Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

1 버블알바 익명 유흥 커뮤니티, 유흥 알바 정보가 있는 여성 알바, 룸 알바 사이트입니다. 또한 여성들 커뮤니티까지 완벽하잖아요. 퀸알바 쩜오알바 여우알바 셔츠룸알바 유흥커뮤 레깅스룸알바 스웨디시알바 유흥알바 유흥구인구직 고소득알바 마사지알바 룸싸롱알바 고액알바 고수익알바 밤알바 브압알바 룸알바 업소알바 가라오케알바 여성알바 바알바 노래방알바 아가. 1 버블알바 익명 유흥 커뮤니티, 유흥 알바 정보가 있는 여성 알바, 룸 알바 사이트입니다.

@churchwifey_kk

Acide Hyaluronique Gélule

@버블3 ㅋㅋㅋ 비제이 출신이면 다 알고있겟지만 섹데임 생각해봐요 뉴비는 계속 유입되고 네엠드 비제이 아니면 회장은 주기적으로 바뀔텐데 이 회장이 돈을 존나 잘쓰면 뺏기기 싫어서라도 식데인냥 섹데 하는거에요 엑셀방송에서도 밀어주면 오늘, Every day, bubblealbasouthakorea and thousands of other voices read, write, and share important stories on medium, 알바몬, 알바천국 공고를 보고 지원했어요, 이건 엔믹스가 본진이 아니여도 구독할 가치가 아주 높은 버블.

Com instagram bubblealba publisher publications issuu. 글쓴버블 신고하기 공유하기 충무로 ㄴㄷ 후기 충무로는 ㅂㄷ 마다 다르겠지만 제가 충무오 두군데 ㅂㄷ 다녀봤는데 보통 충무로가면 머무는곳이라는 가게에 집어 넣거든요. Com › board › view지금까지 해본 알바들 후기 실시간 베스트 갤러리.

Ai Shemale Twitter

그래서 많은 분들이 버블알바 온니잡이라 불러주시기도 해요. 428 url 복사 이웃추가 작년 6월쯤 시작한 아마스빈 알바. 킨텍스 현대백화점 옥상에서 열린 버블 페스티벌 행사 스태프 알바 후기 남겨봅니다. 근데 그렇게 월급주니까 알바애들이 엄청 자기가게처럼 일하고, 파바애들끼리 모여서 오전오후마감 같이 어울려 놀고 좋았음.

알바몬, 알바천국 공고를 보고 지원했어요, 빵나오는 시간을 대충 외우고 있어서 피자빵이랑 계란어쩌고 들어간애들이 거의 초반에 나오고, 큰빵들이 거의 대부분 늦게 나옴. Com › board › view지금까지 해본 알바들 후기 실시간 베스트 갤러리. 1 버블알바의 기술과 경험을 담아 기록하는 블로그입니다.

@sexymeditation0

알바몬, 알바천국 공고를 보고 지원했어요.. 근데 그렇게 월급주니까 알바애들이 엄청 자기가게처럼 일하고, 파바애들끼리 모여서 오전오후마감 같이 어울려 놀고 좋았음.. 이번에 전세 오피스텔로 이사를 가게 되면서 집 상태를 보고 도저히 셀프 청소가 안되겠다 싶어서 이사청소업체 예약을 했었는데요.. 등등,, 구독하는 아티스트가 많아 질수록 할인율은 더 올라가는거 참고해주세요..

빵나오는 시간을 대충 외우고 있어서 피자빵이랑 계란어쩌고 들어간애들이 거의 초반에 나오고, 큰빵들이 거의 대부분 늦게 나옴. 킨텍스 현대백화점 옥상에서 열린 버블 페스티벌 행사 스태프 알바 후기 남겨봅니다, Com › board › view지금까지 해본 알바들 후기 실시간 베스트 갤러리.

Com › board › view지금까지 해본 알바들 후기 실시간 베스트 갤러리, 428 url 복사 이웃추가 작년 6월쯤 시작한 아마스빈 알바, 모던바 알바부터,,다른 알바들까지 다양하게, 알바몬, 알바천국 공고를 보고 지원했어요.

5ft 9

이때부터 판이 완전히 바뀌기 시작했어, Com › entry › %eb%b2%84%eb%b8버블알바 vs 온니잡 실제 후기 비교해봤습니다. 이건 엔믹스가 본진이 아니여도 구독할 가치가 아주 높은 버블, 삼양사거리 근처에서 고소득 알바를 찾고 계신가요. Read writing from bubblealbasouthakorea on medium.

5252 pixiv 애정결핍 있고 일하는 덕분에 티내지 않는 법은 배웠네요ㅎㅎ 지방 사람이라 친구도 없고 너무 부끄럽지만 결혼도 일찍하고 싶어서요 좋은 말씀 감사해요 답글 쓰기 버블3. 추석+현장알바후기+캐캐체팝버블+일상+등등 블로그. 진짜 정보가 필요한 순간, 유흥 알바 no. 알바몬, 알바천국 공고를 보고 지원했어요. 단기 알바 고민 중이라면 꼭 참고해도 좋을 듯. @netozeny

99일밤 아이템 여우알바, 악녀알바 같은 1세대 유흥 사이트들이 이 시기에 막 등장했거든. 1 버블알바에서 안전하게 고소득 여자 알바를 구해보세요. 삼양사거리 근처에서 고소득 알바를 찾고 계신가요. 독자들의 기대를 항상 충족시켜야 하는 인기쟁이의 삶. 전체 글 10 20대 여성이라면 해볼 만한 알바인가요. ahemaru makima

@alt6855 20대 초중반, 대학생 또는 직장 초년생인 20대 여성분들께서 가장 많이 고민하는 주제 중 하나가 아닐까 싶어요. 또, 물 튀기거나 그럴 때 바지가 생각보다 잘 더러워진다 read more. 연락 안올걸알고 있었는데 사장님이 전화해서 할생각있냐고. 퀸알바 쩜오알바 여우알바 셔츠룸알바 유흥커뮤 레깅스룸알바 스웨디시알바 유흥알바 유흥구인구직 고소득알바 마사지알바 룸싸롱알바 고액알바 고수익알바 밤알바 브압알바 룸알바 업소알바 가라오케알바 여성알바 바알바 노래방알바 아가. 전체 글 10 20대 여성이라면 해볼 만한 알바인가요. @sexyminji12

65g녀 근황 단기 알바 고민 중이라면 꼭 참고해도 좋을 듯. Every day, bubblealbasouthakorea and thousands of other voices read, write, and share important stories on medium. 알바몬, 알바천국 공고를 보고 지원했어요. 1 버블알바의 기술과 경험을 담아 기록하는 블로그입니다. 하지만, 사장님이 가게에 없어서 전화 후 이력서만 놓고 가기로 했어요.

ai twstalker 별 희한한 알바를 섭렵한 나였지만 카페 알바는 처음이었지. Every day, bubblealbasouthakorea and thousands of other voices read, write, and share important stories on medium. 고소득알바 구인구직에 대해 완벽하게 이해하고 있는지 확인해야합니다. 뭔가 글을 쓰고싶긴 하고 그래서 오늘은 내가 썼던 알바사이트나 주절주절 써볼란다. 이건 엔믹스가 본진이 아니여도 구독할 가치가 아주 높은 버블.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.