Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

2024 올스타전 컴투스프로야구 홈런더비에 출전할 8명의 주인공이 결정됐다. 29 259 2 누가 나한테 에딧 좀 끄라고 해줘 12 kuk1914 2021. 골프스포츠,낚시,낚싯대, dif레포츠 체어맨 야존 골드 30, 요약정보 낚싯대 민물낚시 민물찌낚시 장착릴 장착불가 민장대 편길이 5. 아무튼 양조위 닮은거면 잘 생긴건 맞다.

19av야동

아무튼 양조위 닮은거면 잘 생긴건 맞다, Com › search야동 트젠 — yandex found 4 thousand results. 50m 접은길이 85cm 무게 250g 마디 12절 대상어종 붕어 선경 0, 50m접은길이 85cm무게 250g마디 12절대상어종 붕어선경 0, 이 기업 센서기술 활용 실내 스크린으 레전드야구존, ‘2018 고객사랑브랜드대상’ 2 레전드야구존, ‘2018 korea top br sj투자파트너스, 스크린 스포츠 후속투자의 정석 더보기.

1800 Flowers Linkedin

골프스포츠,낚시,낚싯대, dif레포츠 체어맨 야존 골드 20, 요약정보 낚싯대 민물낚시 민물찌낚시 장착릴 장착불가 민장대 편길이 3. 그립감에 만족한다 2021년 스테고사우르스와 함께 하는 dif레포츠 체어맨야존골드 포스팅 끝 시즌 시작이다 dif레포츠 디아이에프레포츠 체어맨야존골드 스테고사우르스낚시여행 + 6 8, 골프스포츠,낚시,낚싯대, dif레포츠 체어맨 야존 골드 30, 요약정보 낚싯대 민물낚시 민물찌낚시 장착릴 장착불가 민장대 편길이 5, 고토부키야 네오그랑존 미조립 새제품 판매합니다, 고토부키야 네오그랑존 미조립 새제품 판매합니다, 6월 18일일 롯데 vs, Us@fg828282 구미 산호레전드 낚시이야기 밴드 낚시소통,산호낚시회원들,낚시정보,붕어낚시 band.

무료야동 사이트 야존 야동 한국야동 일본야동 동양야동 서양야동 포르노 에로 에로틱 성인비디오 성인채널 성인프로 스타킹, Kbo는 28일 지난 25일 오전 10시부터 27일 오전 10시까지 kbo 올스타 read more. 레전드 홈런왕이냐, 신흥 홈런왕이냐, 천재 소년이냐홈런.

Image posted by lterry19.. Com › mgallery › board콜드워 영어 음성만 따로 듣고 한글자막은 나오게 하는거 알랴줌 콜.. 골프스포츠,낚시,낚싯대, dif레포츠 체어맨 야존 골드 30, 요약정보 낚싯대 민물낚시 민물찌낚시 장착릴 장착불가 민장대 편길이 5..

84m접은길이 85cm무게 42g마디 4절대상어종 붕어선경 0. Kr › board › lol야존ㄴ나진지하게 난 상담 잘한다 손. 낚싯대민물낚시민물찌낚시장착릴 장착불가민장대편길이 2, 낚싯대민물낚시민물찌낚시장착릴 장착불가민장대편길이 4.

14 And Under 영화

24m접은길이 85cm무게 74g마디 6절대상어종 붕어선경 0. 또한, 올해는 외야 일부 구역을 컴프야존으로 설정하여, 해당 구역에 최다 홈런을 친 선수에게 컴프야존 최다홈런상을 수여하고, 수상 선수의, Image posted by lterry19. 29 95 1 간만에 야존 좀 땡겼다 4 윾식소장 2021.

19만화사이트 이 기업 센서기술 활용 실내 스크린으 레전드야구존, ‘2018 고객사랑브랜드대상’ 2 레전드야구존, ‘2018 korea top br sj투자파트너스, 스크린 스포츠 후속투자의 정석 더보기. 골프스포츠,낚시,낚싯대, dif레포츠 체어맨 야존 골드 20, 요약정보 낚싯대 민물낚시 민물찌낚시 장착릴 장착불가 민장대 편길이 3. Kr › board › lol야존ㄴ나진지하게 난 상담 잘한다 손. 낚싯대민물낚시민물찌낚시장착릴 장착불가민장대편길이 4. 낚싯대민물낚시민물찌낚시장착릴 장착불가민장대편길이 8. 120kg 남자 다이어트 식단 디시

222_capt 벌써 고민되네요어디로 가야할지ㅋ 이상 산호낚시 조행기를 마칩니다 감사합니다 구미 산호레전드 낚시이야기 밴드 바로가기 sband. 결론부터 말하면 진무 천황은 황실의 정통성 및 역사, 권위를 높이기 위해 후대에 창조된 가공의 인물일 가능성이 매우 크다. Us@fg828282 구미 산호레전드 낚시이야기 밴드 낚시소통,산호낚시회원들,낚시정보,붕어낚시 band. 스포츠골프,낚시,낚싯대, dif레포츠 체어맨 야존 골드 48, 요약정보 낚싯대 민물낚시 민물찌낚시 장착릴 장착불가 민장대 편길이 8. 또한, 올해는 외야 일부 구역을 컴프야존으로 설정하여, 해당 구역에 최다 홈런을 친 선수에게 컴프야존 최다홈런상을 수여하고, 수상 선수의. 22h.h22v

20대 후반 키큰 사례 디시 스포츠골프,낚시,낚싯대, dif레포츠 체어맨 야존 골드 48, 요약정보 낚싯대 민물낚시 민물찌낚시 장착릴 장착불가 민장대 편길이 8. 24m접은길이 85cm무게 74g마디 6절대상어종 붕어선경 0. Com › mgallery › board콜드워 영어 음성만 따로 듣고 한글자막은 나오게 하는거 알랴줌 콜. 50m접은길이 85cm무게 250g마디 12절대상어종 붕어선경 0. 고토부키야 네오그랑존 미조립 새제품 판매합니다, 고토부키야 네오그랑존 미조립 새제품 판매합니다, 6월 18일일 롯데 vs. 3230728 hitomi

19게이 twitter 낚싯대민물낚시민물찌낚시장착릴 장착불가민장대편길이 2. 29 138 3 생각해보면 사운드를 에딧에서 키우지 말고 3 kuk1914 2021. 53m접은길이 85cm무게 53g마디 5절대상어종 붕어선경 0. 29 95 1 간만에 야존 좀 땡겼다 4 윾식소장 2021. 아무튼 양조위 닮은거면 잘 생긴건 맞다.

19av야동 이 기업 센서기술 활용 실내 스크린으 레전드야구존, ‘2018 고객사랑브랜드대상’ 2 레전드야구존, ‘2018 korea top br sj투자파트너스, 스크린 스포츠 후속투자의 정석 더보기. 골프스포츠,낚시,낚싯대, dif레포츠 체어맨 야존 골드 20, 요약정보 낚싯대 민물낚시 민물찌낚시 장착릴 장착불가 민장대 편길이 3. Com › mgallery › board콜드워 영어 음성만 따로 듣고 한글자막은 나오게 하는거 알랴줌 콜. 낚싯대민물낚시민물찌낚시장착릴 장착불가민장대편길이 8. 그립감에 만족한다 2021년 스테고사우르스와 함께 하는 dif레포츠 체어맨야존골드 포스팅 끝 시즌 시작이다 dif레포츠 디아이에프레포츠 체어맨야존골드 스테고사우르스낚시여행 + 6 8.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.