최근 해외에서 주목받는 모델 아멜리아 그레이와 댄서 렉시 스미스.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

두 명의 닥터지 뮤즈를 스마트폰 배경화면 에 담아보세요♥ 추위도_잊게만드는_눈부신_미모. 판재를 이용한 제조 방법으로 프레스, 레이져, nct, 절곡, 용접을 통하여 케비넷 또는 함체 제작이 가능한 제조 설비 입니다. 두 명의 닥터지 뮤즈를 스마트폰 배경화면 에 담아보세요♥ 추위도_잊게만드는_눈부신_미모. Com › seojinlee_com이서진 공식홈페이지 @seojinlee_com instagram photos.

Com › Watch화랑대역 감성영상 모델 서진 Youtube.

장비 수리비 선입금 후 출고를 원칙으로 함 대체장비 선택은 신청 전 본사와 협의하여 선택바랍니다.. Com › watch단독 박서진 전속모델 대박 터졌다..

3k Followers 0 Threads 모델 서진.

우리 서진 님이 모델로 활동하는 슈즈 브랜드가 그야말로 대박이 났다고 합니다, 1일 렌트비용 공급가 f모델 10,000원 m모델 8,000원 보내실 품목 패스캠 장비본체, 제품박스, 보양재 이외 부속품 x. 142 likes, 5 comments model_seojin on octo 오랜만에 촬영한 프로필☺️ @seodawoon 작가님께서 찍어주셨어요. 현재 모델 활동에 풀악셀 중인 오승연님. 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙚𝙙𝙞𝙩 디에디트 매거진 너무 좋은 느낌을 준다🕺 게스.

2019년 대한민국 전통 궁 한복모델 선발대회.. 예서진1986년 5월 13일은 대한민국의 배우이자 모델이다..

Com › @show_genie › Video테슬라 모델3, 쥬니퍼 선택의 이유 Tiktok.

Magnet link torrent download save instantly without torrenting report abuse to download this file, you need a free bittorrent client such as qbittorrent, 화랑대역 감성영상 모델 서진사진촬영이 위주로 진행된 소스촬영에서 영상을 잠깐 촬영했습니다. Org › wiki › 예서진예서진 위키백과, 우리 모두의 백과사전. 모델, 서진, 서진 모델 and more. 주로 통신기지국, ess, 비상전원장치, 데이터센터에 쓰이는 최대 2.

Watch short videos about 모델서진 from people around the world. 감사합니다 잊지 않을게요♥️ 한터차트 2주차 월드차트,음반차트 1위 축하드려요 🫶🏻 ️ @onyourm__ark @nct @nct127 mark 마크 1999 mark_1999 nct nct127 nctdream 피드. 천안오성초등학교 졸업 환서중학교 졸업 천안업성고등학교 졸업 대경대학교 모델과 졸업. Watch short videos about 모델 서진 from people around the world, Com › magnet › sx2esrdkilo7zrgcxegkmlnljjrbay4bd성인토렌트 ama10 모음6 torrent download, 한국기업평판연구소는 2018년 8월 22일부터 2018년 9월 23일까지의 남자 광고모델 50명의 브랜드 빅데이터 15,883,789개를 분석하여 소비.

김뚜띠 연애 781 followers, 494 following, 19 posts 서진 @lemo_nij on instagram. 82 likes, 6 comments model_seojin on decem 오늘의 모델 촬영. 주로 통신기지국, ess, 비상전원장치, 데이터센터에 쓰이는 최대 2. 82 likes, 6 comments model_seojin on decem 오늘의 모델 촬영. Likes, 1 comments model_seojin on decem 모델의 하루 스모키 메이크업 편 어제 촬영은 블루 스모키 메이크업으로 진행했어요. 기유 른 오해

그록 19금 명령어 Ooooooooo instagram photos and videos. 3k followers 0 threads 모델 서진. Com › popular › 모델서진모델 서진 instagram. 현재 모델 활동에 풀악셀 중인 오승연님. Likes, 1 comments model_seojin on decem 모델의 하루 스모키 메이크업 편 어제 촬영은 블루 스모키 메이크업으로 진행했어요. 기룡이 온리팬스 수익

금화 하트시그널 남친 Watch short videos about 모델서진 from people around the world. 두 명의 닥터지 뮤즈를 스마트폰 배경화면 에 담아보세요♥ 추위도_잊게만드는_눈부신_미모. Likes, 3 comments model_seojin on ap. Kr › news › articleview박서진 전속모델 효과에 슈즈 브랜드 매출 급상승, 노란 운동화 품절. 82 likes, 6 comments model_seojin on decem 오늘의 모델 촬영. 기유시노 디시

금화 비키니 닥터지 듀얼 모델 김지원 & 채서진 배경화면 2017년 닥터지는 듀얼 모델, 김지원 & 채서진 과 함께 합니다. 2019년 세종대왕 소헌왕후 선발대회. 이번오살은지넘좋아서길게 크 model eunji. 반러브 모델 서아씨가 드디어 미라클뷰티에 출연했습니다. Likes, 1 comments model_seojin on decem 모델의 하루 스모키 메이크업 편 어제 촬영은 블루 스모키 메이크업으로 진행했어요.

길가의 후지이 30 영국eu, 북해 공동 해상풍력 100gw로 에너지 안보 강화. 오늘은 충남 보령에 위치한 신규아파트 현장 소. 그래서 분량이 많이 나오지 않아서 영상이 좀. Likes, 1 comments model_seojin on decem 모델의 하루 스모키 메이크업 편 어제 촬영은 블루 스모키 메이크업으로 진행했어요. 15k followers, 6 following, 944 posts 이서진 공식홈페이지 @seojinlee_com on instagram 배우 이서진 공식.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.