Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Com › hashtag › 담양오리담양오리 youtube. 수배🔎 음주운전하다가 화물차박아서 폭발하는라이브영상. 광주지법 형사9단독은 9일 담양오리 채널 운영자 최모 42씨의 첫 공판을 진행했다. 음주운전 헌터의 추격전, 정의 구현인가, 과도한 개입인가.

후장 피스팅

히토미 깅간

검찰은 사적 제재를 명목으로 불특정 다수에게 위험을 가한 범죄에 엄정 대응하겠다고 밝혔다. Com › hashtag › 담양오리담양오리 youtube, 잠시 뒤 불꽃이 삽시간에 차량을 집어삼켰고. 한 유튜버가 음주운전 의심 차량을 뒤쫓는 과정을 생중계했는데, 달아나던 차량이 주차된 트레일러를 들이받았습니다. Drunk driving hunter causes death in damyang ori. 라이브방송에서 그거 실시간으로 나왔다는데 라이브영상 유튜버가 비공개처리한거같은데 원본 라이브영상 본사람이나 원본있는사람있음.

음주운전 신고 유튜버에게 쫒기다 30대 남성 사망, 생방송 켜고 뒤쫓다 쾅사적 제재 논란 sbs. Com › view › 20240924n13535d리포트 음주운전했지, 찾아보니까 전직건달이였던애가 음주운전잡는거로 추격하다가 저지랄난거구만ㅋㅋㅋ dc app.

후카와 토코 성우

음주운전 헌터의 추격전, 정의 구현인가, 과도한 개입인가. Listpl3eb1n33oaxijb youtu, 음주운전 헌터의 추격전, 정의 구현인가, 과도한 개입인가, 오산 음주사고 사건, 음주운전 체포현장, 시화방조제 사고, 오산 자동차 사고 담양오리 교통사고 흑염룡 교통사고 문월 방공사고 교통사고 합의금 근로상실금. 이번 사건은 지난 22일 새벽 광주 광산구에서 발생했으며, 당시 담양오리는 자신의 유튜브 채널을 통해 음주운전자를 실시간으로 추적하는 장면을 생방송으로 송출하고 있었다, Listpl3eb1n33oaxijb youtu.

음주운전자 추격 유튜버, 사적제재 찬반 논란 실시간 베스트.. 생방송 켜고 뒤쫓다 쾅사적 제재 논란 sbs.. 03% 이상 취했다는 전제며 단순히 술마시고 운전했다로 판단.. 유튜버 ‘담양오리’로 활동 중인 최영수 씨가 음주운전 의심자를 추적하는 과정에서 한 운전자가 사망하는 사건이 발생해 논란이 일고 있다..

음주운전 의심 차량을 추격하며 생중계를 이어가던 유튜버 담양오리가 사망사고와 관련해 재판에 넘겨졌다. 신고할게요하니까 그음주운전한 사람이 존나 엑셀밟고 튀다가 화물차박고 폭발했다는데. 음주운전 추격 담양오리 유튜버 사적제재 법적 처벌은, 사고 전 음주 운전자 추격 영상을 찍는 유튜버를 피해 달아나다가 벌어진 일이었습니다. 사건은 지난 22일 새벽 광주 광산구에서 일어났다, A midnight chase fugitive dies during live.

사건 당시 고향인 진도로 가려고 아내와 딸을 데리고 시내를 벗어나려 했다. A midnight chase fugitive dies during live, 검찰은 사적 제재를 명목으로 불특정 다수에게 위험을 가한 범죄에 엄정 대응하겠다고 밝혔다, 그런건 뺑소니 후 도주같은 경우에 해당되는거지 애당초 음주운전 정의는 혈중알콜농도 0. 음주운전 헌터 담양오리, 음주운전자 추격 도중 운전자가 사망했다면, 담양오리에게도 책임이 있을까요, Kr › news › endpaged리포트 음주운전했지.

환승연애 시즌4 미니 갤러리

Com › discover › 담양오리교통사고tiktok, 그런건 뺑소니 후 도주같은 경우에 해당되는거지 애당초 음주운전 정의는 혈중알콜농도 0, 음주운전 신고 유튜버에게 쫒기다 30대 남성 사망. Com › view › 20240924n13535d리포트 음주운전했지.

히라라 다시보기

사건 당시 고향인 진도로 가려고 아내와 딸을 데리고 시내를 벗어나려 했다. 담양오리가 음주운전자로 추정되는 30대 남성에게 음주운전 여부를 물은 뒤 경찰에 신고하겠다고 하자 해당 남성이 달아났고, 검은색 승용차가 중앙선을 넘어 빠른 속도로 내달리더니 주차된 트레일러를 들이받고 멈춰 섭니다. 찾아보니까 전직건달이였던애가 음주운전잡는거로 추격하다가 저지랄난거구만ㅋㅋㅋ dc app. 김성수 씨는 화물차를 운전하는 사람이었다.

히든페이스 다시보기 누누티비 그음주운전한 사람이 존나 엑셀밟고 튀다가. Com › hashtag › 담양오리담양오리 youtube. 란 질문에 음주운전자는 도망가다가 주차된트레일러를들이박고 차량 폭발 사망함 이에 담양오리는 사과방송 진행유튜버 피하다 숨진 30대 음주운전자 유족 반발. Com › view › 20240924n13535d리포트 음주운전했지. 사건발생 당시 담양오리는 a 씨에게 접근해 음주 운전 여부를 물은 뒤 경찰에 신고하겠다고 말한 것으로 전해졌습니다. 흑갸루 야짤

히요밍 av Com › 7508844040음주운전자 유튜버에 걸려 도망가다 사망. 검찰은 사적 제재를 명목으로 불특정 다수에게 위험을 가한 범죄에 엄정 대응하겠다고 밝혔다. 라이브방송에서 그거 실시간으로 나왔다는데 라이브영상 유튜버가 비공개처리한거같은데 원본 라이브영상 본사람이나 원본있는사람있음. 나 여기 근처사는데 어제 유튜버 담양오리라는사람이 운주운전한 사람보고 음주운전하셨죠. 2024년 들어서는 음주운전 차량 검거, 폭주족 단속 방송을 하는 중이다. 환승연애 시즌4 미니 갤러리 - 커뮤니티 포털 디시인사이드

히토미 crossdr Com › mgallery › board음주운전하다가 화물차박아서 폭발하는라이브영상 로스트 미디어 마. 음주운전 헌터라고 불리던 유튜버 담양오리 음주운전자를 추격하는 생방송 도중 운전자가 사망하는 사건이 발생했는데요. 음주 추정 운전자 추격 사망 사건편집. A midnight chase fugitive dies during live. 검은색 승용차가 중앙선을 넘어 빠른 속도로 내달리더니 주차된 트레일러를 들이받고 멈춰 섭니다. 황근출 레제

히토미 배빵 태그 Com › hashtag › 담양오리담양오리 youtube. 검은색 승용차가 중앙선을 넘어 빠른 속도로 내달리더니 주차된 트레일러를 들이받고 멈춰 섭니다. 생방송 켜고 뒤쫓다 쾅사적제재 논란 sbs. Com › mgallery › board음주운전하다가 화물차박아서 폭발하는라이브영상 로스트 미디어 마. 음주운전 헌터 담양오리, 음주운전자 추격 도중 운전자가 사망했다면, 담양오리에게도 책임이 있을까요.

히토미 금태양 음주운전 헌터의 추격전, 정의 구현인가, 과도한 개입인가. Com › mgallery › board음주운전하다가 화물차박아서 폭발하는라이브영상 로스트 미디어 마. Com › 7508844040음주운전자 유튜버에 걸려 도망가다 사망. 03% 이상 취했다는 전제며 단순히 술마시고 운전했다로 판단. 그러나 계엄군이 막았고, 다시 북쪽에 있는 담양.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.