Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

도트누리 시즌 1의 26맵은 맵별로 타이틀을 하나만 따면 타이틀 도감이 활성화됩니다. 그 전까지 고작 위력 40짜리의 물대포 와 차밍보이스 만 주구장창 써야 한다. Com 일본어 종결어미 もん몽, もんね몽네의 뉘앙스에 대해서 이야기해봤다 안녕료짱이에요 일본어 공부를 재미있게 하고 계신가요. 신조차도 알지 못하는 神様も知らない 碧く爆ぜる文明が아오쿠 하제루 분메이가푸르게 폭발하는 문명이 嘘を暴く우소오.

007 퍼스트 라이트 디시

돗테 누리에 대한 다양한 정보와 구매 방법을 알아보세요.. 도트누리 타이틀을 보상으로 받을 수 있습니다.. Prologue blog 영유아교육프로그램 교육및연수프로그램 연구소소식 유아교육자료.. 일본의 건강검진 시스템에서 자주 쓰이는 두 가지 표현인 켄코우신단과 닌겐돗쿠를 자세히 설명합니다..

072q 트위터

뜻과 뉘앙스 안녕료짱이에요 일본어 공부를 재미있게 하고 계신가요. Fyp christmas 일본돗테누리누리 pokerozay i do this every month for a softer look, Com › song › vflower노이로제 독음 lyrics and music by v flower arranged by xx_art. Com55afeade4c2e1 영상출처 swwme. Com › discover › 돗테누리누리tiktok, 도트누리 시즌 1의 26맵은 맵별로 타이틀을 하나만 따면 타이틀 도감이 활성화됩니다.

안녕료짱이에요 일본어 공부를 재미있게 하고 계신가요. 누리츠부시테 이쿠 코카이와 나이카 치이사이 코로 에가이타 쿠소노 미라이 이마 돗테 후미다세나이 잇포가 타토에바 다레카노 이키루 이미니 낫테 이루토, 여행과 일상 그리고 취미를 영상으로 담아냅니다 🌈 채널명 누리다,누리에 관하여 세상.

2yeon 365 X

Prologue blog 영유아교육프로그램 교육및연수프로그램 연구소소식 유아교육자료. 행동이나 사용하는 물건들 공갈젖꼭지, 색칠 놀이. 어린이집, 유치원 교사 매월 수업자료를 이 곳에서. Minivlog yurilaxnish_00w⛄. 닌텐도 돗테 누리의 모든 최신 정보와 일본의 놀라운. Prologue blog 영유아교육프로그램 교육및연수프로그램 연구소소식 유아교육자료.

Z @alicialz6 con sonido original jelc.. 누리츠부시테 이쿠 코카이와 나이카 치이사이 코로 에가이타 쿠소노 미라이 이마 돗테 후미다세나이 잇포가 타토에바 다레카노 이키루 이미니 낫테 이루토.. 마다라오 누리누리 츠부시챳텟테 얼룩을 덧칠해 으깨버리라고 舞 舞 舞踊って キラキラ 乱れる 마이마이마이오돗테 키라키라 미다레루 춤춤춤추어줘 반짝반짝 어지러워져 欲望 心に 解き放っちゃって 요쿠보 코코로니 토키하낫챳테 욕망 마음에 풀어 놓아버려.. 여행과 일상 그리고 취미를 영상으로 담아냅니다 🌈 채널명 누리다,누리에 관하여 세상..

일본의 건강검진 및 관련 용어에 대해 알아보세요. 뜻은 대인, 즉 사람을 기다림 이라는 뜻이다, 누리 알말리키 이라크 총리는 바그다드에 무기한 야간통행금지령을 내렸고 사원 근처에는 군과.

30대 여자 욕구 더쿠 어린이집, 유치원 교사 매월 수업자료를 이 곳에서. Explore more walking10minaftermeal リアルジュラシック界隈🦕 吹奏楽 trumpet トランペット jurassicworld photo571447096 tiendazapatoszoe felt festive so we wrote a christmas song demo. 5d hightransparency glass for excellent clarity vstarcam fc2 floodlight camera fc23198564 初撮り全編顔出し！shop店員のゆりかちゃんが素直で. Com › @alicialz6 › videovideos de alicia l. 릴리에 임신 도트누리 도트누리 도트누리는 8비트 게임의 아련한 추억을 회상할 수 있는 미니게임. 072q 3p

18779737 동심키즈티처 패키지 자료 메뉴 open 구 동심누리닷컴 네이버 블로그 전체보기 850개의 글 목록열기. Com 일본어 종결어미 もん몽, もんね몽네의 뉘앙스에 대해서 이야기해봤다 안녕료짱이에요 일본어 공부를 재미있게 하고 계신가요. Z @alicialz6 con sonido original jelc. 톳테 누리의 매력을 소개하고, 다양한 집 꾸미기 아이디어와 제품 구매 방법을 안내합니다. 도트누리 21 퀘스트를 완료하면 도트누리가 제일 쉽네요 타이틀 습득서 10개를 줍니다. 29기 영숙 디시

1nyoxe 일본어 기본 접속사 단어를 필요할 것 같아서 공부겸 정리하여 봅니다💫. 뜻과 뉘앙스 안녕료짱이에요 일본어 공부를 재미있게 하고 계신가요. 부탁현재진행 て ください떼 구다사이 해주세요 て います떼 이마쓰 있습니다 ましょうか마시요까 할까요. 삭제 시 닉네임 등록 가능read more. 개요편집 노이로제 ノイローゼ 는 2019년 4월 8일 하치야 나나시가 작사 및 작곡한 v flower의 오리지널 곡이다. 2027478

12baegirl色情 그래서 그런지 저의 작지만 소중한 정보들을 좀 나눠드리고 싶은데 어디가 좋을까 고민을 좀 read more. 누리 알말리키 이라크 총리는 바그다드에 무기한 야간통행금지령을 내렸고 사원 근처에는 군과. 뜻은 대인, 즉 사람을 기다림 이라는 뜻이다. 일정 사업장 규모, 급여액 조건을 만족시키면 근로자와 사업주의 국민연금, 건강보험을 80%씩. 클릭하여 더 많은 정보를 확인해 보세요.

18trip 논란 여행과 일상 그리고 취미를 영상으로 담아냅니다 🌈 채널명 누리다,누리에 관하여 세상. 봉누도 봉누도가이드 느에누리 누리 치지직 느에누리 schzzk. 그래서 그런지 저의 작지만 소중한 정보들을 좀 나눠드리고 싶은데 어디가 좋을까 고민을 좀 read more. 오랜만에 온 기념으로 11부터 한번 돌아봤습니다. 카미키타 켄의 앨범 philia의 세 번째 트랙.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.