셀로나를 잇는 3번째 대도시로 태국으로 치면 치앙마이, 폴란드로 치면. 3일 현지시간 영국 일간 텔레그래프 등에 따르면 최근 스페인에선 대형마트에서 데이트 상대를 찾는 여성과 남성이 늘고 있습니다. 스페인 여자가 전부 싸구려가 아니라는 점을 알아주셨으면 합니다, Com › board › view요즘 스페인에서 유행하는 데이트 방법 ㅋㅋ 실시간 베스트 갤러리.

Grok 갤러리

카지노썰 포고인들 반응 뜨거워서 얼른 스페인 여자 썰 올려본다. 8 20240531 164710 211. 스페인에서 뜻밖의 장소가 데이트 상대를 찾는 싱글들 사이에서 인기를 끄는 ‘헌팅 성지’로 떠오르고 있다, 러시아녀 스페인으로 혼자 여행감 유명한 성당 들어가서 구경하는데 누가 계속 쳐다보는 느낌듬 주위 둘러보니 어떤 여자가 큰 카메라 목에 걸고 나.

hakata outcall escort 스페인여자 진심 좋음내 패친도 독일에서 만난 스페니쉬키도 존나 큰데다 말투도 직설적이라. 165 넘는 여자들 절반은 되고, 170 중반 180 이상인 여자들도 심심찮게 보임. 물론 내가 만난 여자들이 그런애들이었겠지만 얘네들의 습성이 남친이있어도 마음만 맞으면 춤 정도야 하는 마인드. Bxxch club ibiza camí 1002, 16, 07800 ibiza, balearic islands, 스페인 이 블로그의 체크인 이 장소의 다른 글 한시에 체크인 한대서 부랴부랴 갔더니. 3일 현지시간 영국 일간 텔레그래프 등에 따르면 최근 스페인에선 대형마트에서 데이트 상대를 찾는 여성과 남성이 늘고 있습니다. fem_b11 sex

hearheart 섹스 165 넘는 여자들 절반은 되고, 170 중반 180 이상인 여자들도 심심찮게 보임. 물론 그렇다고 해서 대체재를 무조건 한남으로 찾는다. 러시아녀 스페인으로 혼자 여행감 유명한 성당 들어가서 구경하는데 누가 계속 쳐다보는 느낌듬 주위 둘러보니 어떤 여자가 큰 카메라 목에 걸고 나. 먼저스페인여자 탐방기를 소개하기전에몇가지 드릴 말씀이 있습니다. 암네시아 클럽 후기를 아주 솔직하게 적어봤습니다. gang_ssl8

gvh805 Bxxch club ibiza camí 1002, 16, 07800 ibiza, balearic islands, 스페인 이 블로그의 체크인 이 장소의 다른 글 한시에 체크인 한대서 부랴부랴 갔더니. 가비 마르코스 요렌테알바로 모라타 마우스 커서를 올리면 이미지 순서를 onoff 할 수 있습니다. 오늘도 엿 같은 인생을 사는 개막장이야. 상점문 앞에서 점원이 나와서 하몽 자른 조각을 쟁반에 담아서 시식을 하게 해주거든요. 시리즈 헬구리 썰툰 시리즈 함자 썰만화 중동에 스쿼트 전파한 썰1 함자 썰만화 중동에 스쿼트 전파한 썰2 함자 썰만화 중동에 스쿼트 전파한 썰3 함자 썰만화 무슬림 아니어서. h82625h

fc2ppv4784248 스페인 젊은이들 사이에서 대형마트가 헌팅 장소로 인기를 끌고 있습니다. 폴란드에 있다가 스페인 세비야로 넘어갔었음 당연히 세비야행 뱅기표가 제일 쌌거든 10월이였는데 폴란드는 4도였고 세비야는 ㅅㅂ 30도 넘어갔음 몸 고장나는거 아닌가 겁났었노 ㅋㅋ 여튼 도착해서 공항에서 담배 빨고 택시타고 숙소 ㄱㄱ함. 이곳에서는 오후 23시 사이 향수 코너에서 데이트 상대를 찾는 것으로 알려졌다. 가비 마르코스 요렌테알바로 모라타 마우스 커서를 올리면 이미지 순서를 onoff 할 수 있습니다. 작년에 겨울방학때 일본오사카 혼자 갔다왔다 나름 꾸며입고 감 새로산 노스페이스패딩입고 리바이스바지입고 세이코알바시계차고 폴로셔츠입음 내 키가 175인데 키높이 신발에 10cm깔창꼇고 일본애들 키 ㅈㄴ작아서 약간 우월하다는느낌도 좀 받았다.

fuko rule34 스페인여자 탐방기2유럽여자애들 전번따기 팁포함. Com › view › nisx20240904_0002874422파인애플은 사귀자 신호. 이런 유행은 스페인 유명 백화점 엘코르테 잉글레스로까지 확산했다. 오늘도 엿 같은 인생을 사는 개막장이야. Com › articles › 93043643데이트 원하면 파인애플 들어요&mldr.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.