솔비는 최근 스포츠신문과 인터뷰에서 자신과 닮은 여성이 등장한 야동 때문에 당시 사귀던 남자친구와 헤어지게 됐다고 밝혔다.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

서울지방경찰청 사이버범죄수사대는 9일 가수 솔비본명 권지안ㆍ27와 닮은 여자가 나오는 음란 동영상을 퍼뜨린 혐의정보통신망 이용촉진 및 정보보호. 솔비는 최근 스포츠신문과 인터뷰에서 자신과 닮은 여성이 등장한 야동 때문에 당시 사귀던 남자친구와 헤어지게 됐다고 밝혔다. 솔비를 닮은 야한 동영상 사건 때문에 당시 사귀던 남자친구와 헤어졌다고 한다. 살 빠진 솔비인 줄 알았어라는 제목으로 아이유와 솔비 사진이 게재됐다.

솔비는 19일 스포츠 조선과의 인터뷰에서 솔비씨와 닮은 여성의 야한 동영상으로 심적 고생이 심했던 걸로 알고 있다는 질문에 당시 남자친구가 있었는데 그 동영상 때문에 헤어졌다고 밝혔다.

Com › News › Articleview솔비, 야동사건 때문에 당시 사귀던 남자친구와 헤어져 사회일반.

솔비는 19일 스포츠 조선과의 인터뷰에서 솔비씨와 닮은 여성의 야한 동영상으로 심적 고생이 심했던 걸로 알고 있다는 기자의 질문에 당시 남자친구가 있었는데 그 동영상 때문에 헤어졌다고 밝혔다.

솔비는 12일 오후 방송된 jtbc 김제동의 톡투유 걱정 말아요 그대. 약간 수치스럽긴 하겠지만, 인간은 생명체고 누구든 세크스는 하잖아, 솔비는 12일 오후 방송된 jtbc 김제동의 톡투유 걱정 말아요 그대. 솔비는 19일 스포츠 조선과의 인터뷰에서 솔비씨와 닮은 여성의 야한 동영상으로 심적 고생이 심했던 걸로 알고 있다는 기자의 질문에 당시 남자친구가 있었는데 그 동영상 때문에 헤어졌다고 밝혔다.

Kr › article › nb10257116솔비 난 세계적인 미녀&mldr, 솔비는 19일 스포츠 조선과의 인터뷰에서 솔비씨와 닮은 여성의 야한 동영상으로 심적 고생이 심했던 걸로 알고 있다는 질문에 당시 남자친구가 있었는데 그 동영상 때문에 헤어졌다고 밝혔다, 서울지방경찰청 사이버범죄수사대는 9일 osen과의 통화에서, Com › view › 20110506n13544솔비, 닮은꼴 언니사진 공개 자매라 닮긴 닮았나 네이트 연예.

ㅎㅎㅎㅎ 귀엽네 거기 남자녀석 성감대가 똥꼬인가. 가수 솔비가 야한 동영상에 출연했다는 루머로 아픔을 겪었다고 고백했다. 솔비 동영상은 가짜재미삼아 인터넷 올려. Com › view › 20110506n13544솔비, 닮은꼴 언니사진 공개 자매라 닮긴 닮았나 네이트 연예.

아이비 솔비 닮은꼴 ⓒ 온라인 커뮤니티 서울뉴스웨이 최가람 기자가수 아이비본명 박은혜와 솔비본명 권지안이 외모 닮은꼴로 화제다. 공개한 사진 속 원자현 솔비는 친분을 과시하듯 얼굴을 가까이 하고 카메라를응시하고 있는 모습으로 닮은 모습이 눈길을 끌고 있다, 근데 위고비 식욕억제해주는거니까 비만이랑 상관 없이 맞아도 상관없는거임, Com › view › 20110506n13544솔비, 닮은꼴 언니사진 공개 자매라 닮긴 닮았나 네이트 연예. 솔비와 비슷한 스타일과 인기 영상들로 가득합니다.

19일 솔비는 모 스포츠신문과의 인터뷰에서 야동 루머로 인해 당시 남자친구와 헤어졌다고 털어놨다.

후카다 에이미 이종석 카케이 준 전태규 유.. 살빠진 솔비인 줄 알았어라는 제목의 글과 사진이 게재됐다.. 솔비는 6일 오후 1시께 자신의 트위터에 이 스마트폰 어디서 연애질이야.. 솔비는 최근 스포츠신문과 인터뷰에서 자신과 닮은 여성이 등장한 야동 때문에 당시 사귀던 남자친구와 헤어지게 됐다고 밝혔다..

Com › best › 1190852064솔비로 잘못 알려진 동영상 사건 jpg 포텐 터짐 최신순 에펨코리, 온라인 커뮤니티 게시판에는 아이비 최근 모습, 나는 솔로 6기, 솔비 닮은꼴부터 서민갑부 출신 솔로남까지. 공개된 사진 속에는 아이비의 최근 모습과 솔비의 모습이 나란히 비교돼 있어 네티즌들의 시선을 사로잡고 있다. 실제로는 가수 솔비와 외모가 비슷한 여성의 음란동영상이었지만, 솔비가, 근데 위고비 식욕억제해주는거니까 비만이랑 상관 없이 맞아도 상관없는거임.

깜뉴스 솔비가 그간 떠돌았던 야한 동영상 루머에 대한 심경을 고백했다. 동영상 시작부분에서는 얼핏 닮기도 했네요, 솔비를 닮은 야한 동영상 사건 때문에 당시 사귀던 남자친구와 헤어졌다고 한다. 솔비와 비슷한 스타일과 인기 영상들로 가득합니다.

11월 공개된 사진 속에는 아이비의 최근 모습과 솔비의 모습이 나란히 비교돼 있어 네티즌들의 시선을 사로잡고 있다. 한눈에 보는 오늘 방송가요 뉴스 머니투데이 스타뉴스 진주 인턴기자 가수 솔비가 닮은꼴 언니 사진을 공개해 눈길을 모았다. Com › view › 20110506n13544솔비, 닮은꼴 언니사진 공개 자매라 닮긴 닮았나 네이트 연예. 동영상 시작부분에서는 얼핏 닮기도 했네요. 실제로는 가수 솔비와 외모가 비슷한 여성의 음란동영상이었지만, 솔비가. 072q 초승달

0507huihui 서울지방경찰청 사이버범죄수사대는 9일 osen과의 통화에서. Kr › news › articleview솔비닮은꼴 목소리까지 똑같네. 솔비 닮은 동영상 파문 사건 네이버 지식in. 그림 그리는 가수 솔비 사실은 진지한 사람 앵커 가수로 데뷔해 화가로도 활동하는 솔비가 개인전을 열었습니다. 제가 알기로는 이 동영상이 원래는 엄청 예전에 있었던걸로 아는대 갑. 12baegirl做爱

19jav 공개한 사진 속 원자현 솔비는 친분을 과시하듯 얼굴을 가까이 하고 카메라를응시하고 있는 모습으로 닮은 모습이 눈길을 끌고 있다. 공개된 사진 속에는 아이비의 최근 모습과 솔비의 모습이 나란히 비교돼 있어 네티즌들의 시선을 사로잡고 있다. 서울지방경찰청 사이버범죄수사대는 9일 가수 솔비본명 권지안ㆍ27와 닮은 여자가 나오는 음란 동영상을 퍼뜨린 혐의정보통신망 이용촉진 및 정보보호. 깜뉴스 솔비가 그간 떠돌았던 야한 동영상 루머에 대해 입을 열었다. 이날 방송에서는 솔비 관련 목격담이 전해졌다. 4360403 fc2

1000페소 한국돈 솔비 닮은 동영상 파문 포털사이트 블로그와 웹하드 등에서 ‘솔비 매니저 유출영상 고화질’이라는 제목의 영상이 유포됐다. 주말이라 잠깐 나왔더니 아는 언니가 솔비 동영상봤냐고 묻더군요 그래서 예전에 솔비닮은여자 그거 솔비아니라고 했더니 그게 아니고 스폰했던 남자가 욱해서 내보냈다고하면서 자기는 어제 신랑이랑 봤다며. 동영상 시작부분에서는 얼핏 닮기도 했네요. 그림 그리는 가수 솔비 사실은 진지한 사람 연합뉴스tv. 솔비는 19일 스포츠 조선과의 인터뷰에서 솔비씨와 닮은 여성의 야한 동영상으로 심적 고생이 심했던 걸로 알고 있다는 기자의 질문에 당시 남자친구가 있었는데 그 동영상 때문에 헤어졌다고 밝혔다.

0262265000 서울경찰청 사이버범죄수사대는 9일 가수 솔비27본명 권지안사진와 닮은 여성이 나오는 음란 동영상을 ‘솔비 매니저 유출 영상’이라며 퍼뜨린 혐의로 김모18군 등 5명을 불구속 입건했다. 솔비 닮은 동영상 파문이 몇일전에 11월 달 경쯤에 일어났잖아요. 살 빠진 솔비인 줄 알았어라는 제목으로 아이유와 솔비 사진이 게재됐다. 9일 방송한 nqq와 sbs plus의 리얼 데이팅 프로그램 ‘나는 solo’에서는 6기 출연자들이 가. Kr › news › articleview솔비닮은꼴 목소리까지 똑같네.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.