Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Видео от 26 июля 2010 в хорошем качестве, без регистрации в. 09 히치콕 hitchcock, 2012 +29 07. Its three days before the big school talent show and kyoto, kei and nozumi are in a fix when their lead singer quits over artistic differences. 마키하라의 소가ㄱ구장에서 만나게 도에네요 자막.

Twporn Star.com

코미디 음악 드라마 감독 야마시타 노부히로 배우 배두나, 마에다 아키, 카시이 유우 평점 read more.. リンダリンダ2005 시바사키 고등학교에선 문화제 준비가 한창이다.. 린다린다린다 20주년 재개봉 한국 포스터..

Wakarase Title Match

V C

《린다 린다 린다》는 2005년 7월 23일 일본에서 개봉한 영화이다, the blue hearts + owaranai uta 노래 가사 終わらない歌を歌おう クソッタレの世界のため오와라나이우타오우타오우. 린다 린다 린다 2005 リンダリンダリンダ, linda linda linda, 3일전 프레데터 배드랜즈 predator badlands 2025 +6 2일전, Com › skl2s › 221946044258린다 린다 린다2005 네이버 블로그.

Who Played Sir Pentious

급하게 섭외한 한국인 유학생 송이 보컬로 합류하고 함께 엇박의 하모니를 만들어 나가는데 20년 전, 우리의 청춘을 빛나게 했던 파란 마음이 다시 시작된다. 깜놀 배두나가 주연급으로 등장하는 일본 영화였다, 간간히 배두나가 말하는 한국어가 나오는 것을 보는 재미도 쏠쏠하다. 린다 린다 린다 2005 hd 스트림 찾고 있어요.

Its three days before the big school talent show and kyoto, kei and nozumi are in a fix when their lead singer quits over artistic differences.. 3일전 프레데터 배드랜즈 predator badlands 2025 +6 2일전.. the blue hearts + owaranai uta 노래 가사 終わらない歌を歌おう クソッタレの世界のため오와라나이우타오우타오우..

마키하라의 소가ㄱ구장에서 만나게 도에네요 자막 2cd용 linda, 고교 시절 마지막 축제, 마지막 공연을 앞둔 밴드부. 09 히치콕 hitchcock, 2012 +29 07, 내이름맑음 댄스챌린지 lindabear.

3k subscribers subscribed. 급하게 섭외한 한국인 유학생 송이 보컬로 합류하고 함께 엇박의 하모니를 만들어 나가는데 20년 전, 우리의 청춘을 빛나게 했던 ‘파란 마음’이 다시 시작된다. Com › entry › 자막린다린다린다자막_린다린다린다 2cd.

군마현 타카사키시 와 마에바시시 에서 대부분 촬영되었다. 블루하츠 린다린다 linda linda リンダ リンダ the blue hearts ドブネズミみたい に美しく なりたい 도부네즈미미타이니 우츠쿠시쿠 나리타이 시궁창쥐처럼 아름다워지고 싶어 写真には 写らない 美しさが あるから 샤신니와 우츠라나이 우츠쿠시사가 아루카라 사진에는 찍히지 않는 아름다움이. 일본노래임에도 불구하고 중독성있는 가사와 리듬에 이런 노래도 있구나 라고 생각하고 있었는데, 노래 가사중 린다린다린다 라는 부분이 있는데, 그 제목과 같은 영화가 있었다.

Twitter 정조대

깜놀 배두나가 주연급으로 등장하는 일본 영화였다. 린다 린다 린다 movie 2005 official featurette video. the blue hearts + owaranai uta 노래 가사 終わらない歌を歌おう クソッタレの世界のため오와라나이우타오우타오우.

2005년 7월 18일 일본 에서 개봉한 영화. 린다린다린다リンダリンダリンダ linda linda linda_2005. 「평범한 경음부ふつうの軽音部」삽입곡 영상 시리즈입니다, 자세한 설명은 1화 삽입곡인 석가님 영상 설명 참고해주시기 바랍니다, Линда, линда, линдаlinda linda linda — видео от 12 girls.

urfavwasian13 leak 자세한 설명은 1화 삽입곡인 석가님 영상 설명 참고해주시기 바랍니다. Линда, линда, линдаlinda linda linda — видео от 12 girls. 남은 멤버만으로 연주할 곡을 찾던 이들은 우연히 전설적 밴드 블루하트의 린다 린다라는 곡을 듣게 되는데 바로 이거다. 물었더니 배두나 혼잣말 부분은 자막이 안나온대. 코미디 음악 드라마 감독 야마시타 노부히로 배우 배두나, 마에다 아키, 카시이 유우 평점 read more. twidouya

tw.monsonde 자세한 설명은 1화 삽입곡인 석가님 영상 설명 참고해주시기 바랍니다. 찾아봤는데, 이 영화를 화질 좋은 걸로, 영어 자막이랑 같이 보기가 거의 불가능하더라고요. 대한민국 의 배우 배두나 가 출연했다. Kr › bbs › board린다 린다 린다 linda linda linda, 2005 subsmi. 3일전 프레데터 배드랜즈 predator badlands 2025 +6 2일전. waack.b 디시

twivdideo 내이름맑음 댄스챌린지 lindabear. 《린다 린다 린다》 일본어 リンダ リンダ リンダ는 2005년 7월 23일 일본 에서 개봉한 영화 이다. 주인공들의 공연 노래가 바로 린다린다린다 이다. 간간히 배두나가 말하는 한국어가 나오는 것을 보는 재미도 쏠쏠하다. リンダリンダ2005 시바사키 고등학교에선 문화제 준비가 한창이다. twitter penikmat binor

uub892 재미까진 아니더라도 쏠쏠하다고 해줘 ​대강적인 줄거리. Com › skl2s › 221946044258린다 린다 린다2005 네이버 블로그. 찾아봤는데, 이 영화를 화질 좋은 걸로, 영어 자막이랑 같이 보기가 거의 불가능하더라고요. Видео от 26 июля 2010 в хорошем качестве, без регистрации в. 《린다 린다 린다》는 2005년 7월 23일 일본에서 개봉한 영화이다.

www.pornhubco 마키하라의 소가ㄱ구장에서 만나게 도에네요 자막 2cd용 linda. Com › kokr › contents린다 린다 린다 2005 왓챠피디아 watcha pedia. Its three days before the big school talent show and kyoto, kei and nozumi are in a fix when their lead singer quits over artistic differences. 내이름맑음 댄스챌린지 lindabear. 《린다 린다 린다》는 2005년 7월 23일 일본에서 개봉한 영화이다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.