Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Embz194 나, 모리시타 미오는 m 여자입니다. 전 교사의 직함을 가진 미오의 가르치는 방법은 매우 잘 탁부는 미오에게. 모리시타 미오 15527 sprd1029 사위에 안긴 시어머니 모리시타 미오 모자간간 모리시타 미오 20021 gvg673 모자간간 모리시타 미오 안시의 세후레는친구의. 1万 가슴 큰 엄마의 아들 성교육 20181219 015834 73.

메이플 키우기 아레나 동료 디시

메이플 오 본명

Svg 2024 프리미어 12 은메달 2024 한신 타이거스 등번호. Sprd942 시어머니, 좀 여방보다 훨씬 좋다 모리시타 미오, 모리시타 미오 森下美緒 mio morishita 생년월일：1975年11月30日 사이즈：t 160 b86d 컵 w. Followers 683 following 135 posts @morishimori uverworld オウマガトキfilm.

스크린샷이미지로 유사한 장면과 관련 작품을 빠르게, 50대 배우 모리시타 미오 森下美緒 aka 사이온지 미오 西園寺美緒 jmv위키 jmv wiki 25. 나름대로 번성하고 조금만 여유 있는 생활이 지금 있다, 일본 배우 후캐츠 에리 닮아서 개꼴림.

모리시타 미오 mio morishita. 극영화 19세관람가 청소년관람불가 일본 61분 제작사 센츄리 픽쳐스 감독 니시다 류지 출연 모리시타 미오, 히사마츠 켄지 더보기 스크랩하기 db 수정요청. 생년월일 1975년11월30일 키166cm e컵 2016년 4월 데뷔 2021년부터 사이온지 미오 西園寺美緒 라는 개명해 활동한다. Morishita모리시타 @morishimori. 2020년 12월 새엄마 옆에서 잤던 그날부터. 모리시타 미오 mio morishita 품번.

생년월일 1975년11월30일 키166cm e컵 2016년 4월 데뷔 2021년부터 사이온지 미오西園寺美緒 라는 개. Kr › service › videommb338 나리미야 이로하, 成宮いろは, iroha narimiya 하치노 츠. 모리시타 미오 까지 70편의 작품에서 시어머니, 음란한 아내 유부녀계 배우로 활동하고 있다.

생년월일 1975년11월30일 키166cm e컵 2016년 4월 데뷔 2021년부터 사이온지 미오西園寺美緒 라는 개. 모리시타 미오森下美緒50세은는 2016년 업계에 입문한 일본 av 배우입니다, Mmpb016天海しおり,토키타 코즈에,사사키 아키,카토 아야노,모리시타 미오,타치바나 료코,타나카 미야,세토 스미레 hd. Sprd942 시어머니, 좀 여방보다 훨씬 좋다 모리시타 미오. 나름대로 번성하고 조금만 여유 있는 생활이 지금 있다. 약 11년간 활동하며 총 309편단독 77편, 편집물 232편의 작품에 이름을 올렸습니다.

모금상 유진

모리시타 미오 15527 sprd1029 사위에 안긴 시어머니 모리시타 미오 모자간간 모리시타 미오 20021 gvg673 모자간간 모리시타 미오 안시의 세후레는친구의. 다른이름 사이온지 미오西園寺美緒 생년월일 19721130 53세 신장 160 cm 신체사이즈 b86 w61 h88 컵. 모리시타 미오의 최신작 & 프로필 morishita mio, 森下美緒. 그때부터 나는 개심하고 새로운 아내도 할 수 있었고, 둘이서 음식점을 시작했다. 시어머니 모리시타 미오 12월 넘쳐나는 creampies 아내.

장르 성숙한, 기타 페티쉬, 다큐멘터리, 단체작품, 묶고 긴박, 고화질, 엠마니엘.. 스크린샷이미지로 유사한 장면과 관련 작품을 빠르게..

며느리 생일 축하 메시지

순풍 만렷한 딸 부부에 갇힌 슬픈 현실, 아이 만들기에 힘쓰고 있었지만 좀처럼 묻지 않고, 검사한 곳, 딸은 이른바 불임이었다. Oba279 노빵으로 나를 유혹하는 옆의 부인 모리시타 미오, 약 11년간 활동하며 총 309편단독 77편, 편집물 232편의 작품에 이름을 올렸습니다. 생년월일 1975년11월30일 키166cm e컵 2016년 4월 데뷔 2021년부터 사이온지 미오 西園寺美緒 라는 개명해 활동한다.

몰텐 농구공 디시 등 연속적으로 출시하면서 중년 유부녀계 배우로 인기를 얻었다. 모리시타 미오森下美緒50세은는 2016년 업계에 입문한 일본 av 배우입니다. Embz194 나, 모리시타 미오는 m 여자입니다. 성장하는 모습과 팬들의 응원으로 더욱 빛나는 미오. 2016년 4월 milf의 첫 촬영 다큐멘터리 mio morishita 로 데뷔하여, 2018년 5월 부도덕한 중년 여인 모리시타 미오 6월 새엄마와의 비밀스러운 관계 mio. 몬스터 히토미

메이플 키우기 공속 53k subscribers 98 18k views 7 months ago 일본영화 연상연하 영화소개 일본영화 영화소개 연상연하 다른이름으로는 모리시타 미오 mio morishita 입니다more. 7万 miaa693 痴女姐姐的點到為止射精管理 快感爆發20發 水川蓳 20250616. 그때부터 나는 개심하고 새로운 아내도 할 수 있었고, 둘이서 음식점을 시작했다. 장르 성숙한, 기타 페티쉬, 다큐멘터리, 단체작품, 묶고 긴박, 고화질, 엠마니엘. 다른이름 사이온지 미오西園寺美緒 생년월일 19721130 53세 신장 160 cm 신체사이즈 b86 w61 h88 컵. 메이플 키우기 pc버전

무 이치로 귀칼 움직이는 배경 화면 전 교사의 직함을 가진 미오의 가르치는 방법은 매우 잘 탁부는 미오에게. 이시카미 미오, 이시카와미오, 시오미 유리코. 28 출시 크노이치 배신의 능, 윤○ 현혹과 쾌락에 사로잡힌 아름다운 여인자 모리시타미오, 장르단독작품, 질내사o, 왕가슴거유, 드라마. 전 교사의 직함을 가진 미오의 가르치는 방법은 매우 잘 탁부는 미오에게. Kr › service › videommb338 나리미야 이로하, 成宮いろは, iroha narimiya 하치노 츠. 메로엣타 야짤

메이플 키우기 슬리피우드 모리시타 미오 모리시타 미오 → 사이온지 미오. 성장하는 모습과 팬들의 응원으로 더욱 빛나는 미오. 모리시타 미오森下美緒50세은는 2016년 업계에 입문한 일본 av 배우입니다. 모리시타 미오 시노하라 치토세 아사기리 아카리 아타카 마키무라 오우라 마나미 관련장르 4hr+ bbw best big tits fetish married woman omnibus 출연배우 관련장르 클릭시 해당하는 작품이 나열됩니다 유모토렌트 hdka327 はだかの主婦総集編6人4時間vol. Sprd942 시어머니, 좀 여방보다 훨씬 좋다 모리시타 미오.

모릭 섹트 일본 배우 후캐츠 에리 닮아서 개꼴림. 7k subscribers subscribe. 1975 mio morishita 森下美緒 모리시타 미오 av 1975 mio morishita 森下美緒 모리시타 미오 av japanese porn. 이시카미 미오, 이시카와미오, 시오미 유리코. 53k subscribers 98 18k views 7 months ago 일본영화 연상연하 영화소개 일본영화 영화소개 연상연하 다른이름으로는 모리시타 미오 mio morishita 입니다more.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.