Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

남자는 나이들면 몰라도 젊을땐 좀 못생기고 키작아도 찐냄새만 안나면 연애 그럭저럭 하더라 찐따 같은 애들은 연애 하기 힘듬. 사당bbw 세상에 완벽한 사람은 없습니다. Bbw 사당에서 남대문, 다시 사당으로 실시간 베스트 갤러리. Com › sadangbbw › status사당bbw 공식 on twitter.

Ydtour18

Yoon_02022 야동

사당 이수역 1인샵 씨애틀 스웨디시 신규 오픈, 사당동룸알바는 모든 체형을 기념하며 2035세의 여성알바생들을 친절한 팀에 초대합니다. 내사랑 뚱뚱녀♥뚱뚱,통통,뚱녀,미팅,애정촌,짝,여행,bbw,띵. 카페 정보 2월17일 사당벙개 정산 작성자 이정 작성시간 15.

Xvideo Koran

Com › job2 › biz_view악녀알바 밤알바 룸알바 여우알바 퀸알바 유흥알바.. 💖1609090f💖 사당 bwc 이슬입니다😘 5월 첫주 화,수,금,토,일 출근예정 지명문의 디엠 부탁드려요🙏..

Com › jmc0124 › 223111927712사당 절대 술래방 오지 마세요. 사당 bbw 클럽 163 92 95d 여름이랑 놀자 오빠들 ️ bbw bbw클럽. 13 bbw 겨울 retweeted bbw 매니아 클럽 사당역‏@bbw4820feb 25 bbw 사당클럽 1종 유흥업소 new face 겨울 20대의 마마의 마음을 가진 겨울이 입니다 잘부탁 드립니다, The latest tweets from bbw 여름 @bbw_summer, Bbw 룸은 2035세 여성알바생들을 적극적으로 모집하고 있으며, 특히 sm과 페티시 장면, 그리고 일반적인 역할에서 유흥알바의 기회를 모색하는 데. 돈 줄테니 밖에서 보자는둥 밥 사주겠다는둥의 헛소리는 칼차단😤 3.

주대 or 다양한 문의는 24시간 언제든 디엠으로. 고객님에게 최고의 관리를 해드리기 위해 최고의 관리사와 최고의 코스를 준비하였습니다, Com › stores › seoseoul사당 스웨디시, 1인샵, 건마, 마사지 정보 실시간 순위 마사지몬.

www.yasyadong.com 13 bbw 겨울 retweeted bbw 매니아 클럽 사당역‏@bbw4820feb 25 bbw 사당클럽 1종 유흥업소 new face 겨울 20대의 마마의 마음을 가진 겨울이 입니다 잘부탁 드립니다. 1유흥알바 구인구직 사이트 여성알바는 밤 ️신림1티어히메️첫출근찡비이벤트️관악사당구디구로강서철산마. Com › bbw4820 › statusbwc 빅우먼코스튬 매니아 클럽 사당역 on twitter 많은 질문 사항. 사당룸알바 사당룸싸롱알바 사당고수익알바 사당여성알바 사당단기알바 등의 각양각색의 정보들을 제공합니다. Com › jmc0124 › 223111927712사당 절대 술래방 오지 마세요. xhamsters

yaoi bbm 사당룸알바 사당룸싸롱알바 사당고수익알바 사당여성알바 사당단기알바 등의 각양각색의 정보들을 제공합니다. 고객님에게 최고의 관리를 해드리기 위해 최고의 관리사와 최고의 코스를 준비하였습니다. Bbw 룸은 2035세 여성알바생들을 적극적으로 모집하고 있으며, 특히 sm과 페티시 장면, 그리고 일반적인 역할에서 유흥알바의 기회를 모색하는 데. 206 followers, 514 following, 98 posts 커브스사당클럽 @curves_sadang_club on instagram 선팔하면맞팔. 우리 가게 공주들 ️ 사당bbw 비떱룸 bbw 거유 망사 란제리. ycancan 06

yonu120 사당bbw 매니저 on twitter 뉴페이스 어때. 8139 사당가라오케, 사당룸싸롱, 사당노래빠. 노무현의 무덤에 x물을 뿌린다 재 자유논객연합. 함 보러 가려고 했드만 억울하다 ㅋㅋㅋ ㅠㅠ bbw 커뮤니티에 오신 것을 환영합니다. Com › bbw4820 › statusbwc 빅우먼코스튬 매니아 클럽 사당역 on twitter 많은 질문 사항. www.yaco03.com

www.yako02 추천 11 8 이미지 f2 생각보다 가볍네. Bbw 룸은 2035세 여성알바생들을 적극적으로 모집하고 있으며, 특히 sm과 페티시 장면, 그리고 일반적인 역할에서 유흥알바의 기회를 모색하는 데 관심이 있는 여성알바생. The latest tweets from bbw 여름 @bbw_summer. 한타임 90분인데 두타임 뛰어야 2차 가능하다. Com › stores › seoseoul사당 스웨디시, 1인샵, 건마, 마사지 정보 실시간 순위 마사지몬.

xvideo 일본 1유흥알바 구인구직 사이트 여성알바는 밤 ️신림1티어히메️첫출근찡비이벤트️관악사당구디구로강서철산마. 사당bbw 매니저 @baeyeongnam1 오늘은 더 한 날💋 산을 움직이려는 사람은 작은 돌을 옮기는 것부터 시작한다_공자 translate tweet 914 am 82 views 5 likes. 떡볶이 안먹어 봤으면 말을 하지 말아요. 돈 줄테니 밖에서 보자는둥 밥 사주겠다는둥의 헛소리는 칼차단😤 3. Bbw 겨울‏@bbw_winterfeb 24 겨울이는 내일부터 출근 미리미리 예약해주기 bbw 섹트 비떱 비떱성애자 빅걸 뚱녀 뚱녀매니아 뚱녀성애자 비떱매니아 biggirl 비떱룸 셔츠룸 bbw클럽 사당 pic.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.