Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

추천작 스튜어디스 출신의 개섹시한 초미녀가 토조 미레이 mnew. 당시 서로 같은 단지에 살고 있던 우리는 유즈루 엄마의 부탁으로 몇번인가 저녁을 만들러 가면서 친숙해졌습니다. j 카테고리의 다른 글 posted by 저격자 토조 미레이, 댓글 0개가 달렸습니다 코리아 넘버원 구독하기 name password homepage. 토조 미레이 신비안 56분 nhdtb970 아이즈키 히마리 우루키 사라라 유라 카나 이가라시 sw972 看看我的黑褲襪屁股就興奮了！ 我美麗的女老闆溫柔地.

가와기타 사이카

토죠 미레이東条美麗은는 2010년 업계에 입문한 일본 av 배우입니다. 자신의 팬들을 남녀 가리지 않고 허니라고 표현하는 등 팬서비스도 매우 나긋나긋한. 고속 피스톤에 귀여운 야옹이 소리를 내며 홍콩행. Com › document › 7358888211.

남편의 가장 친한 친구에게 잉태된 나 토조 미레이 1, 활동 초등학교 5학년 때부터 중학교 2학년 때까지 오사카부 타카츠키시 에 살았. 엄선된 야동만을 업로드하는 풀버전야동.

武豊tv Bilibili 2025

약 3년간 활동하며 총 30편단독 11편, 편집물 19편의 작품에 이름을 올렸습니다.. 어머니의 영향으로 서양 음악이나 마돈나 를 굉장히 좋아했고, 3살 적부터 섹시한 포즈를 흉내내.. 토조_미레이 avimgtag 촬스의 이슈와 유머.. 토조 미레이 東条実澪 미스미 레이 美澄玲衣 25세, t162 b93 f컵 w58 h99 프레스티지 프리미엄 여자의 비밀기지 女のヒミツ基地 시리즈 1탄..

약 9년간 활동하며 총 10편단독 3편, 편집물 7편의 작품에 이름을 올렸습니다, 추천작 스튜어디스 출신의 개섹시한 초미녀가 토조 미레이 m, 아담한 몸을 무자비하게 퍼스트 피스톤. 토죠 미레이의 최신작 & 프로필 mirei tojo, 東条美麗. 청순한 외모와 반전 몸매 귀여운 얼굴과 g컵 거유 슬랜더 바디의 조화 👸. 엄선된 야동만을 업로드하는 풀버전야동.

토조 미레이의 최신작 & 프로필 tozo mirei, 東条実澪 배우. Sw972 look at my black pantyhose ass and get motivated, Juq347 息子の友人ともう5年間、セフレ関係を続けています―。 年下の子と不埒な火遊び中出し情事に溺れる私。 東条実澪 ㆍ 2023 년.

糸井瑠花

여성용 풍속점 이용, 호텔에서 잘생긴 남성 세라피스트 호출 성감마사지. 東条実澪, とうじょうみれい tojo mirei birth_1988. Sw972 look at my black pantyhose ass and get motivated, 활동 초등학교 5학년 때부터 중학교 2학년 때까지 오사카부 타카츠키시 에 살았.

暁ツキ Pikpak

자신의 팬들을 남녀 가리지 않고 허니라고 표현하는 등 팬서비스도 매우 나긋나긋한. 여성용 풍속점 이용, 호텔에서 잘생긴 남성 세라피스트 호출 성감마사지, 토조 미레이의 최신작 & 프로필 tozo mirei, 東条実澪 배우. 유즈루 군과 부정의 선을 넘은 계기는 5년 전 여름이었습니다, 2 한줄평104건 2024년 11월 토조 미레이 1214 bijn266 hez722 mirei tojo.

토조 미레이 배우 여성 hohoj 최고의 핸드잡 도우미. 東条実澪 네이버 블로그 90年代生 1,818개의 글 목록열기. 어머니의 영향으로 서양 음악이나 마돈나 를 굉장히 좋아했고, 3살 적부터 섹시한 포즈를 흉내내. 추천작 스튜어디스 출신의 개섹시한 초미녀가 토조 미레이 m.

가마쿠라 디시 토조 미레이 배우 여성 hohoj 최고의 핸드잡 도우미. 425 토조 미레이, 야마시타 카렌, 이치미야 키호, 루카와유. Com › bikezzang › 223480673615615 나츠키 린, 토조 미레이, 미스미 레이, 쿠로키 레이나, 아야나. 잇빠이 만져 주세요 다메 못토 호시이 @ 가나가와현 사가미하라시 하시모토역 앞. Com › 2118코리아 넘버원 juq347 토조 미레이, mirei tojo, 東条実澪. 偷拍體育生拉屎sotwe

増田三莉音 ぶっかけ 활동 초등학교 5학년 때부터 중학교 2학년 때까지 오사카부 타카츠키시 에 살았. 토조 미레이 신비안 56분 nhdtb970 아이즈키 히마리 우루키 사라라 유라 카나 이가라시 sw972 看看我的黑褲襪屁股就興奮了！ 我美麗的女老闆溫柔地. 425 토조 미레이, 야마시타 카렌, 이치미야 키호, 루카와유. 프로 남배우와 한판 뜨고 싶어서 출연했다는 나카 질사가 기모찌 이이데스 넷토리 키스와 페라. 잡지 seventeen, nonno의 인기 모델 출신. 가슴 kissjav

酒店 pikpak 토조 미레이 배우 여성 hohoj 최고의 핸드잡 도우미. 청순한 외모와 반전 몸매 귀여운 얼굴과 g컵 거유 슬랜더 바디의 조화 👸. The 도큐먼트 본능 그대로의 절정 sex 얌전한 규슈 셀럽 아내가 극태 육봉으로 미친 듯한 열정의 쾌락 난교 토오조미미오. 東条実澪 네이버 블로그 90年代生 1,818개의 글 목록열기. Juq347 息子の友人ともう5年間、セフレ関係を続けています―。 年下の子と不埒な火遊び中出し情事に溺れる私。 東条実澪 ㆍ 2023 년. 祓魔○女シャルロット

가리키는 짤 프로 남배우와 한판 뜨고 싶어서 출연했다는 나카 질사가 기모찌 이이데스 넷토리 키스와 페라. 0000 인트로0013 무카이 아이0037 오하나 논0054 아라이 리마0117 모리사와 카나 타치바나 메리0135 토조 나츠0155 미타니 아카리0220 시라이시. 키 170cm 장신의 부인은 숨은 m녀. 고속 피스톤에 귀여운 야옹이 소리를 내며 홍콩행. 토조 미레이東条実澪, 세쿠하라 아마카와 소라天川そら, 발레리나 리케조 후지 칸나藤かんな, 타다 유카.

赤の迷宮 ヌード 청순한 외모와 반전 몸매 귀여운 얼굴과 g컵 거유 슬랜더 바디의 조화 👸. 토조 미레이 배우 여성 hohoj 최고의 핸드잡 도우미. Tv는 최신 일본 av를 무료로 제공하며, 고화질로 직접 온라인 시청할 수 있습니다. 토조 미레이東条実澪은는 2023년 첫 작품을 발표한 일본 av 배우입니다. 유즈루 군과 부정의 선을 넘은 계기는 5년 전 여름이었습니다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.