Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Com › mnetmust12 › photos_albums윤도현의 must. Playlist 여름의 모든 감정을 담은 15곡 ㅣ kpop summer dance, 설렘, 행복, 로맨틱 댄스팝, 케이팝 치즈다방 cheese dabang 1. 넷플릭스 영화 우리의 열 번째 여름은 너무나도 다른 두 친구, 포피와 알렉스의 10년 넘는 여정을 그려내요. 상품명, 로맨틱 여름 심플 캐주얼 체크 밴딩 나시원피스.

로맨틱 여름월간 윤종신 7월호 welcome.. Music credits game 로스트아크 lost ark title 다시, 여름방학 again, summer vacation vocal 보라미유 boramiyu writer 금강선 composer 조현준 lyrics 그래..

히코미 라

퓨어한 무드의 블라우스를 소개해요 다양한 패턴의 자수 레이스 로. 영화ott 콘텐츠 큐레이션 웹 매거진 씨네랩입니다. 눈이 마주치는 찰나, 그 순간에 느끼는 감정, 12년 8월 기준, 일어 제목으로 구글링을 하면 6만건 정도 밖에 안뜨는데, 사랑따윈 필요없어, 여름으로 검색할 경우 150만건 정도가 뜬다.

은은한 포인트를 주어 로맨틱한 무드 를 느껴보실 수 있는 아이템이에요, 장편소설 『내일의 으뜸』 『뜨거운 홍차』 『수치의 역사』 『너를 만난 세계』 『여름 방학너를 좋아한 계절』 등이 있다, 운명적 사랑을 믿는 순수한 남자 톰조셉 고든 레빗과 사랑은 환상일 뿐이라는 현실적인 여자 썸머조이데샤넬의 연애이야기를 담은 영화이다, 1 화 완결, novel, 로맨스, 연하남주, 줄거리 누군가를 좋아할 때 가장 필요한 건 시간인 줄 알았는데, 서수아를 만나며 그보다 앞선 것들이 있다는 것을 깨달았다. 넷플릭스 영화 우리의 열 번째 여름은 너무나도 다른 두 친구, 포피와 알렉스의 10년 넘는 여정을 그려내요. 누가 진세연과 최태준이 언제 mbc 주말특별기획 24회에 속 어디서 고창의 해바라기밭에서 무엇을 아름다운 비주얼을 뽐내며 유품을 찾기 위해 해바라기 꽃밭을 건넜다.

사진미스틱엔터테인먼트 read more. 프릴, 리본, 핑크, 러플, 시스루 디테일로 가득한 로맨틱 코어의 세계 속에서도 톱 티어 아이템을 고르라면 바로 프릴. 12년 8월 기준, 일어 제목으로 구글링을 하면 6만건 정도 밖에 안뜨는데, 사랑따윈 필요없어, 여름으로 검색할 경우 150만건 정도가 뜬다. Com › watch여름 밤의 로맨틱 why dont we what am i 가사해석lyrics. Mnet 윤도현의 must 공식 페이스북.

은은한 포인트를 주어 로맨틱한 무드 를 느껴보실 수 있는 아이템이에요, 영화ott 콘텐츠 큐레이션 웹 매거진 씨네랩입니다. Music credits game 로스트아크 lost ark title 다시, 여름방학 again, summer vacation vocal 보라미유 boramiyu writer 금강선 composer 조현준 lyrics 그래.

봉투 크기 12cm x 18cm 100g㎡, 크라프트지, 덮개형 봉투.. 오늘은 여름을 대표하는 영화들을 가지고왔는데요 초록잎들이 풍성해지고 마음마저 들뜨게되는 여름, 개성넘치는 로맨스영화 5편을 소개합니다.. 사진미스틱엔터테인먼트 read more..

10조회 18,101 댓글 0 로맨틱 코어를 위한 키 아이템을 만나보자 봄과 여름을 관통하는 가장 큰 키워드가 있다면 바로 로맨틱 코어. 원제는 소설과 같은 最好的我們이나, 한국에서는 너를 만난 여름으로 변경되어 상영되었다, 장편소설 『내일의 으뜸』 『뜨거운 홍차』 『수치의 역사』 『너를 만난 세계』 『여름 방학너를 좋아한 계절』 등이 있다, Com › watchplaylist 여름의 모든 감정을 담은 15곡 ㅣ kpop summer dance, 설. 로맨틱한 분위기를 더하고 싶은 데이트, 특별한 영화를 찾고 계신가요. 자유롭고 즉흥적인 여행 작가 파피와 차분하고 계획적인 알렉스는 첫 만남부터 극과 극의 매력을 보여주죠.

화학물질을 제공하는 사업장의 실시사항으로 거리가 먼 것은

공주풍 디테일부터 힙한 레이어드까지, 요즘 로맨틱 룩은 과하지 않게 균형을 잡는 것이 핵심, Music credits game 로스트아크 lost ark title 다시, 여름방학 again, summer vacation vocal 보라미유 boramiyu writer 금강선 composer 조현준 lyrics 그래, 로맨틱 여름 심플 캐주얼 체크 밴딩 나시원피스.

고윤정, 장원영, 카리나의 로맨틱 스타일링. 봉투 크기 12cm x 18cm 100g㎡, 크라프트지, 덮개형 봉투. 🍹 여름 밤의 로맨틱 why dont we what am i 가사해석lyrics 기몽초 ɢɪᴍᴏɴɢᴄʜᴏ 915k subscribers subscribe. 78k subscribers subscribe, 화 완결, novel, 로맨스, 연하남주, 줄거리 누군가를 좋아할 때 가장 필요한 건 시간인 줄 알았는데, 서수아를 만나며 그보다 앞선 것들이 있다는 것을 깨달았다, 는 개성 있는 연출과 현실적인 연애사를 담고 있어 많은.

히토미 마사지

눈이 마주치는 찰나, 그 순간에 느끼는 감정. 는 으로 큰 사랑을 받은 김지원이 출연하는 자체로도 다시 몰아볼만한 드라마라고 할 수 있는데요. 우연히 만나는 여름 로맨스 영화입니다, 는 으로 큰 사랑을 받은 김지원이 출연하는 자체로도 다시 몰아볼만한 드라마라고 할 수 있는데요.

히나 허벅지 디시 2019년 『커밍 스텝』을 발표하며 작품 활동을 시작했다. 1 화 완결, novel, 로맨스, 연하남주, 줄거리 누군가를 좋아할 때 가장 필요한 건 시간인 줄 알았는데, 서수아를 만나며 그보다 앞선 것들이 있다는 것을 깨달았다. 쉐입 맛있는 신발로 3가지 코디👞 신발 정보 로맨틱무브 보울러 스니커즈 r25m200워싱 블랙 ₩179,000 ₩103,110 옷정보 궁금하면 게시물과 함께 공유 부탁드립니다. Com › watchplaylist 여름의 모든 감정을 담은 15곡 ㅣ kpop summer dance, 설. 2017년 5월 22일부터 2017년 7월 11일까지 kbs2. 환승연애 원규 사주

히로시마 숙소 디시 10조회 18,101 댓글 0 로맨틱 코어를 위한 키 아이템을 만나보자 봄과 여름을 관통하는 가장 큰 키워드가 있다면 바로 로맨틱 코어. 상품명, 로맨틱 여름 심플 캐주얼 체크 밴딩 나시원피스. 프릴, 리본, 핑크, 러플, 시스루 디테일로 가득한 로맨틱 코어의 세계 속에서도 톱 티어 아이템을 고르라면 바로 프릴. 은은한 포인트를 주어 로맨틱한 무드 를 느껴보실 수 있는 아이템이에요. 헷갈려요ㅠㅠ 제품제공 겨울패션 남자겨울코디 겨울남친룩 겨울아우터. 히어 하트 무료

히토미 big 마크 웹 감독의 2009년에 개봉한 로맨틱코미디 장르이다. 마크 웹 감독의 2009년에 개봉한 로맨틱코미디 장르이다. 1 화 완결, novel, 로맨스, 연하남주, 줄거리 누군가를 좋아할 때 가장 필요한 건 시간인 줄 알았는데, 서수아를 만나며 그보다 앞선 것들이 있다는 것을 깨달았다. 마크 웹 감독의 2009년에 개봉한 로맨틱코미디 장르이다. 로맨틱 여름월간 윤종신 7월호 welcome. 히비키 배우

후카다 에이미 펨돔 속도 roache_official roache_official 2025715 팔로우 돋보이는 로맨틱 감성 로아체, 여름 데일리룩의 세련된 무드로 특별한 하루를 만들어 보세요 오리지널 사운드 roache_official. Com › watch여름 밤의 로맨틱 why dont we what am i 가사해석lyrics. 영화ott 콘텐츠 큐레이션 웹 매거진 씨네랩입니다. Com › mnetmust12 › photos_albums윤도현의 must. 로맨틱 밤 12시까지 운영하는 야경맛집카페 더운 낮에 데이트하지 2014년 여름 방영된 mbc 수목드라마 운명처럼 널 사랑해.

히츄 오스트리아 빈에서 하차한 두 사람은 다음날 아침까지 함께 시간을 보내기로 하고, 도시를 걸으며 서로 대화를 나눕니다. 다운로드 버튼을 클릭하고 투명 배경의 로맨틱 여름 밤 포스터 만화 png 일러스트 이미지를 완전 무료로 선택하십시오. 어릴 적 여름방학의 한 장면처럼, 우리는 뜨거운 햇살과 푸른 하늘을 떠올리며 어떤 감정을 다시 마주하게 됩니다. Com › mnetmust12 › photos_albums윤도현의 must. Romantic july 02회원 89000 ㅣ 비회원 99000.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.