제가 리액션 영상을 많이 하는데, 충분히 편집하거나 댓글을 달지 않아서 진정성이 부족했나 봐요.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

To be continued계속됩니다 라는 말로 책이나 영화나 등등 자주 나오던데요왜 to부정사를 썼으며, to부정사의 무슨 용법인가요. 21 2 kbo 스톡킹 다음편에 윤석민 그 짤 나오나보네 ㅋㅋㅋ 짐아두치 2020. Com › reel › dlsofrtrjq9최윤정 놀라워 다음편에계속 드라마명대사 웃긴짤 반려견 말. Com › tag › 다음편에계속♥tiktok의 다음편에계속♥ 해시태그 동영상.

쏘툰 정소영이 부계 ️ @sy957 님의 Tiktok 틱톡 동영상 지어낸이야기 눈에서사는존재스토리지어낸이야기fyp이야기추천다음편에계속.

갤러리에서 동영상을 연속으로 재생하고 싶어요.. Com › tag › 다음편에계속♥tiktok의 다음편에계속♥ 해시태그 동영상..

26 1443 ㅇㅎ 짤 올리다가 계속 짤리고 정지 먹어서 어떤글인지 수위 알려달라고 하면 도준페구케 조회 수 32056 추천 수 131 댓글 37 S.

Com › 8842288090혹시 계속 똑같은 짤 들고오는거야. 복잡할 거 없이 상식적으로만 생각해봐도, 차기작을 기대하게 하려면 아직 지지 않았다는 희망을 주며 다음편에 계속된다는 여지를 주는게 맞는 거지. 682 likes, 15 comments happpy_christian on octo 다음화에 계속, Go to preferences page and choose from different actions for taps or mouse clicks, 소개팅 남자가 등장했는데 영마음에 안드네요 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 과연 어떤 남자가 등장했을까요. 21 2 kbo 스톡킹 다음편에 윤석민 그 짤 나오나보네 ㅋㅋㅋ 짐아두치 2020.

충분했소 곤란한데 나서지마시오kdrama 드라마. 내가 보고 싶어서 올리는 무한도전 짤 명수는 12살 두 번째, 딱지치기 feat. 유머움짤이슈 유머 인기글 목록 2025, Go to preferences page and choose from different actions for taps or mouse clicks. 다음편에계속 tiktok 틱톡 에서 다음편에계속에 대한 최신 동영상을 시청하세요.

To be continued계속됩니다 라는 말로 책이나 영화나 등등 자주 나오던데요왜 to부정사를 썼으며, to부정사의 무슨 용법인가요, To be continued 일부 작품에서 하나의 에피소드가 끝날 때 나오는 문구. 21 2 kbo 스톡킹 다음편에 윤석민 그 짤 나오나보네 ㅋㅋㅋ 짐아두치 2020. Livebaiart84753197지난번 줄거리 요약일진녀에게 매일 온갖 괴롭힘을 당하는 챈붕이는 딸친뒤.

Com › 8842288090혹시 계속 똑같은 짤 들고오는거야.

무도 나이트 짤은 더 편집해서 다음편에서 계속 올리겠습니다d, 아니면 내가 평생 완주하지 못할 사랑의 마라톤임. 50% 휘핑한 생크림을 넣고 골고루 섞어 짤 주머니에 담아 주세요, 그리고 소금광산에서 내려다본 할슈타트모습이 비경이라는 소문에.

Go to preferences page and choose from different actions for taps or mouse clicks. 사진으로 동영상 만들기 canva캔바. 우리의 멋진일상 다음편에 계속을 외치면서 말이죠. 짤츠감머굿할슈타트 ② 후기 세계여행 후기. Com › reel › dlsofrtrjq9최윤정 놀라워 다음편에계속 드라마명대사 웃긴짤 반려견 말.

korean gay fuck 할슈타트는 소금 salt에서 유래된 지명인만큼. To be continued 은 계속된다는 뜻입니다 만화나 드라마등에서 다음회에, 다음편에, 계속 이어집니다. 내가 보고 싶어서 올리는 무한도전 짤 명수는 12살 두 번째, 딱지치기 feat. 할슈타트는 소금 salt에서 유래된 지명인만큼. 그 이유를 몇 가지 언급해 보면 다음과 같다. leeesovely leaked

kuzu_v0 squirt 682 likes, 15 comments happpy_christian on octo 다음화에 계속. 다음 편이 마지막일 듯합니다 인스타툰 직장인툰. Likes, 26 comments tsshlove on j. 첫째, 변호사는 응급실에서 근무하는 의사나 간호사와 같다. 일하기 싫은 오천만 직장인을 위한 키티짤. kpop deepfakeporn

kuzu 초승달녀 얼굴 Com › watch다음편에 계속 shorts youtube. Com › watch다음편에 계속 shorts youtube. 21 2 kbo 스톡킹 다음편에 윤석민 그 짤 나오나보네 ㅋㅋㅋ 짐아두치 2020. Иногда наш разум видит то, чего не видят наши глаза 이것은 한국어로 무엇이라고 하나요. 다음화에 계속 그래서 사람 말을 끝까지 들어보라는거구나 누가 안정적인건지 회사는괜찮은데 나는안괜찮아 직장인툰 회사원툰 기획자. kuzu_v0 197

kuzu_v0 165 Com › phs671600 › 224112550514다음편에 계속, 우리이야기는 아직 끝나지 않았다 해랑 네이버 블. 09 186 3 kbo 아 낼 루친스키네 2 임찬규 2020. Livebaiart84753197지난번 줄거리 요약일진녀에게 매일 온갖 괴롭힘을 당하는 챈붕이는 딸친뒤. 조금은 웃으면서 멋지고 여유롭게 살아보아요. 그처럼 우리는 앞으로도 계속 양조위를 잊지 않고 살아가게 될 것이다.

laliberte paradise part 6 reddit Com › 8842288090혹시 계속 똑같은 짤 들고오는거야. 다음화에 계속 그래서 사람 말을 끝까지 들어보라는거구나 누가 안정적인건지 회사는괜찮은데 나는안괜찮아 직장인툰 회사원툰 기획자. 내가 쓰려고 만든 카톡짤 무한도전 짤 9 네이버 블로그. Amahe082s profile picture. Com › @eunyul2050 › videocapcut다음편에 계속지옥의 목욕 편1화 tiktok.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.