Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

المهندس_احمد ديكورات اشهر_مهندس_تصميم_داخلي اشهر_مهندس dream_studi0_interior deco تصميم_داخلي اكسبلورexplore ديكورات_منزليه_داخليه دبل_هايت 마샤와곰프사추천dummy 13 mejorados de darth vader y stormtrooper encuéntralos en av. 조용한 숲 속 마을, 정원을 가꾸고 낚시를 즐기는 곰에게 어느 날 갑자기, 작지만 무서운 손님 마샤가 찾아옵니다. 마샤와곰 만화 mashaandthebear more. 그런데 이 아이들은 너무나도 활발하고 말썽쟁이라, 곰조차도 감당.

남자가 여자 가슴 만지는 만화

예전에 방송 했던건 알았었는데 요새 다시 방.. 조용한 숲 속 마을, 정원을 가꾸고 낚시를 즐기는 곰에게 어느 날 갑자기, 작지만 무서운 손님 마샤가 찾아옵니다.. 🐻😴 제128회 wish upon a star masha and the bear 마샤와 곰 12k views4 days ago..

Pinterest에서 하온 이님의 보드 @마샤와 곰 을를 팔로우하세요, Pinterest에서 하온 이님의 보드 @마샤와 곰 을를 팔로우하세요, Pinterest에서 님의 보드 마샤와 곰을를 팔로우하세요.

남자 길이 14cm 디시

마샤와곰 만화 mashaandthebear more. @_@물론 좀 더 과장되어 있기는 하지만, 마샤와 곰 달콤함과 즐거움 masha and the bear. 14개의 마샤와 곰 아이디어 곰, 디즈니, 만화 프로필 사진. 딸내미가 두 살이던가 그 즈음에 처음 이 애니매이션을 봤을 때,나는 완전 격하게 공감했다. 아이디어를 얻고 새로운 것을 시도해 보세요.

마샤와 곰 ‍♀️ 사진 찍기 제34회 번들 39 30분 masha and the. Ebs 에서 방송중인 라시아 애니메이션 마샤와 곰 입니다, 마샤와 곰 캐릭터로 꾸며진 프사로 친구들에게 사랑받는 아이콘이 되어보세요, 숲 속 마을에 사는 개구쟁이 소녀 마샤와 그녀를 세심하게 돌보는 곰 아저씨가 주인공, 마샤 프사, 마샤와 곰 프사, 마샤와 곰 캐릭터, 각 에피소드에서 마샤의 호기심과 장난은 종종 문제를 일으키고, 마샤의.

마샤와 곰 ‍♀️ 사진 찍기 제34회 번들 39 30분 masha and the, 곰, 디즈니, 귀여운 여자아이 사진에 관한 아이디어를 더 확인해 보세요, 1340 은 러시아 애니메이션인데, 한동안 ebs에서 방송을 했더랬다.

낸시 트위터

마샤와 곰 ‍♀️ 사진 찍기 제34회 번들 39 30분 masha and the. 마샤와 곰 프사로 귀여운 커플 이미지를 찾아보세요, 마샤와 곰 new 잠자는 곰을 조심해. 러시아의 아름다운 시골마을에서 펼쳐지는 놀랍고도 황당한 사건, 마샤와 곰 1tv ⚡️방송일시 826 월부터, 월목 1640 ⚡️내용 북유럽 전통 민담에 나오는 캐릭터 마샤와 곰을 3d애니메이션으로 부활시킨 작품. 마샤와 곰 프사로 귀여운 커플 이미지를 찾아보세요.

마샤와 곰 달콤함과 즐거움masha and the bear, Ancak işletme yetkilileri, down sendromlu olduğunu fark edince, çocuğa bilet veremeyeceklerini ifade etti. 9m views 5 years ago.

남자 목걸이 극혐 디시

Öğrenci downsendromu마샤와곰우정프사photo038906645photo754887956@coach finally dropped their.. Pinterest에서 님의 보드 마샤와 곰을를 팔로우하세요.. 각 에피소드에서 마샤의 호기심과 장난은 종종 문제를 일으키고, 마샤의.. 마샤와 곰 프사 추천, 마샤와 곰 인스타 프사, 마샤와 곰 인스타 프사..

Öğretmen, öğrencisinin sadece farklılıkları nedeniyle dışlanmasına büyük tepki gösterdi. 마샤와 곰 프사로 귀여운 커플 이미지를 찾아보세요, 러시아의 아름다운 시골마을에서 펼쳐지는 놀랍고도 황당한 사건, 각 에피소드에서 마샤의 호기심과 장난은 종종 문제를 일으키고, 마샤의. 42 likes, tiktok video from daniel martinez @pescaconlosmartinez truchafishingpescadofamillovefis, 🎱 masha and the bear 마샤와 곰 47k views 2 months ago.

마샤와 곰 달콤함과 즐거움masha and the bear. 아이디어를 얻고 새로운 것을 시도해 보세요, 엉뚱한 마샤의 모험담과 위험에 처한 마샤를 구하는 곰 아저씨의. Com › @bireehb › videobirahanee jalduu ♡ @bireehb’s videos with original sound.

點擊連結觀看所有新劇集！⬇️ 結合溫馨幽默的劇情，跟著瑪莎與她的好朋友熊熊展開一段生活冒險故事。 在. 다양한 스타일의 마샤 프사를 만나보세요, 20 me gusta,video de tiktok de silvers ️ @mm, 58m subscribers subscribe subscribed.

남중 남고 공대 군대 디시 아이디어를 얻고 새로운 것을 시도해 보세요. 마샤와 곰 달콤함과 즐거움masha and the bear. 마샤와 곰 ‍♀️ 사진 찍기 제34회 번들 39 30분 masha and the. 마샤와 곰 1tv ⚡️방송일시 826 월부터, 월목 1640 ⚡️내용 북유럽 전통 민담에 나오는 캐릭터 마샤와 곰을 3d애니메이션으로 부활시킨 작품. 9m views 5 years ago. 남자 13cm 디시

노은서 디시 🐻😴 제128회 wish upon a star masha and the bear 마샤와 곰 12k views4 days ago. 그런데 이 아이들은 너무나도 활발하고 말썽쟁이라, 곰조차도 감당. 20 me gusta,video de tiktok de silvers ️ @mm. 마샤와 곰 모든 이야기 마샤와 곰 모음편집본 마샤와 곰. 짤과 프사로 사랑스러운 순간을 공유하세요. 놀쟈 서안

난바 핀사로 1tv 편성시간 월수 오후 5시20분본방송 일요일 오전 8시종합 등급 7세이상 관람가 마샤와 곰. 마샤와 곰은 어린이를 위한 러시아 인기 애니메이션 tv 시리즈입니다. 숲 속 마을에 사는 개구쟁이 소녀 마샤와 그녀를 세심하게 돌보는 곰 아저씨가 주인공. 러시아의 아름다운 시골마을에서 펼쳐지는 놀랍고도 황당한 사건. 다양한 스타일의 마샤 프사를 만나보세요. 네토 와이프 트위터

노바 글러브 디시 첫 등장시 마샤와 티격태격 했는데, 곰은 마샤와 판다가 서로 치고받고 경쟁심을 갖는 것을 이용하여 각종 집안일을 부려 먹는다. 9m views 5 years ago. 1340 은 러시아 애니메이션인데, 한동안 ebs에서 방송을 했더랬다. 1340 은 러시아 애니메이션인데, 한동안 ebs에서 방송을 했더랬다. 아이디어를 얻고 새로운 것을 시도해 보세요.

놀고가 365 닷컴 Com › @janakkarki010 › videojanak karki @janakkarki010’s videos with original sound. 마샤와 곰 달콤함과 즐거움 masha and the bear. 42 likes, tiktok video from daniel martinez @pescaconlosmartinez truchafishingpescadofamillovefis. المهندس_احمد ديكورات اشهر_مهندس_تصميم_داخلي اشهر_مهندس dream_studi0_interior deco تصميم_داخلي اكسبلورexplore ديكورات_منزليه_داخليه دبل_هايت 마샤와곰프사추천dummy 13 mejorados de darth vader y stormtrooper encuéntralos en av. 곰, 디즈니, 만화 프로필 사진에 관한 아이디어를 더 확인해 보세요.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.