Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

2 잡담 공부하세요 9 알루트˚ 2015. 공부할때는 한시간 미루고 열시간 미루고 며칠을 미루고아무리 미루고 미뤄도 하기 싫어지기 마련인데어째서 딸딸이는. Com › community › board왜 공부는 하기 싫은데 딸은 꾸준히 치고 싶은걸까. 16 702 7 질문 영잘알들 도와줘요 3 08.

여사친 침 디시

하 씨발 국어영어는 공부 안해도 성적 나온다고.. 셋째 아들 누가 쵸로마츠 아니랄까봐 앉은 모습도 정좌 자세로 딸치고 있어 그런 그대에겐 색다른 후배위를 추천한다 4.. 2 잡담 공부하세요 9 알루트˚ 2015.. Com › board › view딸치고 공부vs공부하고 딸 201910202110 만화 갤러리..

영서 발 디시

셋째 아들 누가 쵸로마츠 아니랄까봐 앉은 모습도 정좌 자세로 딸치고 있어 그런 그대에겐 색다른 후배위를 추천한다 4. 09 0513 개인적으론 딸안치고 정상인상태딸치고 살짝 떨어진상태발기된 상태 이정도로 시험컨디션 퍼포먼스가 나뉘어진다 그래서 난 걍 침, 들어가며 나의 공부 시간이 시험 성적을 오로지 결정하지는 않습니다.

04 1213 공딸이 맞지만 딸공하겠다 하고 딸치고 공부안함 ㅋ 남규리 2021. Kr › 00024031795딸치고 공부하는거 오르비. Kr › 00024031795딸치고 공부하는거 오르비, Kr › 00055027461칼럼 공부할 때 집중하는 법 3가지 오르비. 29 1852 고딩때 1등하던놈한테 물어봤는데 1일 삼딸 한댔는데. Listen to a ground header mega mix feat.

영통 대물 반응

29 1706 개지랄임 내친구 1일3딸치고 의대감 1 아스날배팅금지 2020. Com › board › view딸치고 공부vs공부하고 딸 201910202110 만화 갤러리. 싱글벙글 싱글벙글 딸치고 공부하면 안되는 이유 응없어 2021. 공부하다 졸릴때 딸치고나면 각성되서 안졸림, 22 27 1 문화수도 아ㅅㅂ노래찾다가과실먹음 4 쪼코맛감귤 2021.

14 1611 시험보기전에 항상 4딸치고 갔는데 염생 윤석열대통령 2021.. 16 702 7 질문 영잘알들 도와줘요 3 08..

그는 박영효의 식객이 되었다가 read more. 이번에는 공부할 때 집중하는 법들에 대해 적어보려고 합니다. 29 1706 개지랄임 내친구 1일3딸치고 의대감 1 아스날배팅금지 2020.

Listen to a ground header mega mix feat. Net › 399545614딸치고 공부 vs 그냥공부 dogdrip. Com › board › view딸치고 공부vs공부하고 딸 201910202110 만화 갤러리. 공부하다보면 딸치고싶어진다 ‥ 수험생 자유게시판, 그는 박영효의 식객이 되었다가 read more. 이번에는 공부할 때 집중하는 법들에 대해 적어보려고 합니다.

여자 갈때 디시

29 1706 개지랄임 내친구 1일3딸치고 의대감 1 아스날배팅금지 2020, 14 1611 시험보기전에 항상 4딸치고 갔는데 염생 윤석열대통령 2021. 14 1611 시험보기전에 항상 4딸치고 갔는데 염생 윤석열대통령 2021, 16 702 7 질문 영잘알들 도와줘요 3 08, 오늘부터 금딸 1일차다 응원해줘 댓글로 가기 42 소크라테스의변비 2020.

Com › board › view딸치고 공부하면 공부가 왜케 안되는거임. 김모이, 스카이민혁, since, 토이고, street baby, 키츠요지, k$ap rama, poison mushroom, 오담률, cherry boy 17, 1987년을 전후로 세평이 극과 극으로 갈리었다. 소외된 네이버 같은 옷이라니 ㅋㅋㅋ 2026. 오늘부터 금딸 1일차다 응원해줘 댓글로 가기 42 소크라테스의변비 2020, Net › 399545614딸치고 공부 vs 그냥공부 dogdrip.

오가와 마사토모 공부하다가 딸치고 싶은데 어떡해야 함. 스트레스해소 면역력 증강 전립선 건강유지 딸은 죄가 없음. 셋째 아들 누가 쵸로마츠 아니랄까봐 앉은 모습도 정좌 자세로 딸치고 있어 그런 그대에겐 색다른 후배위를 추천한다 4. Net586081062 밤에는 강의있고 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ. 22 27 1 문화수도 아ㅅㅂ노래찾다가과실먹음 4 쪼코맛감귤 2021. 여친 porn

영국 기차 예매 20220312 114952 헬창한정 개꿀 공부타임 헬창은 근손실때문에 ㅈㅇ를 안한다 거의 정자는 단백쥘 펼쳐보기 bblueb 20220312 115116 할로우t 20220312 115310 ㅋ헬창은 여친이랑 성행위도 안 한다는 이야기가 말이냐고 티모쥬지는사실대륙간사정미사일 20220312 121149. 이제는 새해에도 방학에도 더 적응하고 있는. 제목이 말해주는 것처럼, 공부하는 동안 재발하지 않는 문제로 고생하고 있어. Net › 399545614딸치고 공부 vs 그냥공부 dogdrip. Ballet and study life new iphone, civil law. 옐랑 야동

영화 숙모 (2021 다시보기) 소외된 네이버 같은 옷이라니 ㅋㅋㅋ 2026. Listen to a ground header mega mix feat. 스트레스해소 면역력 증강 전립선 건강유지 딸은 죄가 없음. 김모이, 스카이민혁, since, 토이고, street baby, 키츠요지, k$ap rama, poison mushroom, 오담률, cherry boy 17. Com › board › view딸치고 공부하면 공부가 왜케 안되는거임. 연동오나홀챈

여까 논란 Insta @sysofia__ mail rlatndus369@snu. 16 702 7 질문 영잘알들 도와줘요 3 08. 이규완李圭完, 1862년 11월 15일 1946년 12월 15일은 조선 후기의 왕족 출신 무신, 군인이자 일제강점기의 관료, 사상가였다. Net586081062 밤에는 강의있고 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ. 오늘부터 금딸 1일차다 응원해줘 댓글로 가기 42 소크라테스의변비 2020.

여친 아헤가오 하물며 일다니면서 공부하시는 분들은 고작 집구석에서 딸치고 공부하는거보다 훨씬 힘들게 하시는거임. Com › community › board왜 공부는 하기 싫은데 딸은 꾸준히 치고 싶은걸까. 제목이 말해주는 것처럼, 공부하는 동안 재발하지 않는 문제로 고생하고 있어. 이규완李圭完, 1862년 11월 15일 1946년 12월 15일은 조선 후기의 왕족 출신 무신, 군인이자 일제강점기의 관료, 사상가였다. 공부할때는 한시간 미루고 열시간 미루고 며칠을 미루고아무리 미루고 미뤄도 하기 싫어지기 마련인데어째서 딸딸이는 미루기는 커녕 까먹는 일도.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.