16k followers, 201 following, 20 posts 문서윤 @_seoyuniya on instagram.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

현재 공개 된 인스타 사진들을 살펴만 보아도 본투비 아이돌이라고 느껴질 정도의 상당한 비주얼을 자랑했는데요. 현재 공개 된 인스타 사진들을 살펴만 보아도 본투비 아이돌이라고 느껴질 정도의 상당한 비주얼을 자랑했는데요. 4,063 likes, 0 comments _seoyuniya on aug 사진만 봐두 더워주거. 사실 문서윤 씨는 지난 2024년부터 더블랙레이블 연습생들의 사진에서 모습을 드러내 데뷔 가능성이 꾸준히 언급돼 왔습니다.

요즘 Kpop의 인기는 정말 대단한데요, 빌보드에서부터 코첼라 그리고 유럽 페스티벌까지 전 세계를 휩.

Com › Entry › 신세계외손녀신세계 외손녀 문서윤 인스타 사진 모음.

16k followers, 201 following, 20 posts 문서윤 @_seoyuniya on instagram.. 997 followers 777 following 1252 posts @sy_moon05 ✨️ ㆍ 달빛조각사 게임 ost ㆍ 디즈니ㆍ픽사《코코》 미겔 ᆞ 드림웍스《보스베이비》팀 ᆞ 드림.. 신세계 외손녀 문서윤의 나이, 프로필, 데뷔 및 열애설에 대한 정보를 다룬 블로그 글입니다..

I love @schiaparelli ✨. 진짜부부 진짜팥 커플 송수연 이혼 이유. 팀 내 래퍼 역할을 하고 있으며, 맏언니다, 요즘 연예계 팬덤, 패션, 아니 우리나라까지 동시에 들썩이게 만든 더블랙레이블 테디의 new 혼성그룹.

Annie Moon 문서윤 Annie At Sbs Gayo Daejon 2025 Alldayproject Anniemoon 문서윤 Theblacklabel 더블랙레이블 Instagram.

2023년 1월 9일, 시나연예 등 중국 매체는 지드래곤 권지용과 이명희 신세계그룹 회장의 외손녀 문서윤 씨의 열애설을 보도 했습니다. Com › september794 › 223907135954신세계 손녀 테디 걸그룹 문서윤 애니 인스타, 나이, 논란 네이버. 신세계 그룹의 외손녀인 문서윤 활동명 애니 annie의 프로필을 간단하게 정리해봤습니다 신세계 회장 정유경, 신세계 2대 회장 정용진 공동 신세계 그룹의 회장인 정용진의 외조카인 문서윤은 미국 보딩스쿨 출신으로, 국내에 복귀 후 연습생 시절을 보내고. 요즘 연예계 팬덤, 패션, 아니 우리나라까지 동시에 들썩이게 만든 더블랙레이블 테디의 new 혼성그룹, The real one annie 문서윤 anniemoon, 신세계 외손녀 문서윤 열애설의 증거는 신세계 외손녀 문서윤이 인스타그램에 올린 사진과 지드래곤의 콘서트 관람.

코다 쇼세이 디시 애니는 23일 자신의 소셜미디어에 반려견과 함께 찍은 사진을 올리고 24. 신세계 외손녀 애니, 반려견과 나란히 누워 소탈한 생일 포착. 신세계 외손녀 문서윤 열애설의 증거는 신세계 외손녀 문서윤이 인스타그램에 올린 사진과 지드래곤의 콘서트 관람. 1m followers 157 following 43 posts @anniesymoon. Annie moon 문서윤 🖤 @anniemoon. 키오프 하늘 latest

코와가리 리유 asmr 디시 Comanniesymoon annie @anniesymoon instagram 사진 및. Com › voiryunn문서윤 @voiryunn instagram photos and videos. 457 followers, 234 following, 11 posts 문서윤 @voiryunn on instagram. 문서윤 직업 신인 배우로 프로필 정보는 본명 문서윤, 나이 1995년생으로 28살이라고 합니다. 신세계 외손녀 문서윤 열애설의 증거는 신세계 외손녀 문서윤이 인스타그램에 올린 사진과 지드래곤의 콘서트 관람. 콜롬비나 온필드 디시

켈빈녀 야동 팀 내 래퍼 역할을 하고 있으며, 맏언니다. 요즘 테디가 수장으로 이끄는 더블랙레이블 걸그룹 데뷔 소식이 많은 화제를 보이고 있는데요. 그룹 올데이프로젝트allday project 멤버 애니본명 문서윤가 자신의 미국 컬럼비아대 이메일 주소가 유출됐다고 고백했다. 그런데 이제는 뮨서윤 인스타에서 보던 그 조용하고 단아한 이미지의 그녀가 yg 계열 더블랙레이블에서 아이돌 데뷔를 준비중이라니. 팀 내 래퍼 역할을 하고 있으며, 맏언니다. 키리 판다

쿠지라 방귀 Com › mucaldiaproc › 223893305037신세계 외손녀 문서윤 누구 나이 프로필 테디 걸그룹 인스타 네이버. The real one annie 문서윤 anniemoon. 요즘 테디가 수장으로 이끄는 더블랙레이블 걸그룹 데뷔 소식이 많은 화제를 보이고 있는데요. 요즘 테디가 수장으로 이끄는 더블랙레이블 걸그룹 데뷔 소식이 많은 화제를 보이고 있는데요. Ikr annie worked hard for almost ten years just to convince her.

키사라기 준코 신세계 정유경 회장의 딸, 아이돌 데뷔. 신세계 정유경 회장의 딸, 아이돌 데뷔. Com › september794 › 223907135954신세계 손녀 테디 걸그룹 문서윤 애니 인스타, 나이, 논란 네이버. 문서윤 신세계손녀 문서윤애니 애니인스타 문서윤애니인스타 신세계손녀인스타 s. 지드래곤 신세계 외손녀 지드래곤과 신세계 이명희 회장 외손녀의 열애설은 중국 연예매체 시나연예에서 지난 9일 보도되었는데요.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.