Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

총평 카자마 유미는 일본의 성인 배우로, 그녀의 매력적인 외모와 연기력 덕분에 많은 팬들로부터 사랑받고 있습니다. 1968년생 쇼다 치사토가 베프인 것도 이를 뒷받침하고 있다. 2014년 5월에 sod전속으로 데뷔했다. Com › postcats › 48한글자막 jul671 카자마 유미 yumi kazama, 風間ゆみ 아내.

일본 av 배우 타츠미 유이가 9일 인천공항을 통해 영화 av아이돌제작 영화사 조아의 홍보를 위해 입국했다.. 포르노 배우 유미 snapshot 1 0000..

Pikpak Myfans Tuki

카자마 유미 風間ゆみ yumi kazama 추천 품번 juy756 엄마역할 엄마역할 잘함 ㅋㅋ 몸매는 조금 과함, 13 ㅣ 제작년도 2015 ㅣ 61분 ㅣ 청소년 관람불가 ㅣ 에로틱 ㅣ 일본 카자마 유미는 유명 광고 대행사인 아타카 에이전시의 본부장이다, Com › postcats › 48한글자막 jul671 카자마 유미 yumi kazama, 風間ゆみ 아내. Com › postcats › 19유모토렌트 vema255 야마세 미키「アナタだけ特別ですよ」自. 피부는 검지만 탱탱하고 탄력 있는 가슴이 가장 큰 무기.

주연 배우에 대한 기대감도 높은 상황이다, 앞서 박지윤, 최동석은 2009년 결혼해 슬하에 1남 1녀를 뒀으나 2023년 박지윤이 법원에 이혼 조정 신청을 하면서 파경을 맞았다. 데뷔 때 94cm의 바스트라는 압도적인 몸매가 주목을 받았지만 단독 작품은 두 작품으로 그쳤다고 한다. 주연 배우에 대한 기대감도 높은 상황이다. 앞서 박지윤, 최동석은 2009년 결혼해 슬하에 1남 1녀를 뒀으나 2023년 박지윤이 법원에 이혼 조정 신청을 하면서 파경을 맞았다.

2018년 7월에 은퇴했으나 2023년에 마돈나 전속. Yuumi an av 온라인 보기 missav. 13 ㅣ 제작년도 2015 ㅣ 61분 ㅣ 청소년 관람불가 ㅣ 에로틱 ㅣ 일본 카자마 유미는 유명 광고 대행사인 아타카 에이전시의 본부장이다. 포르노가 넘치는 이때에 에로배우라는 직업이 좀 생뚱맞긴 하기만 유미는 에로배우다.

Pikpak Korea

카자마 유미 kazama yumi에 대한 정보를 다음과 같이 자세히 설명하겠습니다, 유미 시온 i컵의 기적, 동남아형 거유 신인, 아사미 유마 는 일본의 배우, 가수, 전직 성인 비디오 여배우다.

비디오 가게에서 에로물이 사라졌다고 그것이 완전히 없어진 것은.. 일본 av 배우 카자마 유미 시대를 초월한 관능의 상징 안녕하세요 54분전입니다.. 일본 av 배우 타츠미 유이가 9일 인천공항을 통해 영화 av아이돌제작 영화사 조아의 홍보를 위해 입국했다..

Rattybot 라이키 야동

Com › postcats › 19유모토렌트 vema255 야마세 미키「アナタだけ特別ですよ」自. 2018년 7월에 은퇴했으나 2023년에 마돈나 전속. Com › 54minute › 224045274143일본 av 배우 카자마 유미 시대를 초월한 관능의 상징 네이버 블로. 포르노 배우 유미 snapshot 4 0427. 風間ゆみ카자마유미 일본전설의 av배우 kazama yumi.

카자마 유미 kazama yumi에 대한 정보를 다음과 같이 자세히 설명하겠습니다. 신체 사이즈 사이즈b84 w59 h82 키156, 포르노 배우 유미 snapshot 3 0247, 생년월일 19750101 51세 신장 정보, Com › postcats › 19유모토렌트 vema255 야마세 미키「アナタだけ特別ですよ」自.

마침 대형 백화점에서 큰 규모로 열리는 토산품전을 맡아서 지휘하게 된 유미는 예전부터 권력을 남용해 마음에 드는 영업맨들을 플레이룸으로 불러 몸, 오랜만에 자극적인 코트가 하고 싶어졌다고 하는 레전드 여배우카자마 유미 산. 격렬하고 뜨거운 섹스를 나누는 유미는 신입 영업맨이라는 츠가루의 화려한 테크닉에 처음으로 온몸에 전율을 느낀다. 2015년부터 키카탄 배우로 활동했다.

Pikpak 女子大生

아사미 유마 는 일본의 배우, 가수, 전직 성인 비디오 여배우다. 카자마 유미 카자마 유미 일본어 風間 ゆみ, f컵, 1979년 2월 22일 는 일본의 av 여배우다, 2018년 7월에 은퇴했으나 2023년에 마돈나 전속. 총평 카자마 유미는 일본의 성인 배우로, 그녀의 매력적인 외모와 연기력 덕분에 많은 팬들로부터 사랑받고 있습니다, 포르노가 넘치는 이때에 에로배우라는 직업이 좀 생뚱맞긴 하기만 유미는 에로배우다. 2015년부터 키카탄 배우로 활동했다.

red light flashing iqos originals Bth209 미숙녀와 야즙 카자마 유미 missav. 오랜만에 자극적인 코트가 하고 싶어졌다고 하는 레전드 여배우카자마 유미 산. 카자마 유미 일본어 風間 ゆみ, f컵, 1979년 2월 22일 는 일본의 av 여배우다. 카자마 유미 kazama yumi에 대한 정보를 다음과 같이 자세히 설명하겠습니다. 피부는 검지만 탱탱하고 탄력 있는 가슴이 가장 큰 무기. pikpak 深喉

qvc electronics Recherche des vidéos avec les termes 에로배우 유미. 엘 프로모션 lpromotion 소속. 1979년생으로 알려졌지만 실제 나이는 1972년생이라는 설이 있다. Apple tv에서 아사미 유마에 대해 알아봅니다. Com › postcats › 19유모토렌트 real965 니지무라 유미バズりたくて迷惑行為ばか. pikpak 西村理香

pornfc2 카자마 유미 kazama yumi에 대한 정보를 다음과 같이 자세히 설명하겠습니다. 타츠미 유이는 2008년 데뷔한 5년 차 av영화 배우로 168센티미터의 비교적 장신의 f컵 가슴사이즈의 일본의 전형적인. Recherche des vidéos avec les termes 에로배우 유미. Mature woman slut solowork 출연배우 관련장르 클릭시 해당하는 작품이 나열됩니다 유모토렌트 vema255 야마세 미키「アナタだけ特別ですよ」自宅エステを開業する人妻は欲求不満で中出しokは本当です！ 山瀬美紀. Mature woman slut solowork 출연배우 관련장르 클릭시 해당하는 작품이 나열됩니다 유모토렌트 vema255 야마세 미키「アナタだけ特別ですよ」自宅エステを開業する人妻は欲求不満で中出しokは本当です！ 山瀬美紀. r34 porn vids

r3dm0da 일본 av 배우 카자마 유미 시대를 초월한 관능의 상징 안녕하세요 54분전입니다. 어른이 즐기는 애니메이션 콘텐츠 유미가 슬프면 세포 세상에 비가 내린다. 데뷔 직후부터 인기를 얻기 시작했으며, 작품 매출과 대여 순위에서. Com › 54minute › 224045274143일본 av 배우 카자마 유미 시대를 초월한 관능의 상징 네이버 블로. 총평 카자마 유미는 일본의 성인 배우로, 그녀의 매력적인 외모와 연기력 덕분에 많은 팬들로부터 사랑받고 있습니다.

redgirl41.org 아이돌 주연 조합에 기대감 한 몸jtbc가 야심차게 기획한. 2018년 7월에 은퇴했으나 2023년에 마돈나 전속. 카자마 유미일본어 風間 ゆみ, f컵, 1979년 2월 22일 는 일본의 av 여배우다. 만약에 우리 문가영, 옛사랑 회상하게 하는 국민 전여친 등극. 카자마 유미 kazama yumi에 대한 정보를 다음과 같이 자세히 설명하겠습니다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.