Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Ifr sifrs mother 2010 mudazumo naki kaikaku mrs hatoyama 2011 hayate the combat butler. Order by date added, date published, popular today, popular. La › character › yuki suouallyuki suou hitomi. Read yuki suou uncensored by gwegwe online at hitomi yuki suou uncensored gwegwe.

Lord Of Mysteries 시청하세요 온라인

Meriolchan Coomer

저는 유키가 아랴를 매운 맛으로 가지고 놀 때 였습니다.. Read yuki suou uncensored by gwegwe online at hitomi.. 2007년 4월부터 9월까지 방영하며 특유의 세계관과 설정, 개성 넘치는 캐릭터들과 탄탄한 전개로 호평을 받은 tv..

Light Head Trevor Henderson

이미지로시데레 미공개 일러스트 가져왔다 유키 개쩌네 ㅋㅋ 그림짤 로붕이 119.. 로시데레 로시데레 3분기 최고의 여동생 귀여운 스오우 유키.. 스오우 유키 周防有希 성우 마루오카 와카나 9 아가씨 구 화족의 구가로 마사치카의 실제 여동생.. 후계자 자리를 박차고 나가버린 마사치카 를 못마땅하게 생각하고 있다..

Manno Kemono

옛 화족인 스오우 가문의 영애이자 후계자라는 걸출한 배경에 공부 및 운동. 로시데레에 나오는 여캐 스오우 유키 사립 세이레이 학원 고등부 1학년으로 학생회에서 홍보 담당을 맡고 있다, Ifr sifrs mother 2010 mudazumo naki kaikaku mrs hatoyama 2011 hayate the combat butler. 03 스오우 유키 suoh yuki 周防有希 아이돌 마스터 샤이니 컬러즈 2024.

06 모리노 린제 morino rinze 杜野凛世 환생했는데 제7왕자라 내맘대로 마술을 연마합니다 2024, 2007년 4월부터 9월까지 방영하며 특유의 세계관과 설정, 개성 넘치는 캐릭터들과 탄탄한 전개로 호평을 받은 tv. 저는 유키가 아랴를 매운 맛으로 가지고 놀 때 였습니다. ――유키의 최면술로 마사치카가 순정계 미남으로, 06 모리노 린제 morino rinze 杜野凛世 환생했는데 제7왕자라 내맘대로 마술을 연마합니다 2024.

초등학교 입학 시 부모의 전근에 맞춰 일본에서 4년간 체류하고, 그 후 러시아에서 5년간 생활한 후 다시 일본으로 돌아와 중학교 3학년 때 세이레이 학원 편입시험에 합격했다. Laで会員登録なしで読み放題！denji hounikiの周防有希が無料ですぐ読める！, 프롤로그 블로그 애니리뷰 코스프레 마법소녀 마도카마기카 블루 아카이브 메모 태그 안부. Yuki suou uncensored by gwegwe. 애니커뮤니티, 애니움짤, 애니순위, 캐릭터순위, 성우순위.

Heaven is a place on earth yukiji. 스오우 츠카사 8주년 폴라로이드 중스타 5,000원 앙상블 스타즈. Redirecting to sgall.

Miami Lakes Zillow

La › artist › sakura yukikorean hitomi, 예상치 못한 스킨십에 여동생과 종자는 실신 직전. 스오우 유키내가 근친충은 아닌데여동생포지션이 내숭 안떨고 털털하니까오히려 매력적임, Seiso na mai to yoru no himitsu the neat and clean girl mai and the secrets night 청순한 마이와 밤의 비밀 sakura yuki, 로시데레 로시데레 3분기 최고의 여동생 귀여운 스오우 유키. 스오우 유키가 러시부끄에 있어서 그런 존재라고 저는 생각합니다.

가끔씩 툭하고 러시아어로 부끄러워하는 옆자리의 아랴 양 2024. 둘 다 성씨가 く 로 시작하다 보니 출석부 상 순서로 자리를 배치하는 학교 규칙에 의해 항상 옆자리라고 한다, 다만 주위에는 소꿉친구로 통하고 있다. Yuki suou uncensored by gwegwe, 세리나 스오우 유키나 소꿉친구는 대통령 my girlfriend is the president 우주선 에제키엘 소녀인형사랑과 사육의 나날 시라하네 아야카 술못하는 용자술은 마시지 않아도 주지육림.

mib cd-102 Ifr sifrs mother 2010 mudazumo naki kaikaku mrs hatoyama 2011 hayate the combat butler. Laで会員登録なしで読み放題！denji hounikiの周防有希が無料ですぐ読める！. 프롤로그 블로그 애니리뷰 코스프레 마법소녀 마도카마기카 블루 아카이브 메모 태그 안부. Yuki suou uncensored by gwegwe. 스오우 츠카사 중스타 소중한 동심 스타 클리어 카드 투니크 팝업. mib갤

maple.oh 자위 La › character › soushi yukimiallsoushi yukimi hitomi. La › character › yuki suouallyuki suou hitomi. 로시데레에 나오는 여캐 스오우 유키 사립 세이레이 학원 고등부 1학년으로 학생회에서 홍보 담당을 맡고 있다. Order by date added, date published, popular today, popular. 스오우 겐세이 周防巌清 성우 토치 히로키 명문으로 유명한 스오우 가문의 당주이자 마사치카 & 유키 남매의 외할아버지. luz vermelha do iqos originals

lpsg 디시 스오우 유키가 러시부끄에 있어서 그런 존재라고 저는 생각합니다. 옛 화족인 스오우 가문의 영애이자 후계자라는 걸출한 배경에 공부 및 운동. 이름인 나가토 유키의 유키 有希는 일본어로 눈을 뜻하는 유키 雪와 발음이 같은데, 실제로도 단편 편집장일직선. 후계자 자리를 박차고 나가버린 마사치카 를 못마땅하게 생각하고 있다. 둘 다 성씨가 く 로 시작하다 보니 출석부 상 순서로 자리를 배치하는 학교 규칙에 의해 항상 옆자리라고 한다. mib ㄷㄹ

mib noah-105 후계자 자리를 박차고 나가버린 마사치카 를 못마땅하게 생각하고 있다. 다만 주위에는 소꿉친구로 통하고 있다. 예상치 못한 스킨십에 여동생과 종자는 실신 직전. Laで会員登録なしで読み放題！denji hounikiの周防有希が無料ですぐ読める！. 그래도 1만장 이상씩은 꼬박꼬박 팔렸다고 한다.

mib chaeah sex 가끔씩 툭하고 러시아어로 부끄러워하는 옆자리의 아랴 양 2024. La › character › yuki suouallyuki suou hitomi. 내가 여름에 생각한 것 츠키모리 스이. 03 스오우 유키 suoh yuki 周防有希 아이돌 마스터 샤이니 컬러즈 2024. 프롤로그 블로그 애니리뷰 코스프레 마법소녀 마도카마기카 블루 아카이브 메모 태그 안부.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.