신세계 그룹의 외손녀 문서윤 씨와 삼성家의 이원주 씨가 대표적이다.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

뉴스 단독 신세계 손녀 애니 문서윤, 빅뱅 대성 만났다. 더갤러는 갤러리에서 권장하는 비회원 전용 갤닉네임입니다. ‘1호 재벌 아이돌’로 불리는 문서윤 문서윤 22은 이명희 신세계그룹 회장의 외손녀이자 정유경 신세계백화점 총괄사장의 장녀다. Kr › news › articleview대기업 이끄는 3040 오너들의 등장 issue 기사본문 우먼.

프로듀서 테디가 설립한 소속사 더블랙레이블 Theblacklabel 소속의 신인 혼성 아이돌 그룹 올데이 프로젝트 Allday Project가 올해 데뷔해 화제를 모으고 있는 현재, 그룹 소속으로 활동 중인 신세계 재벌 4세 문서윤 애니 Annie가 엄청난 인기를 끌고 있습니다.

그리고 다음 정권은 매운맛 문재인이라는 이재명이 당선 거의 99퍼 확정인 상황에서 190석의 무소불위의 권력으로 진짜 문재인 정권에서도 못했던 온갓 read more.. 문서윤 프로필나이 문서윤은 2002년 1월 23일생으로 만 22.. 신세계 그룹의 외손녀 문서윤 씨와 삼성家의 이원주 씨가 대표적이다..

2002년생으로 올해 21살인 문서윤 씨는 Sns에서 수만 명의 팔로어를 보유하고 있다.

여기 맨 오른쪽 신세계 딸이라는데 더블랙 연습생 마이너.

공식적으로 문서윤이라는 실명이 언급되진 않았지만, 애니의 이미지, 스타일, 기존 인스타 활동 이력과 겹치는 부분이 많아 동일 인물이라는 추정이 확산. 단독 신세계 손녀 애니 문서윤, 빅뱅 대성 만났다 써클차트. Kr › news › articleview대기업 이끄는 3040 오너들의 등장 issue 기사본문 우먼. 문서윤은 신세계 총괄회장 이명희 외손녀이다. 문씨는 신세계 이명희 총괄회장의 외손녀이며, 정용진 회장의 질녀조카딸. 테디가 이끄는 더블랙레이블의 5인조 혼성.

문서윤 애니 남친 사무엘 지디 언급되는 이유 인스타 신세계 외손녀 문서윤이 ‘allday Project’ 데뷔 멤버로 지목되며 주목받고 있습니다.

저 사진으로 미국인지 아닌지 어케아라, 뉴스 단독 신세계 손녀 애니 문서윤, 빅뱅 대성 만났다. 문서윤의 갤로그 게시물106 공개 댓글121 공개 스크랩0 공개 방명록0 방명록 차단 설정 갤로그 설정 갤로그 설정.

본가야 저 강아지 이름 read more. 정유경 총괄사장의 어머니는 이명희 신세계그룹 총괄회장이며 오빠는 정용진 신세계그룹 회장이다, 더블랙레이블의 신인 걸그룹 연습생을 소개하는 사진 게시물이 5일 여러 커뮤니티에 올라왔다, 신세계 정유경 회장의 장녀 문서윤활동명 애니씨가 빅뱅 태양과 블랙핑크 로제, 전소미 등이 소속된 소속사의 신인 5인조 혼성 그룹으로 데뷔한다.

단독 신세계 손녀 애니 문서윤, 빅뱅 대성 만났다 꽃길.

메디먼트뉴스 김진우 기자 신세계 정유경 총괄사장의 장녀이자 이명희 신세계그룹 회장의 외손녀인 문서윤 씨가 아이돌 그룹 데뷔를 앞두고 있어 연일 뜨거운 관심이 쏠리고 있다. 애니 활동명, 남자친구 사무엘 추정, 지디 열애설 해명, 인스타 등 모든 정보를 정리했습니다. 문서윤은 정유경 신세계백화점부문 총괄사장의 딸이다. ‘1호 재벌 아이돌’로 불리는 문서윤 문서윤 22은 이명희 신세계그룹 회장의 외손녀이자 정유경 신세계백화점 총괄사장의 장녀다.

겠지 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ 내눈엔 그냥 그나잇대 애기같애, 뉴스 단독 신세계 손녀 애니 문서윤, 빅뱅 대성 만났다. 혼성그룹 올데이 프로젝트 멤버인 애니는 최근 자택 주방으로 보이는 곳에서 라이브 방송을 진행했다, 최근 그녀가 아이돌 그룹 올데이 프로젝트의 멤버로 연예계에.

패션, 스타일 등 연예인보다 트렌디한 모습으로 주목받는 재벌가 4세들. 미국 뉴욕에서 명문 컬럼비아대학교를 졸업했다. 10일 엑스포츠뉴스는 문서윤 근황을 단독으로 전했다. 애니 문서윤은 아빠 문성욱 신세계라이브.

‘1호 재벌 아이돌’로 불리는 문서윤 문서윤 22은 이명희 신세계그룹 회장의 외손녀이자 정유경 신세계백화점 총괄사장의 장녀다. 문서윤 씨는 2002년 생으로 신세계그룹 이명희 회장의 손녀이자, 백화점부문 총괄사장인 정유경 사장의 딸이다. 신세계 외손녀 문서윤 역시 이 걸그룹 멤버로 거론된 바 있다. Com › economy › market_trend신세계 정유경 회장 장녀, 5인조 혼성그룹으로 데뷔한다. 정유경 신세계 총괄사장과 문성욱 신세계인터내셔날 부사장 겸 신세계톰보이 대표이사 사이의 장녀 문서윤 씨 가 대표적이다, 그리고 다음 정권은 매운맛 문재인이라는 이재명이 당선 거의 99퍼 확정인 상황에서 190석의 무소불위의 권력으로 진짜 문재인 정권에서도 못했던 온갓 read more.

xvideos 더갤러는 갤러리에서 권장하는 비회원 전용 갤닉네임입니다. 보도에 따르면문서윤의 걸그룹 합류가 불발됐다. 10일 엑스포츠뉴스는 문서윤 근황을 단독으로 전했다. 단독 신세계 손녀 애니 문서윤, 빅뱅 대성 만났다 꽃길. 겠지 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ 내눈엔 그냥 그나잇대 애기같애. xyoungza

xvideo 주소 역시내가슴팍은틀리지않았어 쟤한테는 천하의 이명희도 아할머니. Com › board › view신세계 외손녀 문서윤, 다이아수저 아이돌로 데뷔 임박&mldr. 최근 그녀가 아이돌 그룹 올데이 프로젝트의 멤버로 연예계에. 여기 맨 오른쪽 신세계 딸이라는데 더블랙 연습생 마이너. 뉴스 단독 신세계 손녀 애니 문서윤, 빅뱅 대성 만났다. xy 코르니

xvideos3 여기 맨 오른쪽 신세계 딸이라는데 더블랙 연습생 마이너. 단독 신세계 손녀 애니 문서윤, 빅뱅 대성 만났다 써클차트. Net › square › 3032175620더쿠 얼마예요 연예인보다 핫한 재벌가 4세&mldr. 프로듀서 테디가 설립한 소속사 더블랙레이블 theblacklabel 소속의 신인 혼성 아이돌 그룹 올데이 프로젝트 allday project가 올해 데뷔해 화제를 모으고 있는 현재, 그룹 소속으로 활동 중인 신세계 재벌 4세 문서윤 애니 annie가 엄청난 인기를 끌고 있습니다. 삼성 장남 이지호 컬럼비아대 재학중 장녀 이원주 시카고대학 재학중 현대차 장녀 정진희 웨즐리 여대 장남 정창철 미국유학대학미상 sk 장녀 최윤정 시카고대 생물학 학사 차녀 최민정 베이징대 경영학 학사. youjung_ee

yadonglarty 신세계 그룹의 외손녀 문서윤 씨와 삼성家의 이원주 씨가 대표적이다. 그리고 신세계 총괄사장 정유경의 딸이며, 신세계 정용진 회장의 조카이기도 하다. 단독 신세계 손녀 애니 문서윤, 빅뱅 대성 만났다 꽃길. 비즈톡톡 아이돌 데뷔 후 신세계 f&b 지원 사격한 문서윤 마케팅 시너지 확대 관측도 정유경 회장 맏딸, 신세계 브랜드 트웰브 sns에 게시 문서윤, 신세계 z세대 공략 통로로 부상하나 업계, 패션뷰티 접점 확대 가능성에 주목 biz. 신세계 정유경 회장의 장녀 문서윤활동명 애니씨가 빅뱅 태양과 블랙핑크 로제, 전소미 등이 소속된 소속사의 신인 5인조 혼성 그룹으로 데뷔한다.

www.yaburi63 생애 1943년 9월 5일 일제강점기 당시. 2002년생으로 올해 21살인 문서윤 씨는 sns에서 수만 명의 팔로어를 보유하고 있다. 문서윤 프로필나이 문서윤은 2002년 1월 23일생으로 만 22. 단독 신세계 손녀 애니 문서윤, 빅뱅 대성 만났다 써클차트. 저 사진으로 미국인지 아닌지 어케아라.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.