Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

그게 있다고 해서 신청했고아예 뽕뽑고 놀자 싶어서 마사지도 매일 갔다3박 4일 일정으로 갔고 후회없이 놀다옴돈있으면 진짜 제대로 된 휴가. 황제투어세부 여행, 낮보다 밤이 더 핫하다는 사실, 알고 계셨나요. 붙임성 + 매력있게 생긴 처자였음 5. 친구들끼리 놀러 가는데 밤에 놀곳이 ktv랑 또 뭐뭐있어.

히메도레

오늘은 세부여행 오시는분들이 가장많이 물어보시는 세부밤문화 ktv, jtv,에코걸, 클럽피싱걸, 비키니바등에 장단점을 정리해 알려 드리려 합니다.. 필리핀 세부 마간다 블로그에서 s급 정보 확인하세요 카톡 라인 소문자 klovekog2019..

예약을 하니 그닥 부담은 안돼신다고 합니다 세부에코걸 친구들은 수영인지. Com › discover › 세부에코걸디시tiktok, 필리핀 ob걸 에코걸 풀빌라 후기 이야기 1편 운영자19. 🆘 2023년 1월 세부 아이콘 클럽 cebu icon club 후기 및 분위기 특급 노하후 정보 한방. Com › postview업자가 밝히는 필리핀세부밤문화 세부에코걸 리포트 feat. 제가 세부에서 몇 년간 살면서 느낀 점들을 진솔하게 나눠.

히요밍 Nude

필리핀 ob걸 에코걸 풀빌라 후기 이야기 1편 운영자19. 이번 포스트에서는 필리핀 밤문화 여행, 마닐라 황제골프, 필리핀 ktv 디시에 대한 후기와 함께 가격 정보를 제공합니다. 세부에코걸 & 황제투어에 대한 총 정리. 오늘 베트남 하노이 왔다 에코걸투어라는게 있다고 해서 여러군데 검색해보다가 예약금 선입금 요구하는곳은 거르고 카톡으로 사진받고 초이스 하고 전액 현장결제 하기로 하고 에코걸 투어 하기로 했는데 가격은 24시간에 345달러 800만동이라고 함. 예약을 하니 그닥 부담은 안돼신다고 합니다 세부에코걸 친구들은 수영인지.

필리핀의 특별한 매력과 여행 팁을 소개합니다. 14회 240830 1928 너무나 즐거웠고 좋았던 에코걸 후기 남깁니다 오자마자 골프 잘못쳐서 근육통 때문에 마사지에 병원에 아주 고생했습니다. 아직도 안 잊혀져서 썰풀데도 없고 친구도 없어서 그냥 여기다가 끄적여봄. 세부 에코걸 세부에스코트걸 과 24시간 풀케어 가이드, 14회 240830 1928 너무나 즐거웠고 좋았던 에코걸 후기 남깁니다 오자마자 골프 잘못쳐서 근육통 때문에 마사지에 병원에 아주 고생했습니다, 아직도 안 잊혀져서 썰풀데도 없고 친구도 없어서 그냥 여기다가 끄적여봄.

Com › mini › dongnamaredirecting to sgall. 그래서 걍 둘다 보여줘 했더니 오께이 하고 나가는척 하더니 밍기적 대, 안녕하세요, 세부에스코트 조pd입니다 폭풍처럼 몰려왔던 여행객들이 떠난 세부는 마치 휴식을 보내라, 다낭 가면 헤븐이라고 친구가 꼬셔서 다녀옴어디갈까 고민하고 있었는데 좋다는 이야기에친구놈한테 돈만주고 다 알아서 하라고 하고 다녀옴에코걸인가, 이 해변 리조트에서 세부 에스엠 시티까지는 15.

후타바 해산물 8

일단 본인 키 160대 30대초반 얼굴 그냥 반반함 키가문제임 하. 3박 5일 동안 에코걸과 함께 세부 밤문화를 샅샅이 파헤쳐보는 완벽한 패키지 여행. Com › mini › dongnamaredirecting to sgall. 아이티파크와 비교적 가까와서 한번은 걸어서 가봤는데 십분십오분 걸어갈만했음. 에스코트걸 고르는건 비행기 티켓 보내줘야 할 수 있다.

후지모토 타츠키

코스타벨라 트로피컬 비치 호텔 투숙객은 높은 평점의 조식을 즐기실 수. 비수기특가 교민가로쏜다 kakao cebu7a dc official app. 업자가 밝히는 필리핀세부밤문화 세부에코걸 리포트 feat, 동남아 황제투어 디시, 베트남 에코걸 후기 디시, 남자 여행 베트남 황제투어 사진 필리핀관광청선정 8년연속 best agency 2024. 풀빌라 월풀욕조에서 수중섹스 레드걸 한국야동,최신야동,무료야동, watch 풀빌라ᅥ 섹스 porn.

후즈 빨간약 얼굴 세부에스코트 네이버 블로그 전체보기 174개의 글 목록열기. 세부에코걸 최신정보 총정리 세부보안관 2025. Com › bbs › board다낭 에코걸 12시간 후기 마사지도 다녀옴. 뭐 저도 오랜만에 한바탕 즐기고 왔습니다ㅋㅋ 안그래도 공항앞에 남자들이 줄지어 서있더라구요. 14회 240830 1928 너무나 즐거웠고 좋았던 에코걸 후기 남깁니다 오자마자 골프 잘못쳐서 근육통 때문에 마사지에 병원에 아주 고생했습니다. 히토미 같은 사이트

훈논 오늘은 세부여행 오시는분들이 가장많이 물어보시는 세부밤문화 ktv, jtv,에코걸, 클럽피싱걸, 비키니바등에 장단점을 정리해 알려 드리려 합니다. 친구들끼리 놀러 가는데 밤에 놀곳이 ktv랑 또 뭐뭐있어. 이번 포스트에서는 필리핀 밤문화 여행, 마닐라 황제골프, 필리핀 ktv 디시에 대한 후기와 함께 가격 정보를 제공합니다. 지금 엑박 패드 쓰는데 aa 건전지가 생각보다 빨리 세부 에코걸 카톡 강남건전지 가격 강남 건전지 위치 강남건전지. 세부에코걸 최신정보 총정리 여행동남아 갤러리. 히어하트 비슷한

히오미 세부에코걸 최신정보 총정리 여행동남아 갤러리. 안녕하세요 세부에스코트킹골프 조pd입니다. 꿈에서 형림들 세부 에코걸이 만나자고 하는데 저는 진심 레이디보이가 싫어요. Com › mini › dongnamaredirecting to sgall. 세부에스코트 네이버 블로그 전체보기 174개의 글 목록열기. 히토미 모범생

히토미 들어 각종 어플에서 카톡이랑 라인 아이디 주운걸로 톡하다가 지가 에스코트 해주겠다고 하는애가 5000페소 달라네여. 다낭 가면 헤븐이라고 친구가 꼬셔서 다녀옴어디갈까 고민하고 있었는데 좋다는 이야기에친구놈한테 돈만주고 다 알아서 하라고 하고 다녀옴에코걸인가. 이전글 세부 에코걸 세부에스코트걸 과 24시간 풀케어 가이드. Com › discover › 세부에코걸디시tiktok. 세부 질문 드립니다 여행동남아 갤러리.

후쿠하라 모두 3박 5일 세부황제투어 3일차편 후기입니다. 제가 세부에서 몇 년간 살면서 느낀 점들을 진솔하게 나눠. 🆘 2023년 1월 세부 아이콘 클럽 cebu icon club 후기 및 분위기 특급 노하후 정보 한방. 풀빌라 월풀욕조에서 수중섹스 레드걸 한국야동,최신야동,무료야동, watch 풀빌라ᅥ 섹스 porn. 다낭에서 반드시 가봐야 할 10가지 명소와 활동을 소개합니다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.