Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

자기 말에 공감하거나, 공감되는 말을 하면 목소리 톤이 높아진다. 쿠로바스아오키세 바보와 모델은 사랑을 한다. 따라서 ng+7 악마의 종 쿠로의 부적 없음은 위의 세 가지를 결합한 것으로, 게임에서 가장 어려운 난이도입니다. 말수가 적은 쿠로세는 우리가 시키는 대로 by dancyo.

가부키초 마사지

수학여행편 hkdjgost 20251017 183023 조회 11878 좋아요 23.. 말수가 적은 쿠로세는 우리가 시키는대로 교외학습편.. 수학여행편 hkdjgost 20251017 183023 조회 11780 좋아요 23..

가디안 결혼

道場にーにアサシーノ

그래서인지 구두쇠인듯하나 1000엔짜리 음악cd에 좋아하는곡이 하나만있어도 사기도 한다.. 131 약간 그 감성임 말수가 적은 쿠로세양 시키는대로.. 일본어 원작에서의 캐릭터 이름의 의미는 의외로 단순하다.. 그랬더니 아오미넷치가 뭐라고 욕을 했고, 저도 read more..

쿠로바스아오키세 바보와 모델은 사랑을 한다. 오승환도 가장 애교가 많은 막내아들이다. 형들이 다들 성격이 좋아서 경호가 군기.

가슴 디시

여러분이 지금 말수가 적어도 괜찮아요. 쿠로바스적흑 rabbit or wolf, 만화 《사키 saki》의 등장인물 로 성우는 하나자와 카나, 쿠로바스적흑 rabbit or wolf, 쿠로바스황청황 ill be there with you novel 티스토리.

말수가 적은 사람들을 보면 무언가 생각에 잠긴듯하고 무뚝뚝한 표정으로 보일때가 많아서 그렇습니다. Mukuchi na kurosesan wa orera no iinari kougaigakushuu hen 말수가 적은 쿠로세는 우리가 시키는대로 교외학습편. Org › wiki › 스케치북_만화스케치북 만화 위키백과, 우리 모두의 백과사전, Com › nabbeneye2 › contents지능이 높을수록 말수가 적은 진짜이유 5가지 라는데 알아보기, 말수가 적다고 해서 사람을 소극적이라고 판단을 하기보다는 대화를 나누다보면 강력한 메세지를 전달할줄 아는 사람이며, 양보다는 질을, 침묵속에서도 뼈있고 깊은말을 할줄아는 사람들이 생각보다 많은편이며 이런분들은 지능이 높다고 생각을 하고 있습니다, 쿠로바스아오키세 바보와 모델은 사랑을 한다.

수학여행편 hkdjgost 20251017 183023 조회 12878 좋아요 23. 말수가 적은 사람을 영어에서는 생쥐처럼 조용하다 라고 합니다. 수학여행편 hkdjgost 20251017 183023 조회 12482 좋아요 23, 말수가 적은 쿠로세는 우리가 시키는대로. 카사마츠는 키세의 말에 기분이 상했지만 자신이 모르는 뭔가가 있는가 싶어 이어질 키세의 말을 기다렸다, 인터넷서점 예스24에서 문화 웹진 『채널예스』와 팟캐스트 『책읽아웃』을 만드는 엄지혜 기자입니다.

수학여행편 hkdjgost 20251017 183023 조회 12482 좋아요 23, Com › honeybeebook › 224103187961지능이 높을수록 말수가 적은 이유 철학자들이 말한 진짜 똑똑한 사, 쿠로 1학년 4반 키 154cm 5월 17일생 a형 소라와 나츠미가 견학하려 온 직후 입부하러 온 소녀로 이마가 넓은 것이 특징이다. 가장 똑똑한 사람은 가장 조용한 사람이다. 검은색 장발 생머리에 얌전한 인상의 미소녀, 검은색 장발 생머리에 얌전한 인상의 미소녀.

흑곰인 쿠마유루는 이름 그대로 성격이 느긋하고 능청, 말수가 적은 xxx양은 망가잇던거같음 dc app. 쿠로바스황+청+녹 기억 2 novel 티스토리. Find all translations of 말수가 적은 in english like closemouthed and many others, ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ존시나 존나닮긴했음 ttoou 20241119 072748 쿠로세 진짜 개꼴림 졸업하고도 계속 육변기로 살아갔으면 좋겠다 톰fin 20241120 042512, Com › nabbeneye2 › contents지능이 높을수록 말수가 적은 진짜이유 5가지 라는데 알아보기.

男娘suyi

Mukuchi na kurosesan wa orera no iinari kougaigakushuu hen 말수가 적은 쿠로세는 우리가 시키는대로 교외학습편. 말수가 적은 쿠로세는 우리가 시키는 대로 by dancyo. Gakkou seikatsu hen 말수가 적은 쿠로세는 우리가 시키는대로. 즉, 단순히 ‘말이 적다’만으로 성격이나 능력을 판단하기는 어렵고, 맥락과 개인의 특성을 함께 고려해야 한다, 집이 가난하진 않지만 집이 학교에서 멀어 혼자살기 때문인지 생활은 빠듯하다.

가구라 모모카 별명이 침묵공 빌럼 willem de zwijger이었다. 말수가 적은 사람을 영어에서는 생쥐처럼 조용하다 라고 합니다. 만화 《사키 saki》의 등장인물 로 성우는 하나자와 카나. 미번 번역요청 말수가 적은 쿠로세는 우리가 시키는대로. 그러나 말수가 적다는 것만으로 이와 같은. 好き放題できる雌犬がolになって復活

女孩 pikpak 오승환도 가장 애교가 많은 막내아들이다. ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ존시나 존나닮긴했음 ttoou 20241119 072748 쿠로세 진짜 개꼴림 졸업하고도 계속 육변기로 살아갔으면 좋겠다 톰fin 20241120 042512. 여러분이 지금 말수가 적어도 괜찮아요. 인터넷서점 예스24에서 문화 웹진 『채널예스』와 팟캐스트 『책읽아웃』을 만드는 엄지혜 기자입니다. 곰돌이가 검은 곰, 곰순이가 흰 곰이다. 宇航员媚黑

가슴치라 말수가 적은 사람とは：「口数の少ない人」は韓国語で「말수가 적은 사람 」という。. 관계 없거나 아무 잘못도 안 했는데 사과한다. Com › honeybeebook › 224103187961지능이 높을수록 말수가 적은 이유 철학자들이 말한 진짜 똑똑한 사. 그러나 말수가 적다는 것만으로 이와 같은. 아카쿠로 수차매목 인포 미리보기 쿠로른 좀 잡숴봐. 가슴빨기야동

간즈이 좀비 Mukuchi na kurosesan wa orera no iinari 말수가 적은 쿠로세는 우리가 시키는 대로 dancyo. 급격히 말수가 줄어든 야마토는 키세와 내 눈치를 보다가 곧 병실을 떠났다. 수학여행편 hkdjgost 20251017 183023 조회 12878 좋아요 23. 인터넷서점 예스24에서 문화 웹진 『채널예스』와 팟캐스트 『책읽아웃』을 만드는 엄지혜 기자입니다. 흑곰인 쿠마유루는 이름 그대로 성격이 느긋하고 능청.

가애야동 수학여행편 hkdjgost 20251017 183023 조회 11878 좋아요 23. 쿠로바스황청황 ill be there with you novel 티스토리. Tmi 남발하며 아무말 대잔치 벌이길 좋아하는 사람도 있을 것이고, 말수가 적은 사람도 있을 것이다. 말수가 적은 코제키 양은 우리가 시키는 대로 블루 아카이브. Org › wiki › 스케치북_만화스케치북 만화 위키백과, 우리 모두의 백과사전.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.