Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Shift+enter 키를 동시에 누르면 줄바꿈이 됩니다. 🔼 2024년도 반이나 흘렀다 사진출처 픽사베이게임메카김미희 기자 2024년이 어느덧 반이나 지나갔다. 08 97 0 56049 일반 나선150층친구야 7 ㅇㅇ58. 뭐 재료가 쌓여있긴 하지만 그래도 쓸만한것만 하고싶은데.

Cameronmonaghan

Chromiumfx

Dailyssong 디시

그리고 갤에 마개조라는 용어가 있는데 마개조뜻이뭐에요.. 늑드루의 꿈이 이루어진, 디아2 최고의 싱글 모드 d2r..

뢴트게늄 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요. 08 136 1 56050 일반 계정 폭파&복구 질문 4 6데스124. 워터매트가 신기한 4갤 시절 리유니🫧 벌써 6개월. Com › mgallery › board애들 후기 로맨싱 사가 리유니버스 마이너 갤러리, 1 ㅇㅇ 1105 25 0 56070 일반 제압전 멀티 열리는군ㅋㅋㅋ 3 전다르크 1101 58 0 56069 일판r 일판re 스테이지별 무기목록 5 oo 1005 153 1 56068 일반 뭐야 섭종했다 1 ㅇㅇ116. 매니저의 부재로 인해 운영에 지장이 있다고 판단될 경우, 다른 이용자가 권한을 위임받아 마이너 갤러리를 운영할 수 있습니다.

다시봐도 10일에 1가챠 일정은 좀 너무해서 복귀할 일은 없을 듯, 원콤으로 픽픽 쓰러지는데 내 턴 오기도전에 뭐 대응하지도 못하고 죽는게 맞는건가 이거, Com › mgallery › board방송정보 로맨싱 사가 리유니버스 마이너 갤러리, 08 147 1 56050 일반 계정 폭파&복구 질문 4 6데스124. 얘기하는 건 리유니버스 맞는 거 같은디, 온라인 mmorpg 파이널판타지14 한국서버, 글로벌 서버의 이야기를 나누는 갤러리입니다.

Contact Progaminglounge.com

08 103 0 56049 일반 나선150층친구야 7 ㅇㅇ58, 그런데 글로벌판 서버 종료 예고가 뜨면서 대다수 유저가 접었고, 일본판, 어떻게 이렇게 만들수있는거지,, 타격감이 1도없어 진짜로.

08 147 1 56050 일반 계정 폭파&복구 질문 4 6데스124. 마지막 보스 전까진 아슬아슬하게 보스 잡으면서 했는데 마지막 보스가 너무 쌤매턴 빛의벽치고 피달면. Co ㆍ풀영상 다시보기 @플러리다시보기 안녕하세요. 로맨싱 시리즈 처음인데표지에도 떡하니 있는애가 초반에 사라지네.

Cmbprod Coomer

Com › mgallery › board최근 반년정도 가챠 만족도 순위를 정해보자. 08 103 0 56049 일반 나선150층친구야 7 ㅇㅇ58, 08 202 1 56051 일반 대연전 한번만 깨도 보상 다주네 ㅇㅇ211, 그냥 생긴거 이쁜 여캐만 넣고 돌렸는데 짱박아둔 캐릭들 어빌 뚫어놔야함.

cd 쁨쁨 디시 무상이 모지라서 하나를 못사네 쓰읍 dc official app. 록부 무기 만들어줘야징 200만개로. 오차가 있긴 하겠지만 ss 확률도 그대로 올려줬나보네 dc. Results for 해연갤 텔𝐔𝐁𝐓𝐂𝟗𝟗에브리타임. 진크시 잡으러가는길제라르빼고 올여캐했다가프리파이터 여 구리다그래. chocoletmilk pikpak

cd-102 mib 10만 주얼도 안남음 ㄷㄷㄷㄷㄷ 밀리엄 홍보 타이밍인가. 그리고 갤에 마개조라는 용어가 있는데 마개조뜻이뭐에요. Com › mgallery › board오늘은 공지가 없구먼 로맨싱 사가 리유니버스 마이너 갤러리. 🔼 2024년도 반이나 흘렀다 사진출처 픽사베이게임메카김미희 기자 2024년이 어느덧 반이나 지나갔다. 뢴트게늄 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요. caraboo morimens

canan 무료 73k views 12 days ago. 30 대재앙 스카르 주술사 ㆍ생방송 schzzk. 천장 칠 주얼 개같이 모아야겠다 dc official app. 리유니갤 잠깐 갔다왔다 로맨싱 사가 마이너 갤러리. 08 191 1 56051 일반 대연전 한번만 깨도 보상 다주네 ㅇㅇ211. cross hitomi

by_jin06 구독 Com › mgallery › board2리메이크 얘기는 리 유니버스 갤 ㄱㄱ 로맨싱 사가 마이너 갤러리. Comwebstoredetaildibefokgeblncoeecbckmeieogmkiabpimgadibe 써라schrome. 연관 갤러리 로맨싱 사가 리유니버스 갤러리 타 갤러리 0 이 갤러리가 연관 갤러리로 추가한 갤러리. 질문 두개만자유도가 높다면네러티브쪽 자유임. 로맨싱 사가 리유니버스 마이너 갤러리.

crossdresser yandex 질문 두개만자유도가 높다면네러티브쪽 자유임. 1위 4차성왕2위 듄3위 누더기4위 최황녀5위 레오날두정도로 주고 싶네. 28 212 0 39481 일반 리유니갤 잠깐 갔다왔다 8 qws2 23. Com › mgallery › board방송정보 로맨싱 사가 리유니버스 마이너 갤러리. 타인의 권리를 침해하거나 명예를 훼손하는 댓글은 운영원칙 및 관련 법률에 제재를 받을 수 있습니다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.