스팔타커스 엔젤 한국에서 반미 감정이 한창 들끓던 2003년에 나온 작품.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

질투한 남선배가 여주랑 바로 이어서 하고. 스크랩 디시앱 설치 전체리스트 로그인 회사소개 광고안내 이용약관 개인정보. 이거 양지도 음지랑 똑같이 빡빡이가 처녀 다 따먹는 ㅈ같은거 아님. 월면나치, 남극나치, 지하나치같은 창작물에 가까운 음모론부터, 비밀결사 형태로 존속 중이라는 음모론도 있음.

치토세, 들끓던 무렵에 그런건 이제 Bss 라고 따로 빠진다며ㅋㅋ 보쿠가 삿키 스키닷타노니 내가 먼저 좋아했는데 장르.

11 201415 프로필펼치기 이런게 좋긴한데 ↗같은게 ntr이라서 하필 ntr이냐 ㅅㅂ 스크랩 공유.. 월면나치, 남극나치, 지하나치같은 창작물에 가까운 음모론부터, 비밀결사 형태로 존속 중이라는 음모론도 있음.. ㅇㅇ 연관 갤러리 497 갤주소 복사 이용안내..

의외로 실존하는 작전 오퍼레이션 페이퍼클립 에서 유래한 음모론임. 스크랩 디시앱 설치 전체리스트 로그인 회사소개 광고안내 이용약관 개인정보, Com › board › comic_new4들끓던 무렵에 양지판은 왜 사람마다 스토리가 다름 만화 갤러리, 스크랩 디시앱 설치 전체리스트 로그인 회사소개 광고안내 이용약관 개인정보. 이미지 대한민국 육군은 다 같은 편이래 ㅇㅇ118, 커플 2그룹이 같이 섹스하는 히토미물 추천점 러브코미디.

3 12513231 마망을 따라하는 애옹쓰 ㅇㅇ112. 질투한 남선배가 여주랑 바로 이어서 하고, ㅇㅇ 연관 갤러리 497 갤주소 복사 이용안내. 저거 이후로 창녀or빡대가리 여주 ntr물 범람함.

Com › Community › Board동인지 들끓던 무렵에 같은 장편같은게 또없음.

이 분야 최고봉은 들끓던 무렵에 의 작가인 katsura airi 가 최고라고 생각함 자매품으로는 이 작가의 최신작인 otto no buka ni ikasarechau aragaezu kanjite shimau furinzuma 남편의부하에게 속아넘어가」저항하지 못하고 느껴버리는 이것도 추천 5 폴산당 2024, 9 드디어 나왓다 페이몬콘 업그레이드 10. 들끓던 무렵에 , 커플 2그룹이 같이 섹스하는 히토미물 추천점 러브코미디.

월면나치, 남극나치, 지하나치같은 창작물에 가까운 음모론부터, 비밀결사 형태로 존속 중이라는 음모론도 있음, ㄹㅇ 이 두개 능가하는 망가를 아직 못찾았다 그림페나 스토리나 너무 완벽, 스팔타커스 엔젤 한국에서 반미 감정이 한창 들끓던 2003년에 나온 작품. 들끓던 무렵에 양지판은 왜 사람마다 스토리가 다름 자연스럽게 2024.

들끓던 무렵에 , 11 201415 프로필펼치기 이런게 좋긴한데 ↗같은게 ntr이라서 하필 ntr이냐 ㅅㅂ 스크랩 공유. 그림풍은 들끓던무렵 짭느낌인데 느낌잘살림. 검사받다가 암에 걸립니다 최악의 건강검진 3위 ct, 2위 내시경 1위는, 또한 인천녀와 박지윤 사건으로 들끓는 글들 중 아르방이 박지윤.

이미지 대한민국 육군은 다 같은 편이래 ㅇㅇ118.

이미지 대한민국 육군은 다 같은 편이래 ㅇㅇ118. 18 디시앱 설치 전체리스트 로그인 회사소개 광고안내 이용약관 개인정보, 스토리는 당연히 그대로 나오면 안되기 때문에 read more, 이거 양지도 음지랑 똑같이 빡빡이가 처녀 다 따먹는 ㅈ같은거 아님. 개씨발 ㅈ같은작품 욕은 작품을 다 보고 해야하니까 보긴했는데 씨발. 번역 성취향이 특이한 여자친구 1화 들끓던 무렵에 양지작 작가 히소카 2024.

애니만화 동인지 들끓던 무렵에 같은 장편같은게 또없음, 여기서도 비슷한 시기의 다른 웹툰 만화가들에 비해 평가는 상당히 좋은 편이며 한창 안톤 오노의 비신사적인 행위로 전국이 들끓던 때, 차두리 강슛이란. 애니만화 동인지 들끓던 무렵에 같은 장편같은게 또없음.

차희원 가슴 스토리는 당연히 그대로 나오면 안되기 때문에 read more. 월면나치, 남극나치, 지하나치같은 창작물에 가까운 음모론부터, 비밀결사 형태로 존속 중이라는 음모론도 있음. 애니만화 동인지 들끓던 무렵에 같은 장편같은게 또없음. 개씨발 ㅈ같은작품 욕은 작품을 다 보고 해야하니까 보긴했는데 씨발. 망가 떡밥 돌때마다 추천하는 망가 있는 사람들이 네이버 메일 기반으로 한 파일공유 링크 만들어서 갤러들 모두 돌려먹을수 있게 퍼다주는 그런 문화였는데, 이런 문화가 사라지고 베리즈도 다 막히면서 너무, 너무 삭막해져버렸음. 주미 야동

지하철 꼭지 노출 3 12513231 마망을 따라하는 애옹쓰 ㅇㅇ112. 이런게 좋긴한데 같은게 ntr이라서 하필 ntr이냐 ㅅㅂ. Net › 283840848들끓던무렵에,치토세 같은거 또 없나 dogdrip. 들끓던 무렵에 양지판은 왜 사람마다 스토리가 다름 자연스럽게 2024. 애니만화 동인지 들끓던 무렵에 같은 장편같은게 또없음. 지수 딥페이크

주전자 99 나이트 인더 포레스트 ㄹㅇ 이 두개 능가하는 망가를 아직 못찾았다 그림페나 스토리나 너무 완벽. 그린 사람이 다른 작가인데 개인 취향상 원작 작가보다 못하다는 느낌임. 커플 2그룹이 같이 섹스하는 히토미물 추천점 러브코미디. 애니만화 동인지 들끓던 무렵에 같은 장편같은게 또없음. 월면나치, 남극나치, 지하나치같은 창작물에 가까운 음모론부터, 비밀결사 형태로 존속 중이라는 음모론도 있음. 중국 해설 리타

진동팬티 디시 이거 양지도 음지랑 똑같이 빡빡이가 처녀 다 따먹는 ㅈ같은거 아님. 한 10년쯤 전에만 해도 디시에는 빅파이라는 문화가 있었음. 들끓던무렵에 흑발 결국 퐁퐁했었나 202402202508 만화. 한 10년쯤 전에만 해도 디시에는 빅파이라는 문화가 있었음. 스토리는 당연히 그대로 나오면 안되기 때문에 read more.

주술회전 츠쿠모 유키 야스 그림풍은 들끓던무렵 짭느낌인데 느낌잘살림. 스팔타커스 엔젤 한국에서 반미 감정이 한창 들끓던 2003년에 나온 작품. 이 분야 최고봉은 들끓던 무렵에 의 작가인 katsura airi 가 최고라고 생각함 자매품으로는 이 작가의 최신작인 otto no buka ni ikasarechau aragaezu kanjite shimau furinzuma 남편의부하에게 속아넘어가」저항하지 못하고 느껴버리는 이것도 추천 5 폴산당 2024. 여기서도 비슷한 시기의 다른 웹툰 만화가들에 비해 평가는 상당히 좋은 편이며 한창 안톤 오노의 비신사적인 행위로 전국이 들끓던 때, 차두리 강슛이란. 의외로 실존하는 작전 오퍼레이션 페이퍼클립 에서 유래한 음모론임.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.