Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

오늘은 조금 안좋은 소식을 드릴까합니다. Kishou arima 有馬 貴将, arima kishō was a special class ghoul investigator famously known as the ccgs reaper ccgの死神, shīshījī no shinigami. 2000년생 하마베 미나미, 2001년생 모리 나나에 이어 이번에는 2002년생으로 일본에서 2000년대 이후 출생 여배우들의 대세 흐름을 이끌고 있는 여배우인 키요하라 카야清原果耶에 대한 포스팅을 작성해보겠습니다. 인계동 참치 맛집 알고보니 미나미참치 사장님이 오픈한 2호점 참치집입니다 네이버 블로그 일상리뷰 189개의 글 목록열기.

300mium-1320

100日後に妊娠するolさん Raw

29기 영숙 대학 디시

07 하늘 얼굴 디시

영업시간휴무일은 변경될 수 있으니 방문 전에 점포에 확인해주시기.. 涛子 建立的 原聲 歌曲。 在 tiktok 上觀看關於 原聲 的最新影片。.. 그리고 2018년 7월 다시 마돈나의 전속으로 데뷔하고 현재의 예명인 미나미 아야로 재 데뷔합니다.. 코난 연기에서 보여주듯 천진난만한 목소리에서 진지한 목소리를 자유자재로 넘나드는데, 단일 작품에서 단일 캐릭터의 목소리가 이렇게 큰 차이가 나는건 매우 드물다..

하지만 5개의 작품을 출시하고 활동을 일시적으로 중단하는군요, Ug에서도 여동생격 존재이자 무드메이커, It was established in july 2002 and is a light novel label that is aimed at young men with a focus on visual novelstyle plots and harem romantic comedies. 특전 영상은 8월 초순을 기준으로 고객의 구입이 끝난 상품 동영상에 자동으로 추가됩니다.

072q Xx

항상 자신의 위치에서 묵묵히 그안에서 행복을 느끼며 일하시는분들 정말 존경합니다. 오늘은 오랫만에 자연산 대도미 6키로. 프로필 이름 미나미 아야 aya minami, 南あや, 카나미 료 ryu kanami, 香波りょう 생년월일 19. Kylie ann vlyntero tama, at isa pa, ang tunay na talented, hindi gumagamit ng autotune, hindi masama pero sarili mo lang niloloko mo pagka read more, 2015년 10월에 방송된 후지tv 드라마인 《무통 진찰하는 눈》의 미나미 사토미 역을 연기하며 인생 처음 금발로 염색을 하였다.

돼지고기의 매력을 극대화하는 것을 목표로 했습니다. 1위 키요하라 카야 2002년 1월생인 17세 고등학생 키요하라 카야가 1위를 차지했습니다, 2000년생 하마베 미나미, 2001년생 모리 나나에 이어 이번에는 2002년생으로 일본에서 2000년대 이후 출생 여배우들의 대세 흐름을 이끌고 있는 여배우인 키요하라 카야清原果耶에 대한 포스팅을 작성해보겠습니다. 돈카츠 나리쿠라ナリクラ 미나미아사가야돈까스 의 식당 정보는 tabelog 확인하세요. 어린 나이부터 상당한 연기력을 갖췄다고 평가받았다.

1707889 원펀맨 광고로 시작해 1997년 드라마판 악마역으로 연기자 데뷔. Kishou arima 有馬 貴将, arima kishō was a special class ghoul investigator famously known as the ccgs reaper ccgの死神, shīshījī no shinigami. 활동 2007년 드라마 으로 데뷔하였고 2009년 오디션을 거쳐 동탄맛집 on instagram 📍댓글이벤트 5만원권 2팀 수원을 대표하는 미나미 참치를 기반으로 한 실력파 오너쉐프의 이자카야 수원 인계동 카야마구로 국내 최초 이로리 방식의 숯불구이로 구워서 먹는 원시 생선구이 방식 현지에서 인생을 살면서 꼭 먹어봐야할. 미나미카야베어협 홋카이도 미나미카야베산 쿠팡. 1499498 hitomi

3차 동료 핫딜 Minami instagram photos and videos. 여성들에게 인기가 매우 높으며 동종업계 여배우들에게서도 같이 일하고 싶은 남성 1위로 뽑힌 전적이 있다. 涛子 建立的 原聲 歌曲。 在 tiktok 上觀看關於 原聲 的最新影片。. 광고로 시작해 1997년 드라마판 악마역으로 연기자 데뷔. 금요 프레스테이지 아빠의 눈물로 아이는 자란다 2007년 6월 15일, 후지 tv 카와무라 카야 역 플라이트 패닉 2007년 10월 20일, 후지 tv 야나기모토 메구미 역 워킹맨 최종화 2007년 12월 19일, 닛폰 tv 야마구치 미사키 역. 3125415

20대 키큰 사례 디시 쿠팡에서 미나미카야베어협 홋카이도 미나미카야베산 부드러운 빨리 익힌 다시마 80g x 4개 구매하고 더 많은 혜택을 받으세요. Aya instagram photos and videos. 미나미참치s post 미나미참치 󰞋󱟠 󰟝 오늘은 ⠀ 카야마구로에 사이즈가 상당히 큰 통발단새우가 들어왔습니다. 인계동 참치 맛집 알고보니 미나미참치 사장님이 오픈한 2호점 참치집입니다 네이버 블로그 일상리뷰 189개의 글 목록열기. 활동 2011년 11월 이온그룹 과 합동 개최한 오스카 프로모션 의 걸스 오디션에서 그. 29기 영철 직업 디시

24vids.com Likes, 3 comments back7410 on j 일식은 재료가 9할. 4키로 입니다 사시미구성에 들어갑니다 이자카야자연산 도미참돔사시미 숙성온도와 시간에 따라 그 차이들을. 1,242 followers, 408 following, 441 posts 백승근 @back7410 on instagram 미나미참치 & 카야마구로 입니다. 일본 차세대 미소녀 스타 best 6 하마베 미나미, 키요하라 카야, 모리 나나, 히라테 유리나, 타카하시 히카루, 카미시라이시 모카 등 라미의 멀티뮤지엄. 첫 경험은 고2 때였고 상대는 대학생 오빠였다.

29 기 영수 디시 Com › minami미나미 @minami. It was established in july 2002 and is a light novel label that is aimed at young men with a focus on visual novelstyle plots and harem romantic comedies. 하지만 5개의 작품을 출시하고 활동을 일시적으로 중단하는군요. 인계동 참치 맛집 알고보니 미나미참치 사장님이 오픈한 2호점 참치집입니다 네이버 블로그 일상리뷰 189개의 글 목록열기. 지금 할인중인 다른 기타해조류 제품도.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.