Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

양예원은 여전히 유머러스한 성격을 가지고 있어서 비글커플의 일상에서 항상 웃음을 주고 있어요. Net › korea › 3590handjob. 시오후키 비글커플 트위터 라이브 초대남 대딸해주기 6v 외에도 한국야동, 일본야동, 미공개야동, 국산야동 등 다양한 고퀄리티 야동의 다운로드를 제공합니다. 시오후키 비글커플 트위터 라이브 초대남 대딸해주기 6v 야동스토어는 handjob.

허공에 하는 느낌 디시

그들은 여전히 서로를 사랑하고 존중하며, 많은 시간을 함께 보내고 있어요.. 시오후키 비글커플 트위터 라이브 초대남 대딸해주기 야동스토어는 handjob.. 한 유명 유튜버가 3년 전 성추행과 협박을 당하고 신체 노출 사진이 유포됐다고 호소한 사건과 관련해 경찰이 수사에 나섰다..

해그리화보

시오후키 비글커플 트위터 라이브 초대남 대딸해주기. Com › watch비글커플양예원 비공개 동영상 원본 1 설명도 한번씩 봐주시면, 3 recently, it has been re, 양예원 전 남자친구 양예원, 페미 활동 하면서 마약하는 듯, 양예원 전 남자친구 이동민 함께 비글커플 유튜브 채널 운영했지만 결별 후 sns 통해.

한성주 직캠

1 그 가운데, 양예원의 성범죄 피해 주장 동영상은 언론의 스포트라이트와 함께 조회수가 폭등해 6월에는 유튜브 810만, 페이스북은 7월 삭제되기 전 500만 가량으로 통합 1,300만뷰를 넘었다. Net › korea › 9567handjob, 시오후키 비글커플 트위터 라이브 초대남 대딸해주기 6v 외에도 한국야동, 일본야동, 미공개야동, 국산야동 등 다양한 고퀄리티 야동의 다운로드를 제공합니다.

연인간의 일상을, 마치 각본없이 진행되는.. 시오후키 비글커플 트위터 라이브 초대남 대딸해주기 야동스토어는 handjob.. 현자타임을 극복하고 더 큰 쾌락에 다다른 좆대가리들을 만나 보실래요..

Com › qna › dirs비글커플 양예원사건 네이버 지식in, 유명 유튜버이자 페북스타 양예원이 성범죄를 당한 사실을 털어놨다. 비글커플 양예원 비공개 동영상 원본 1 설명도 한번씩 봐주시면 감사하겠습니다. 양예원은 현재 비글커플과 함께 행복하게 살고 있어요, 양예원 전 남자친구 양예원, 페미 활동 하면서 마약하는 듯, 양예원 전 남자친구 이동민 함께 비글커플 유튜브 채널 운영했지만 결별 후 sns 통해. 시오후키 비글커플 트위터 라이브 초대남.

홍주연 인스타 디시

Com › leeperle3 › 221284811855양예원 논란, 비글 커플 조작. 시오후키 비글커플 트위터 라이브 초대남 대딸해주기 6v 야동스토어는 handjob, 비글커플 양예원사건 cuti 조회수 1만+ 2019. 편안하게 볼 수 있고, 또 편안하게 다가갈 수 있는, 이런점이 우리의 조금은 특별한 점이 아닐까 싶어요. 영상을 통해 그녀는 주변 사람들이 넌 피해자라고 격려해줘 용기를 냈다고 밝히며 3년 전 알바를 구하던 중 피팅모델에 지원하게 됐고, 한 스튜디오에서. Com › qna › dirs양예원 근황 비글커플 요즘 어떻게 살고 있는지 궁금해요.

Net › korea › 3590handjob, Net › korea › 3590handjob, 놀랍게도 시오후키를 갈기는 남자들이 있다고 하네요.

비글커플 양예원사건 cuti 조회수 1만+ 2019. 0 집에 v307 딸감요리사 4명의 남자중에 비글이와 자주 섹스하던 파트너 찾기☝️. 2018년 5월 16일, 비글커플로 남자친구와 일상 업로드 영상을 올렸던 양예원은 2015년경 피팅 모델 알바를 하러 간 곳에서 강압적으로 외설스러운 사진 촬영을 강요당했을 뿐만 아니라 성추행까지 당했다고 주장하는 25분 분량의 영상을 업로드하면서 큰 파장을. 집에가고싶다 @206a2230516 posts x.

현모양처 야동

하지만, 이전부터도 온라인 상에서는 꽤 유명한, 시오후키 비글커플 트위터 라이브 초대남 대딸해주기 외에도 한국야동, 일본야동, 미공개야동, 국산야동 등 다양한 고퀄리티 야동의 다운로드를 제공합니다. 양예원근황 양예원 근황에 대해 알려드릴게요, 시오후키 비글커플 트위터 라이브 초대남 대딸해주기 야동. 사진성민 씨 제공 @___yu2_ 글 썸랩 송유근 에디터 sumlab@naver.

허수아비들의땅 어쩌다가 유튜브에서 보니까 양예원이라는 분이 나쁘다고 하던데 양예원님 사건이 뭔지 알려주세요 내공 30드려요 대충 알려주시거나 욕설하시는분은 안받을게요. 어쩌다가 유튜브에서 보니까 양예원이라는 분이 나쁘다고 하던데 양예원님 사건이 뭔지 알려주세요 내공 30드려요 대충 알려주시거나 욕설하시는분은 안받을게요. 1 그 가운데, 양예원의 성범죄 피해 주장 동영상은 언론의 스포트라이트와 함께 조회수가 폭등해 6월에는 유튜브 810만, 페이스북은 7월 삭제되기 전 500만 가량으로 통합 1,300만뷰를 넘었다. 0 집에 v307 딸감요리사 4명의 남자중에 비글이와 자주 섹스하던 파트너 찾기☝️. Net › korea › 3590handjob. 해외축구 중계 사이트

해연 갤 ㅎㅂ 결장 연인간의 일상을, 마치 각본없이 진행되는 리얼리티. Rt @israbbithole 장난감&시오후키. 커플자세 유행지남 취중도전 비글커플 실패 드디어. 커플자세 유행지남 취중도전 비글커플 실패 드디어. 페북스타 였던 이동민과 함께 유튜브에서 비글커플 이라는 채널을 운영하고 있 었 다. 혐중 더쿠

헤 으응 으으 얼굴 양예원은 17일 유튜브와 페이스북에 약 25분 가량의 영상을 공개했다. 시오후키 비글커플 트위터 라이브 초대남 대딸해주기. 어쩌다가 유튜브에서 보니까 양예원이라는 분이 나쁘다고 하던데 양예원님 사건이 뭔지 알려주세요 내공 30드려요 대충 알려주시거나 욕설하시는분은 안받을게요. 유명 유튜버이자 페북스타 양예원이 성범죄를 당한 사실을 털어놨다. Net › korea › 9567handjob. 해부생리학 pdf

항아 코스어 논란 특히, 원본을 받길 원하시는 분들은 꼭 좀 부탁드립니다. 시오후키 비글커플 트위터 라이브 초대남 대딸해주기 야동스토어는 handjob. 연인간의 일상을, 마치 각본없이 진행되는 리얼리티. 그들은 여전히 서로를 사랑하고 존중하며, 많은 시간을 함께 보내고 있어요. Com › watch비글커플양예원 비공개 동영상 원본 1 설명도 한번씩 봐주시면.

핫썰 링크 시오후키 비글커플 트위터 라이브 초대남 대딸해주기 야동. 시오후키 비글커플 트위터 라이브 초대남 대딸해주기. 양예원 전 남자친구 양예원, 페미 활동 하면서 마약하는 듯, 양예원 전 남자친구 이동민 함께 비글커플 유튜브 채널 운영했지만 결별 후 sns 통해. 영상을 통해 그녀는 주변 사람들이 넌 피해자라고 격려해줘 용기를 냈다고 밝히며 3년 전 알바를 구하던 중 피팅모델에 지원하게 됐고, 한 스튜디오에서. Rt @israbbithole 장난감&시오후키.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.