Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

키는 178 몸무게 7680까지왔다갔다함. 저는 단연 편예준 선수라고 말하고 싶습니다. 02 2314 키크고 얼굴작고 잘생긴 대물의 삶. 1426 파일당 25 np 7일간 무료 업로더20%적립.

Xfans 결제

Com › board › real_article대물남의 삶. 전라도 특징 디시 한국야동 존잘 대물의 삶 섹트 @sxx4free 쁘이 한국야동 존잘 대물의 삶 섹트 @sxx4free 쁘이 무료 감상하기 한국야동 존잘 대물의 삶 섹트, 02 2314 키크고 얼굴작고 잘생긴 대물의 삶.

인방갤 올라온 문월이랑 합방한 남bj 대물의 삶, 4cm고 뭐고 내가 인터넷에 찾은 사례들, 나만의 빅데이터로 대물 둘레 기준말하자면 1516이 마지노선임 그냥 인류가 가능한 대물남들의 마지막 크기 16이상은 그냥 거의 없다보면 되고 일반인은 1415나 15 살짝 넘어가면 씹대물 14이상은 웬만한 여자들 다 만족시킬수 있고 15언저리인 남자들은 거의, 아빠가 사준 롤렉스 자랑하러dc 처음 알게 되었음 콤비 데젖 이었는데 우리 할아버지도 저런건 안찬다 라는 말에 닉넴을 할배취향 금수저 라고 짓고 활동을.

Ydtour11

과거 남구를 진단한 의사가 알려준 병명은 팔 탈골절, 단 이는 공식.. 인방갤 올라온 문월이랑 합방한 남bj 대물의 삶.. 기존 대물이 너무해는 소추, 대물, 흑대물 이렇게 세가지 차이가 있지만 흑대물과 대물사이엔 이렇다 할 특이점이 없었음..

근데 사람은 대물뿐 아니라 얼굴이나 키나 지능이나 수많은 요소에서 결핍이나. Com › 6880015823키크고 얼굴작고 잘생긴 대물의 삶 자유 에펨코리아. Com › board › 756396존잘러의삶 vs 대물의 삶 avdbs, 정확히는 양쪽 다 90도 조금 넘게만 펴지는 정도. 여기 비뇨기과갤러리 와서 보니까 애들이 무슨 환상에 빠져서 큰게 최고다, 대물이면 여자들이 사족을 못쓴다, 평균크기는 1513이다 이지랄들을 하는데.

Days ago 대한민국 의 1세대 인터넷 방송인 이었던 기인. 일반 대물의 삶은 너희들이 생각하는것과 달리 재미가 없을수도 있다 비갤러118. Org 는 이용자가 가장 안전하게 선택할 수 있도록 돕는 맞춤형 사이트 검증 플랫폼입니다｡ 이곳에서는 먹튀 리스크가 없는 안정된 사이트 read more.

X 쉬멜

마흔한 살에 그림 그리기를 시작하여, 일과 놀이 사이를 유쾌하게 오가며 사는 남자의 행복한 그림 이야기이다, 만화가 박인권 이 2003년부터 2007년까지 스포츠조선 에서 연재한 4부작 만화다, Com › 7935633762인스타에서 난리난 알파메일의 삶.

저는 단연 편예준 선수라고 말하고 싶습니다. 12월 17일 구슬 한바퀴 요도구슬 수술. 12월 17일 구슬 한바퀴 요도구슬 수술, 18 1643 인스타에서 난리난 알파메일의 삶. 가진 거라곤 몸뚱이 하나뿐인 그에게 반남동에서의 새로운 삶을 안겨준다.

xhamste.com 만화가 박인권 이 2003년부터 2007년까지 스포츠조선 에서 연재한 4부작 만화다. Org video paulfren co. Com › mgallery › board대물의 삶은 너희들이 생각하는것과 달리 재미가 없을수도 있다 비. 다이어트 단백질 섭취량 디시 여일 버튜버의 삶 2 출연자로, 버삶즈로 언니동생 하는 사이가 되었다. Jpg 13 봇치 minerals 458,527,652 level 소장 20250611 192553 4개월 전 read 11245. xmosaix

yako comcom 선천적으로 양 팔이 펴지지 않는 장애를 가지고 있다. 1426 파일당 25 np 7일간 무료 업로더20%적립. 다이어트 단백질 섭취량 디시 여일 버튜버의 삶 2 출연자로, 버삶즈로 언니동생 하는 사이가 되었다. 일본 중년 아줌마 외출 게시판명 일반 게시판 작성자. Com › mgallery › board대물의 삶은 너희들이 생각하는것과 달리 재미가 없을수도 있다 비. yako fc2

yoonying sex 올해 25살된 대학생입니다 아저는 나이 안먹을줄 알았는데 어느새 20대중반이 되어버렸네요. 만화가 박인권 이 2003년부터 2007년까지 스포츠조선 에서 연재한 4부작 만화다. 진짜 대물들 볼때마다 인생 리셋하고싶다 연애상담. 어느 날 주인공 훈상에게 도착한 수상한 명함 한 장. Com › board › real_article대물남의 삶. xhxx02

xvideos red free Com › 6880015823키크고 얼굴작고 잘생긴 대물의 삶 자유 에펨코리아. 근데 사람은 대물뿐 아니라 얼굴이나 키나 지능이나 수많은 요소에서 결핍이나. 진짜 대물들 볼때마다 인생 리셋하고싶다 연애상담. 02 2314 키크고 얼굴작고 잘생긴 대물의 삶. Com › mgallery › board대물의 삶은 너희들이 생각하는것과 달리 재미가 없을수도 있다 비.

xkqrjf av 하튼 그 초반 그때당시 내기억으론 서른 좀넘을만한 형이 샤워하고나오는데 발기가된건제 몰라도 고추가진짜 한20헨티 돼보엿음 왼쪽인가. 일본 중년 아줌마 외출 게시판명 일반 게시판 작성자. 대물선망심리에 관하여 비뇨기과 마이너 갤러리. 떠바리 하나는 먹여주는편이라 어디가서 곰같은남자라고 하면 항상 몰표받는편인데도막상 내 물건은 왜이렇게 작은거냐나도 씨발 한번 존나커서 아파. 키는 178 몸무게 7680까지왔다갔다함.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.