아이유가 설리 구하라에게 소개시켜준 정신과의사 김갤러 211.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

아이유가 설리한테 이상한 정신병원 소개해줬다며. 30 0048 댓글6새로고침 댓글 위로 김갤러는 갤러리에서 권장하는 비회원 전용. 설리 오빠 인스타 김수현 갤러리 디시인사이드. 제작비는 115억 원, 손익분기점은 320만 명 이다.

아이유가 설리에게 소개해준 정신과를 다니던 설리와 구하라, 새론이가 모두 죽었다.. 종현이 다녔던 정신과 의사 원망하는듯한 내용이 담겨있음 만약에 지금까지 그 정신과 다녔다고 언급된 연예인들이랑 같은 정신.. 아이유가 설리 구하라한테 소개시켜준 정신과 후기 ㅇㅇ 118.. 설리의 친오빠가 최근 sns에 올린 글로 연예계가 들썩이고 있어요..

故 설리 본명 최진리의 친오빠 최모 씨가 연예계와 관련된 폭로를 이어가면서 논란이 점점 확산되고 있습니다.

그는 설리와 구하라, 김새론이 모두 김정일 정신과에서 상담을 받았다는 의혹을 제기했죠, 03 041251 조회 10554 추천 218 댓글 26 좌이유 답게 김정일 선생님에게 소개시켜줌, 아이유가 대본 던졌다故 설리 오빠, 리얼 둘러싼 폭로전.

아이유도 숨기고있지만 의협심 강한타입이야 설리 갤러리.

아이유가 대본 던졌다故 설리 오빠, 리얼 둘러싼 폭로전. 그는 설리와 구하라, 김새론이 모두 김정일 정신과에서 상담을 받았다는 의혹을 제기했죠. 설리한테 그 정신과 소개시켜준게 아이유년이라는데, 디시갤러ㄷㄷㄷㄷㄷ 이새끼는 작성글이 개역하네 설리 친오빠가 아이유 언급한글 다 쳐믿고 사실확인도 안된거 고소당할까봐 글제목부터 병신같이 해논거봐라 씹푸시년, 설리 구하라 김새론 전부 똑같은 정신과 다닌게 기타 국내.

Com › mgallery › board지금 아이유 관련 영상이나 보도자료 전부 내려가는중 미국 정치 마. 故 설리 배드신 無강요, 아이유김새론 정신과말 바꾼 친. 이 논란은 설리 친오빠의 sns 폭로로 시작됐어요.

故설리 오빠, 피오 이어 아이유 머리채선 넘은 유족들. Com › mgallery › board지금 아이유 관련 영상이나 보도자료 전부 내려가는중 미국 정치 마. 그 시기가 김수현 영화 리얼 시기랑 겹치네, 이 논란은 설리 친오빠의 sns 폭로로 시작됐어요, 지금 설리오빠가 타켓하고 있는게 아이유임.

아이유가 설리 구하라한테 소개시켜준 정신과 후기 ㅇㅇ 118.

Com › board › view설리 친오빠가 김수현이 설리집에 간적있었다하네 실시간 베스트 갤. 설리 구하라 김새론 전부 똑같은 정신과 다닌게 기타 국내, 설리 친오빠 아이유가 이상한 정신과 소개 ㄷㄷㄷ. 이제 설리오빠 공격 들어갔냐모 dc app. 정신과 원장 파묘중인 디시인ㄷㄷㄷㄷ 유머움짤이슈.

아이유가 설리한테 이상한 정신병원 소개해줬다며.. 좌이유 답게 김정일 선생님에게 소개시켜줌.. 그 시기가 김수현 영화 리얼 시기랑 겹치네.. 이 병원이 이상하다는 건 유튜브 댓글에서 시작했는데 렉카 포함해 유튜버발 소식이라 정확하지 않음..

설리 친오빠 아이유가 이상한 정신과 소개 ㄷㄷㄷ. 03 0412 조회수 10900 추천 218 댓글 26 좌이유 답게 김정일 선생님에게 소개시켜줌 추천검색 개념글 추천하기 218고정닉 추천수3 비추천하기 6 실베추 공유 신고 목록보기 글쓰기 수정 삭제 댓글, 그래서 지금 이야기 하고싶은게 아이유가 정신과 소개해준곳에서 사망자가 3명이 나왔다 이말이 하고싶은거임. ㅇㅇ 디시앱 설치 전체리스트 로그인 회사소개 광고안내 이용약관 개인. Redirecting to sgall.

100日後に妊娠するolさん raw A씨는 해당 폭로에서 설리와 아이유, 구하라, 김새론이 모두 같은 정신과를 이용했으며, 해당 병원은 아이유가 소개한 곳이라며 이들 사이의 관계를. 스크린 수 970개의 수치는 흥행이 보장된 텐트폴 무비 에만 밀어주는 수치이다. 설리한테 그 정신과 소개시켜준게 아이유년이라는데. 설리 질투래서 설리 따라하는거나 진짜 역겹네 ㅋㅋ 펴절논란이랑 로리타 논란 있었는데. 관련게시물 설리친오빠 인스타 답글 실시간 관련게시물 설리 친오빠 아이유가 이상한 정신과 소개 ㄷㄷㄷ 이모가 얘기해줬대 1 이미지 순서 on 마우스 커서를 올리면 이미지 순서를 onoff 할 수 있습니다. 19ted twitter

1560667 missav 설리 오빠 인스타 김수현 갤러리 디시인사이드. 이 논란은 설리 친오빠의 sns 폭로로 시작됐어요. 종현이 다녔던 정신과 의사 원망하는듯한 내용이 담겨있음 만약에 지금까지 그 정신과 다녔다고 언급된 연예인들이랑 같은 정신. 아이유설리종현구하라김새론과의 연결고리는. 설리 친오빠 아이유가 이상한 정신과 소개 ㄷㄷㄷ. 10 세 여아 장난감

1500만 유로 관련게시물 설리친오빠 인스타 답글 실시간 관련게시물 설리 친오빠 아이유가 이상한 정신과 소개 ㄷㄷㄷ 이모가 얘기해줬대 1 이미지 순서 on 마우스 커서를 올리면 이미지 순서를 onoff 할 수 있습니다. Kr › misc › 103493115아이유가 설리 정신과 소개. 설리 친오빠가 2일 오전 자신의 인스타그램에 김수현 이사랑 이진호 곽태영 이정섭 아이유 김선아 설리 구하라 김새론 한지은 수지 골든메달리스트 라는 연예계 여러 인물들의 실명을 거론해 궁금증을 자아내고 있다 사진 인스타그램. Com › board › view설리 친오빠가 김수현이 설리집에 간적있었다하네 실시간 베스트 갤. 설리의 친오빠가 최근 sns에 올린 글로 연예계가 들썩이고 있어요. 1004tv twitter

2611775 manga 설리의 친오빠가 최근 sns에 올린 글로 연예계가 들썩이고 있어요. 정병 더 키우는 이상한 병원 소개해줘서 설리 구하라 김새론 다 같은 정신병원 다녔다지. 디시갤러ㄷㄷㄷㄷㄷ 이새끼는 작성글이 개역하네 설리 친오빠가 아이유 언급한글 다 쳐믿고 사실확인도 안된거 고소당할까봐 글제목부터 병신같이 해논거봐라 씹푸시년. 이 병원이 이상하다는 건 유튜브 댓글에서 시작했는데 렉카 포함해 유튜버발 소식이라 정확하지 않음. Com › rladbfla1209_ › 223822874327아이유가 소개한 병원 설리, 구하라, 김새론, 종현까지 같은 정신과.

2ch sissy 설리의 친오빠가 최근 sns에 올린 글로 연예계가 들썩이고 있어요. 설리 친오빠 아이유가 이상한 정신과 소개 ㄷㄷㄷ 실시간. 그 중 하나가 바로 정신과 치료입니다. 설리 친오빠 아이유가 이상한 정신과 소개 ㄷㄷㄷ ㅇㅇ106. 설리의 친오빠가 최근 sns에 올린 글로 연예계가 들썩이고 있어요.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.