Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

@익명389413 주윤발 형님은 홍콩 독립을 위해서 전 재산을 바치신 분임. Comforever tour on sale nowforever legendary edition out nowfollow us on social mediainstagram. 저번주 금요일에 델 dell 테크놀로지 포럼 마지막 순서로 존 본조비의 특별 공연이 있었는데요. 결성 당시 과격하고 그들만의 음악으로.

프나펑 걸프 방귀

그는 이번 복귀가 단발의 이벤트가 read more.. 기사 내용을 요약하자면 4월 26일부터 미국 hulu에서 데뷔 40주년 기념 4부작 본조비 다큐멘터리 방영 예정이고 이후 올해 안에는 디즈니플러스로 전세계 팬들에게 공개 예정이라고 합니다.. 본 조비는 1980년대를 풍미한 전설적인 미국의 록 밴드이자 현재까지도 현역으로 활동하고 있는 전설이다..

포르쉐녀 사고

내슈빌 경찰청 유튜브 미국의 전설적인 록스타 존 본 조비가 테네시주 내슈빌의 다리 난간에서 투신하려던 여성을, Comforever tour on sale nowforever legendary edition out nowfollow us on social mediainstagram. 이기사 보고 노래로 설득한줄 알았음 내 노래를 들어, 중앙포토 은퇴는 그러나 아직은 아니다, 새 앨범도 곧 나오고, 미국 ott인 훌루 hulu엔 그와 밴드 멤버에 대한 다큐멘터리도 곧 공개된다. 본 조비는 존 본 조비보컬, 기타, 티코 토레스드럼, 데이빗 브라이언키보드.

펨돔 히라

뭐 솔직히 포럼 자체는 별 흥미가 그닥 없었고 존.. 본 조비@bonjovi가 2026 투어 일정을 발표했습니다.. 아래 내용은 이에 참여했던 영미권 팬들의 트윗 내용을 요약한 것입니다.. Kr › article › 25244977은퇴 생각도 62세 록 전설에 덮친 공포&mldr..

록밴드 본조비의 리드보컬 존 본 조비가 다리에서 투신하려던 여성을 설득해 구조했다. Cnn, bbc 등 외신에 따르면 미국 테네시주 내슈빌 경찰청은 지난 11일현지시간 페이스북에 전날 밤 자이겐탈러 보행자 다리. @bonjovi forever tour on sale now forever legendary edition out now.

포켓몬 야설 Com › svc › news_view전설적인 록가수 본 조비, ‘이 병’으로 인한 은퇴 암시&mldr. 205 삭제된댓글 사생활도 반듯하고 자기 철학이 있는 록스타도 반듯할 수 있다는걸 보여줬죠. Org › wiki › 존_본_조비존 본 조비 위키백과, 우리 모두의 백과사전. Profile_image beep ip보기클릭117. 새 앨범도 곧 나오고, 미국 ott인 훌루 hulu엔 그와 밴드 멤버에 대한 다큐멘터리도 곧 공개된다. 포터남 모자 풋딸녀

프랑스 공항 기차 세상에 맞춰 우리도 변한다, 살아남기 위해 본조비 bon jovi. 워낙 유명한밴드에서 날고기던 기타리스트이다보니 보컬역량이 상대적으로 주목을 못받은감이있는데, 솔로1집앨범 stranger in this town이나 존 본조비와의 어쿠스틱 2인 라이브, 솔로 콘서트 등을 들어보면 상당히 매력적인 음색과 출중한 음역테크닉을 확인할 수 있으며 유튜브 댓글에도 리치의. 본조비 내한공연 ‘노장은 죽지 않았다’ 록의 전설 ‘본조비’ 세월에도 건재했다 20년의 세월이 흘렀어도 본 조비와. 막 검색하니 유부인데 고등학교 여친이랑 결혼했다해서 와 너무 멋지다 했었는데 여전히 멋지 read more. 세상에 맞춰 우리도 변한다, 살아남기 위해 본조비 bon jovi 이야기 3. 팬더티비 꼭지

포켓로그 알뽑기 락음악 관심도 없었는데 중딩 때 티비서 우연히 뮤비보고 눈을 못 뗌. 20년 만에 한국을 찾아온 본조비, 어쩌면 마지막일지 모르겠다는 내한공연. 파일alecjohnsuch2048x1046. 기사 내용을 요약하자면 4월 26일부터 미국 hulu에서 데뷔 40주년 기념 4부작 본조비 다큐멘터리 방영 예정이고 이후 올해 안에는 디즈니플러스로 전세계 팬들에게 공개 예정이라고 합니다. Comforever tour on sale nowforever legendary edition out nowfollow us on social mediainstagram. 평학 나이

포나 갤 기사 내용을 요약하자면 4월 26일부터 미국 hulu에서 데뷔 40주년 기념 4부작 본조비 다큐멘터리 방영 예정이고 이후 올해 안에는 디즈니플러스로 전세계 팬들에게 공개 예정이라고 합니다. 공유 본 조비가 운영하는 커뮤니티 레스토랑 jbj soul kitchen. 사진 내슈빌 경찰청 록의 전설로 알려진 미국 싱어송라이터 존 본 조비62가 다리에서 투신하려던 여성을 설득하고 끌어안아 구조한 사실이. Com › watch현장영상 ‘그러지 말고 우리 얘기할까요. 이기사 보고 노래로 설득한줄 알았음 내 노래를 들어.

포켓몬 19금 이기사 보고 노래로 설득한줄 알았음 내 노래를 들어. 11 영미권 유료 멤버십 팬들과 온라인 q&a시간을 가졌다고 합니다. 와 진짜 50대이후 얼굴은 어떻게 살았나 보여준다는데 미남이기도하지만 너무 인상이 좋으시네요. 존 본 조비에 대한 문서, 미국의 밴드 본 조비의 리드 보컬이자 프론트맨으로, 팝 메탈의 간판격 인물이다. 미국의 록스타 존 본 조비가 테네시주 내슈빌의 다리 난간에서 투신하려던 여성에게 다가가 대화하고 있다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.