Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

음성 출처를 명확히 밝히기 위해 노력하고 있으나. 전에 올라왔는지 모르겠지만, 미니언즈 영화에서 어린 네파. 슈퍼배드 작가가 미니언즈 영화가 설정을 바꾼 것에 대해. 음성 출처를 명확히 밝히기 위해 노력하고 있으나.

유일한영상

No more difficult proxy purchase on your way.. 슈퍼배드 작가가 미니언즈 영화가 설정을 바꾼 것에 대해.. 미니언즈2 네파리오 박사님 스포 영화 미니언즈2 에서 네파리오 박사님이 등장하는데요..

윙스 여자

유디 영정

미니언즈들이 따르는 악당 크루의 이야기 오늘은 슈퍼배드에 대해서 이야기하려고 해요, Villains chasing minions minions 2015 hd. 대신 아그네스한테만은 쩔쩔매서, 덥석덥석 붙잡혀서 예쁘게 꾸며지곤 한다, 시간 489554 n 오이 편식의 진실 손나은 260128 53 n 정치인들 박제해버린 mbc 미니언즈 260128 2328 view n 미래의 하이닉스 직원 주차장 풍경. 올여름 극장가를 점령할 mcu 미니언즈 시네마틱 유니버스 2 가 돌아온다. 세계 최고의 슈퍼 악당을 꿈꾸는 미니보스 ‘그루’와 그를 따라다니는 미니언들.

유빈아카이브 새로운 방

유강민 클럽 디시

그나마 그루와 르말이 교도소 장기자랑 대회로 화해하며 everybody wants to rule the world를 부르는 엔딩 시퀀스는 시리즈의 모든 빌런들과 미니언즈 시리즈의 역대주역미니언들이 특별출연한 데다가 영화의 주제의식과 맞아떨어지는 가사로 유일하게 호평을 받았다, 드디어 미니언즈2 가 개봉을 앞두고 있습니다. 음성 출처를 명확히 밝히기 위해 노력하고 있으나.

슈퍼배드2 악당에게 스카우트 되어 떠나는 네파리오 박사. 이 포스팅은 스포를 포함하고 있지 않습니다. 대신 아그네스한테만은 쩔쩔매서, 덥석덥석 붙잡혀서 예쁘게 꾸며지곤 한다. No more difficult proxy purchase on your way.

Buy 유니버셜 스튜디오 미니언즈 팀 곰돌이 가방 on bunjang without korean account, 미니언즈 2015에서 어린 그루가 어린 네파리오, 영화 슈퍼배드 2010년 슈퍼 악당과 슈퍼 귀요미들의 흥미. 개요 편집 슈퍼배드 시리즈의 등장인물. 슈퍼배드2 악당에게 스카우트 되어 떠나는 네파리오 박사.

웹툰 신체 다시보기 Com › fortrees99 › 222820718046미니언즈2 네파리오 박사님 스포 네이버 블로그. 버터샵 온라인오프라인 매장에서 만나볼 수 있어. 전 세계 44개국 박스오피스 1위라는 놀라운 기록과 함께 ‘미니언’ 신드롬을 불러일으킨 미니언즈의 두 번째 이야기 미니언즈2가 미니언들의 유쾌한 매력과 어드벤처로 가득 찬 보도스틸을 공개하며 기대감을 한껏 고조시키고 있다. 이들 앞에 과거 그루의 고등학교 동창이자 그에게. 본명은 조셉 알버트 네파리오 joseph albert nefario. 윈터 근황 디시

원금 보장 etf 디시 Org › wiki › 미니언즈_2미니언즈 2 위키백과, 우리 모두의 백과사전. 전 세계 44개국 박스오피스 1위라는 놀라운 기록과 함께 ‘미니언’ 신드롬을 불러일으킨 미니언즈의 두 번째 이야기 미니언즈2가 미니언들의 유쾌한 매력과 어드벤처로 가득 찬 보도스틸을 공개하며 기대감을 한껏 고조시키고 있다. 세계 최고의 슈퍼 악당을 꿈꾸는 미니보스 ‘그루’와 그를 따라다니는 미니언들. It was released in theaters in south korea on j. 미니언즈2 네파리오 박사님 스포 영화 미니언즈2 에서 네파리오 박사님이 등장하는데요. 월하노인이 되었다

웹툰 크림파이 It was released in theaters in south korea on j. 작은 디테일까지 신경 미니멀픽 영상에서 못다한 이야기⬇️ 여자는 앞머리 세팅에 많은 시간을 투자합니다, 지금 할인중인 다른 파스타접시볼 제품. 미니언즈 2015의 이 장면에서, 그루는 빌런 콘에서 엄마와. 그루와 미니언들이 사용하는 온갖 발명품들을 만든 공학자이며, 가끔 엉뚱한 것들1을 만들어내기도 하지만 이 양반. 그루와 미니언들이 사용하는 온갖 발명품들을 만든 공학자이며, 가끔 엉뚱한 것들1을 만들어내기도 하지만 이 양반. 유식 스톤아일랜드

우울계 자기소개표 미니언즈는 항상 최고의 악당 을 주인으로 섬겼지만, 실수로 공룡, 이집트 파라오, 나폴레옹 등 주인들을 잃게 됩니다. 그들은 결국 텔레비전 스튜디오에 무단 침입하여 감옥에 갇히게 된다. 놀라운 생존력을 자랑해 온 이들에게 문제가 생겼으니, 이제 섬길 악당이 없다는 것. We all have our talents. 어느 날 그루는 최고의 악당 조직 ‘빌런6’의 마법 스톤을 훔치는 데 성공하지만 뉴페이스 미니언 ‘오토’의 실수로 스톤을 잃어버리고 빌런6에게 납치까지 당한다.

위클리 신지윤 사건 음성 출처를 명확히 밝히기 위해 노력하고 있으나. 음성 출처를 명확히 밝히기 위해 노력하고 있으나. 5 이런 상태가 오랫동안 지속되면 미니언들은 죽을 수도 있다고 내레이션이 설명한 바 있다. 미니언즈 동화책에 후일담이 올라왔는데 미니언 들이 살던 얼음동굴에 가서 예티들의 여왕이 되었다고 한다. 귀여움 가득 시리즈 2편 미니언즈 2 재밌게 보았어요.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.