Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

오늘 휴방 8,9일 중 하루 킨데영트위치 막방으로. 10 1214 조회수 17457 추천 121 댓글 52 비방댓글 많이 달렸나봐 추천검색 새로고침 개념글 추천하기 121고정닉 추천수31 비추천하기 5 공유 신고. 07 0641 족마신 그래도 건강 생각을 하네 ㅋㅋ. 요즘에는 안보지만 새벽에 데바데켜두고 자는게 일상이였는데수탉님 데바데 bj합방도 기대할수있는건가.

수수깡 형님

Com › 63505468803명오셈 원신 에펨코리아.. 아직 포텐 안밧다 이제 결과 봤으니 포텐에서 죄인 두명 대차게 까이는거 보면됨 ㅋ..

소추 안과교수님과

수탉 기사읽다가 타고들가게됐는데 진짜 갤아니랄까봐 게시판에 지 구질구질함 전시하고앉았네, 07 0646 오 짬타수아님도 아프리카 확정이야. 펨코연령대가특히 원갤연령대도 은근 높다는것을 감안하면 정상이다 ㅇㅇ. 같은 본문의 단어를 영어성경 rsv, niv는 활보하는 수탉이라고 했다.

순애보 디시

진짜 나오면 누구랑 할지뭐 할지 궁금하긴하다흥민이도 같이하면 좋을텐데.. 매주 수요일 밤 10시 아빠하고 나하고 본방 사수, 연하남은 ㄹㅇ 감당이 안됨 역학 갤러리, 역학갤 미친년아 수탉유.. 공포게임 전문 유튜버 수탉 수탉인터넷 방송인 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요.. 원래 여자 반정도에 구독 챗 가득한 잔잔방이였는데 ㅅㅂㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ..

ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 뭔가 그림이 읏길듯 2024. 라면 드시는거 왤케 맛있어 보이지 하늘색하나에 21, 타요,강만식이 2명은 중간다리로 꼭 걸쳐있네 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ생각해보면 이 둘이 이적생들 잘 챙겨주긴 하더라 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ, 숲 관련갤에서도 우정잉 아예 무관심인게 공포지 숲 이적생 미니. 여윽시 수탉갤 14 juvenile 2023. 연하남은 ㄹㅇ 감당이 안됨 역학 갤러리.

03 1014 심연에 납치당하는 푸리나, 같은 본문의 단어를 영어성경 rsv, niv는 활보하는 수탉이라고 했다, 재미 보장에종겜에 누구보다 진지하고아직 몸 안 좋나. 오늘 휴방 8,9일 중 하루 킨데영트위치 막방으로.

게임 던전앤파이터 리그 오브 레전드 메이플스토리 아이돌마스터 fc 온라인 마비노기 로스트아크 승리의 여신 니케 사운드 볼텍스 포켓몬스터 연예방송 남자 연예인 방탄소년단 블랙핑크 아이유 윤하 다리미 패밀리 정년이 걸스플래닛999 기타 국내 드라마 기타 미국드라마 스포츠 삼성 라이온즈 kia. 피셜로는 키도 크고존잘이라고 들었는데이제 필드로 나온다고. 07 142 1 잡담 왁굳님 유튜브 요즘 몰아보고 있는데 15 저스틴 2024.

숲 soop 잡담 인기글 목록 2024. 현재 샌드박스 네트워크 소속 크리에이터로, 2013년부터 soop 에서 활동을. 라면 드시는거 왤케 맛있어 보이지 하늘색하나에 21. 07 0639 뭐야 르르땅 닉 언제 받았어, 15 자유 ㅇㅇㅅ 곧 알등이 하나 굴러올듯 2 카미사토아야카 2023. 15 자유 ㅇㅇㅅ 곧 알등이 하나 굴러올듯 2 카미사토아야카 2023.

03 1014 심연에 납치당하는 푸리나. 07 0634 수탉 최근에 고정팟들이랑 리썰하면서 느낀듯. 현재 샌드박스 네트워크 소속 크리에이터로, 2013년부터 soop 에서 활동을. 수탉님치지직 만큼은 제발 마이너 갤러리. 10 1214 조회수 17457 추천 121 댓글 52 비방댓글 많이 달렸나봐 추천검색 새로고침 개념글 추천하기 121고정닉 추천수31 비추천하기 5 공유 신고. 유럽 교회의 종탑 꼭대기에 서 있는 수탉은 풍향을 가리키는 동시에 언제나 깨어 있도록, 그리고.

숲 Bj 엘

무너무너 이거웃겨서 유튭 종종봤는데대박이네 2024. 유튭으로만 볼땐 몰랐는데 뭔가 신기하네목소리때문에 단호하고 추진력있으실줄알았는데굉장히 조심스러운 성격이신가, 사실 수탉도 오기만하면 녹황이랑 더불어서 종겜류 투톱에 들어가긴함 점마도 플랫폼만 바꾸면 생방청자 체급 더커질게 뻔한새끼라서. 유튭으로만 볼땐 몰랐는데 뭔가 신기하네목소리때문에 단호하고 추진력있으실줄알았는데굉장히 조심스러운 성격이신가, Net › webchon › board커뮤니티_나눔갤러리, 요즘에는 안보지만 새벽에 데바데켜두고 자는게 일상이였는데수탉님 데바데 bj합방도 기대할수있는건가.

세토 킨나 Net › webchon › board커뮤니티_나눔갤러리. 요즘에는 안보지만 새벽에 데바데켜두고 자는게 일상이였는데수탉님 데바데 bj합방도 기대할수있는건가. 오늘 휴방 8,9일 중 하루 킨데영트위치 막방으로. 왜캐 귀엽냐 ㅋㅋㅋ공지쓰면 재수없어 보인다느니 ㅈㄴ 귀엽네. 요즘에는 안보지만 새벽에 데바데켜두고 자는게 일상이였는데수탉님 데바데 bj합방도 기대할수있는건가. 손흥민 꼬툭튀

수면제 썰 타요,강만식이 2명은 중간다리로 꼭 걸쳐있네 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ생각해보면 이 둘이 이적생들 잘 챙겨주긴 하더라 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ. 10 1214 조회수 17457 추천 121 댓글 52 비방댓글 많이 달렸나봐 추천검색 새로고침 개념글 추천하기 121고정닉 추천수31 비추천하기 5 공유 신고. 같은 본문의 단어를 영어성경 rsv, niv는 활보하는 수탉이라고 했다. 85면거의 3만원인데흐음 혹시 드신분들 후기점. 숲 관련갤에서도 우정잉 아예 무관심인게 공포지 숲 이적생 미니. 섹밍 porn

손담비 정려원 손절 디시 피셜로는 키도 크고존잘이라고 들었는데이제 필드로 나온다고. 공포게임 전문 유튜버 수탉 수탉인터넷 방송인 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요. Com › 6350501235심연에 납치당하는 푸리나 원신 에펨코리아. 07 0634 수탉 최근에 고정팟들이랑 리썰하면서 느낀듯. 03 949 15 자유 ㅇㅇㅅ 곧 알등이 하나 굴러올듯 2 카미사토아야카 2023. 섹트 june

섹트 일본 뭐 수탉님 유튜브 체급있다 하지만 당장 유튜브88만인 지피티도 비제이들이랑 교류 없이 외딴섬일때 10명도 안보던곳이 아프리카임 ㅋㅋㅋ애초에 앞 유동들이 전통적인 스토리충, 도파민충들이 많아서 혼자 잔잔하게 하는 방송으로 수탉님만큼 찍는게 대단함. Net › webchon › board커뮤니티_나눔갤러리. 원래 여자 반정도에 구독 챗 가득한 잔잔방이였는데 ㅅㅂㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ. 15 자유 ㅇㅇㅅ 곧 알등이 하나 굴러올듯 2 카미사토아야카 2023. 여윽시 수탉갤 14 juvenile 2023.

소지섭 눈 디시 07 0646 오 짬타수아님도 아프리카 확정이야. 03 949 15 자유 ㅇㅇㅅ 곧 알등이 하나 굴러올듯 2 카미사토아야카 2023. 타요,강만식이 2명은 중간다리로 꼭 걸쳐있네 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ생각해보면 이 둘이 이적생들 잘 챙겨주긴 하더라 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ. 여윽시 수탉갤 14 juvenile 2023. 뭐 수탉님 유튜브 체급있다 하지만 당장 유튜브88만인 지피티도 비제이들이랑 교류 없이 외딴섬일때 10명도 안보던곳이 아프리카임 ㅋㅋㅋ애초에 앞 유동들이 전통적인 스토리충, 도파민충들이 많아서 혼자 잔잔하게 하는 방송으로 수탉님만큼 찍는게 대단함.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.