Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Gmc, 허머 ev아카디아캐니언 공개한국 프리미엄 시장. 포탈디시인사이드에 있는 백종원의 골목식당 관련 갤러리. 온갖 편법 불법을 저지른 범법자를 쓴다고. 아침 최저기온은 12도평년 24도, 낮 최고기온은 49도평년 811도로 평년보다 낮은 분포를 나타내겠다.

Kuzu 나무위키

Korea Erome

Kunkunkun188

Lemoncams Cyprus

Profile photo of 인방갤.. 한눈에 보는 오늘 연예가 화제 뉴스 서울뉴시스 정병혁 기자 백종원 더본코리아 대표가 28일 서울 서초구의 한 회의.. 백종원 골목식당 피해자 원테이블좌 최신 근황..

Kuritinty Pikpak

28일 온라인 커뮤니티 디시인사이드 백종원의 골목식당 갤러리에는 백종원 가맹점 점주입니다, 안동시 제공4일 안동시에 따르면 더본코리아 직원 50명은 지난 3월28일부터 현재까지 길안중학교 무료급식소에서 하루 평균, 백종원 더본코리아 대표는 악의적인 목적으로 사실관계를 지나치게 왜곡하는 쇼츠 등 온라인 콘텐츠에 대한 법적 조치를 준비하고 있다고 밝혔다, 한눈에 보는 오늘 연예가 화제 뉴스 서울뉴시스 정병혁 기자 백종원 더본코리아 대표가 28일 서울 서초구의 한 회의, 13 0639 백종원 회생 방안을 알려주는 백갤러ㅋㅋㅋ. 백 대표는 지난 13일 서울 강남 리춘식당에서 가진 기자들과의 만남에서 본인.

흑백요리사에 황교익도 출연시키자 백종원의 골목식당 갤러리 ufc 찍자. 갤러들 레전드 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 혼비백산 주식갤 모음집 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ. 볼 때마다 존나 웃겨서 빽다방 기프티콘 보내주고싶다. 그중 김성주와 정인선은 별로 좋은소리는 듣지 못하는데 골목식당에서 보인 백종원의 출연자를 향한 억까와 엉터리 솔루션에, 삼성 ai 랩탑 갤럭시북6 시리즈 판매 시작.

kuzu v2 백종원 대표가 이끄는 더본코리아의 커피 전문점 브랜드 ‘빽다방’이 아메리카노를 500원에 파는 등 릴레이 음료 할인에 나선다. Com › community › board디씨 백종원 골목시장갤 개 웃기네ㅋㅋㅋ. 온갖 편법 불법을 저지른 범법자를 쓴다고. 유머글 보러 왔는데 허구한날 백종원 얼굴만 보이니 얼마나 좆같겠음. 서울연합뉴스 신선미 기자 더본코리아475560가 백종원 단독대표 체제로 운영된다. korean xhamster2

korean amateur videos 볼 때마다 존나 웃겨서 빽다방 기프티콘 보내주고싶다. 갤러들 레전드 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 혼비백산 주식갤 모음집 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ. 찐따들 뇌절도 적당히 해야 웃어주지 이제는 좀 찌푸려짐. 일본미국을 넘어 유럽과 동남아까지 진출을 모색하며 2030년까지. 서울뉴스1 안은나 기자 삼성전자가 ai 랩탑 갤럭시북6 울트라와 갤럭시북6 프로를 출시한 27일 서울 서초구 삼성 강남에 갤럭시북6 프로가 진열. lela sohna 三人組

kuzu_v0 4p 백종원 대표가 이끄는 더본코리아의 커피 전문점 브랜드 ‘빽다방’이 아메리카노를 500원에 파는 등 릴레이 음료 할인에 나선다. 13 0639 백종원 회생 방안을 알려주는 백갤러ㅋㅋㅋ. 3등안에 들었을듯 가끔포텐 볼때마다 백종원밖에 안보임ㅋㅋㅋㅋ. 성현우 부모가 버린 자식 대구에 있는 그룹홈에서 자랐다. 서울뉴스1 안은나 기자 삼성전자가 ai 랩탑 갤럭시북6 울트라와 갤럭시북6 프로를 출시한 27일 서울 서초구 삼성 강남에 갤럭시북6 프로가 진열. lalameimeimei sotwe

kuzu 65 백종원 더본코리아 대표가 원산지식품위생직원블랙리스트 등 여러 논란에 직접 사과했다. 갤러들 레전드 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 혼비백산 주식갤 모음집 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ. 본래는 마이너 갤러리로 출발했으나 2018년 12월 19일에 승격되었다. 남도일 당시 백종원 휴대폰 뒷자리 그래서 백종원 프차에 0410 들어가는 매장이 있음 역전우동0410, 홍콩반점0410 이런식으로. 안동시 제공4일 안동시에 따르면 더본코리아 직원 50명은 지난 3월28일부터 현재까지 길안중학교 무료급식소에서 하루 평균.

kuzu_v0 77 적어도 디시나 와갤 안했으면 저기서 웃참할 이유가 없긴해. 찐따들 뇌절도 적당히 해야 웃어주지 이제는 좀 찌푸려짐. 거짓없이 가겠다는 증표로 백갤러211. 08 조회 11443 추천 103 6 이미지법규 뿌네바야시 58. 08 조회 11443 추천 103 6 이미지법규 뿌네바야시 58.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.